Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Did Occupy Oakland Believe Their Move-In Day Would Succeed? [View all]MineralMan
(151,269 posts)12. I did some research. The Convention Center was closed
in 2006. It's been vacant since. Apparently, the cost of renovating it and bringing heating and other systems up to code would cost around $6 Million. Last spring, there was a plan for the city to buy the building with redevelopment funds, but I'm not certain whether that actually happened or not. In any event, the building would not be allowed to be used for anything in its present state. I don't know if it's actually unsafe, or just not suitable for use as a convention center.
It's been replaced by a modern convention center in Oakland, so it really wasn't needed for that purpose. I don't know what the city's plans were for it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The thugs are the ones who started with the violence from the begining of ows. The protesters
SammyWinstonJack
Jan 2012
#30
As long as they are continually getting publicity and comments/reactions from official,
morningfog
Jan 2012
#46
Ya know, that aint a half bad idea. All the Occupy protestors wear a shirt plainly labeled, LIBERAL
WingDinger
Jan 2012
#17
I'd say they failed to take over the building because our society HAS broken down
Capitalocracy
Jan 2012
#18
Yes, they could've used M-16s, but that doesn't make what they've been doing acceptable.
Capitalocracy
Jan 2012
#36
And they did not get the Pentagon off the ground. It was not the point to do so.
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2012
#39
I suppose there's no sense trying to do anything unless there's a 100% chance of unqualified success
gratuitous
Jan 2012
#22
The odds were much in favor of the attempted takeover as ending the way it did.
randome
Jan 2012
#24
No, I'm not saying that at all. If that were true, few of the large protests I
MineralMan
Jan 2012
#25
Isn't this EXACTLY what the right does that drives us crazy? Or is it OK to be an apologist as long
renie408
Jan 2012
#51
It passed their General Assembly, so a majority of them must have thought it would work.
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#65