Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)

6. Yes he was, where the officer is wrong

Reply to TheBlackAdder (Reply #1)

Mon Feb 25, 2013, 02:35 PM

Feb 2013

You could have a full auto AK with a class III license. He lacked it. There are federal charges for this as well.

And this was a dumb criminal. The ones who get caught are usually dumb.

(For the record I suspect there are far more fully auto toys than we are willing to admit)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Assailant shoots into SF home with AK-47 [View all] AsahinaKimi Feb 2013 OP

Up until the guy sprayed the house... he wasn't a convicted criminal, was he? n/t TheBlackAdder Feb 2013 #1

Actually, he was already a criminal by being in unlawful possession of the rifle slackmaster Feb 2013 #2

But not a registered criminal. TheBlackAdder Feb 2013 #4

He's still not a registered criminal. slackmaster Feb 2013 #8

Depends Mopar151 Feb 2013 #5

Yes he was, where the officer is wrong nadinbrzezinski Feb 2013 #6

He should have been. onehandle Feb 2013 #7

Officer Esparza is a wise man slackmaster Feb 2013 #3