Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama ran after only 2 years in the Senate. Why is this a tougher prospect for Warren? Here's why: [View all]treestar
(82,383 posts)35. Exactly!
That state houses and governorships, too. That's where the gerrymandering and splitting Electoral College votes comes in. Along with the insane laws like not giving Fs for creation science. That threat that Pennsylvania's electoral votes could be split - they can get that through with enough Republicans on the local level.
And agreed absolutely about the Dems having good candidates for the Presidency. The Republican clown car every four years just proves how hopeless the R party is. Even when their candidate "wins" it's a moron like Dubya or his Daddy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama ran after only 2 years in the Senate. Why is this a tougher prospect for Warren? Here's why: [View all]
cali
Feb 2013
OP
It's not very tough to run. It's tough to win. I hope she, at the very least, makes a run.
w4rma
Feb 2013
#1
See that, one learns something new in a second, never knew she was a Republican.
graham4anything
Feb 2013
#3
I think supporting Hagel in spite of his war vote makes snarking at Hillary for the same thing
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2013
#12
True. Lost in all the left-leaning celebration about the end of the Republican Party is ...
Ian_rd
Feb 2013
#19
2014 gubernatorial/statehouses/senate/house are the MOST important elections in a LONG time
SoCalDem
Feb 2013
#40
After 8yrs of Bush's policies destroying the country's economy ANY Dem nominee was winning 2008
blm
Feb 2013
#34
Call me selfish, but I'd like to keep her as my senator for as long as possible.
graywarrior
Feb 2013
#42
I don't want to be a stick in the mud, but can't we see how this thing is going to play out, just
CTyankee
Feb 2013
#43
Hopefully, her "inexperience" has kept her from learning to triangulate.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2013
#57
Thanks for the info. My already nebulous support for her dropped a couple notches.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2013
#60
people were already talking about obama being president someday before he was even a senator
unblock
Feb 2013
#51
Obama's lack of history in the Senate was a plus. No embarrassing votes.
lumberjack_jeff
Feb 2013
#58