Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Before our white brothers arrived to make us civilized men…" [View all]mikekohr
(2,312 posts)108. PILGRIMS, PURITANS, CHRISTIANS, COLONISTS:
In 1636, eager to appropriate land belonging to the Pequot people, an alliance was formed with the Narragansett People. Surrounding a Peqout village on the site of present day Mystic, Connecticut, this force promptly set fire to the village and put to the sword all those that attempted escape. In an hours time seven were taken captive, seven escaped and between 600 to 700 lay dead. 31). 77).
William Bradford described the slaughter in these words, "It was a fearful sight to see them thus frying in the fire, and the streams of blood quenching the same, and horrible was the stink and stench thereof; but the victory seemed a sweet sacrifice and they gave praise thereof to God." 1)
The Narragansetts were mortified at the slaughter and pleaded in vain to Captain John Underhill, "It is naught, it is naught, because it is too furious and slays too many men." 1) The humanitarian concerns of the Narragansetts were rebuked. And in their witnessing the slaughter of the Pequot, the Narragansetts saw a portent and vision of what would befall their people in a few short years at the hands of the rapidly expanding colonies.
Underhill would later justify the killing of women and children by quoting the Holy Bible, "Sometimes the Scripture declareth women and children must perish with their parents." 31)
It was not enough to merely slaughter the Pequot people . Hoping to wipe their memory from history, laws were passed making it a crime to even utter the word Pequot. These efforts to shape history have only been partially successful. There are those that remember and are aware.
On December 19th 1675, six days before the celebration of Christmas, an armed force was lead into battle against the once friendly Wampanoag people, at the place that was to become known as, "The Great Swamp Massacre."
The Wampanoags, .were no longer willing to yield land to the rapidly growing colonies. This transgression would be dealt with forcefully. In the early morning hours this army attacked a sleeping village of mostly women, children, and old people. Setting fire to the village homes, and burning the Wampanoag people to death. Over 2000 Wampanoag People were slaughtered at this place.
One Christian soldier, sickened by the stench of burning flesh and horrified by the screams of the dying,, asked of his commander, "Is burning alive, men, women, and children, consistent with the benevolent principles of the Gospel?" 12).
Increase Mather rejoiced in his writing, that when survivors of this massacre "....came to see the ashes of their friends, mingled with the ashes of their fort.... where the English had been doing a good day's work, they Howl'd, they Roar'd, they Stamp'd, they tore their hair,.... and were the pictures of so many Devils in Desperation." 31)
The leader of the Wampanoag, Metacomet, a man the colonists called King Phillip, was killed shortly afterward. The body of Metacomet was drawn and quartered. Metacomet's severed head, was impaled on a iron spike which was driven into the ramparts of a bridge. This ghastly trophy remained upon the bridge for the next twenty years, a warning to those that might oppose the will and wishes of the Colonists. 12)
Those Wampanoag, unfortunate to be captured alive, were placed on a slave ship bound for the Bahama's and sold into slavery, yielding a handsome profit for the colonies. Metacomet's wife and children were among those sent into slavery. They were never to see their homeland again.
Many rationalize the wars between the colonists and their Native neighbors as conflicts that resulted from two cultures that did not understand one another. This thinking is often stated along with the idea that if the Native People would have just adapted to the "superior" culture of the European people then all conflict would have been mitigated. Examination of the "Blue Laws," refutes this thinking.
The "Blue Laws" were designed not to "elevate" the Native People to the European concept of civilization but rather to reduce Native People to a level less than human. Among the various "Blue Laws" were statutes whose intent was to reduce social association of White and Native People.
Many within colonial communities, found the Native way of life more desirable than that of their own. These "converts" lived with and adopted the dress and life-ways of their Native neighbors. To eliminate this threat from within, the "Blue Laws" forbade the wearing of Native dress, they forbade the practice of Native spiritual belief by both White AND Native Peoples, it was forbidden to wear ones hair long in the fashion of the Native People. Those that were convicted of violating these laws could expect the death penalty. 31) 1)
But perhaps most telling of all, in part as a result of the legacy of the "Blue Laws", the Massachusetts legislature in 1789 passed a law that forbade the teaching of reading and writing to the Native People. Violators of this law were also subject to the penalty of death. 1)
Today America recoils in horror as it examines the religious extremism and intolerance of the Taliban legacy in Afghanistan. But we forget that we once had a Taliban in America, they were called Pilgrims, Puritans, and Colonists, and we honor and feast their memory each year at the holiday of Thanksgiving.
It is an ironic facet of the American Myth that the Pilgrims and Puritans are popularly held forth as an example of a people setting out in search of religious tolerance and cultural freedom. In truth these Europeans set out for a place were they would ultimately enforce their own version of religious, cultural and political correctness upon others.
While there was a degree of cultural misunderstanding between the colonists and their Native benefactors, the understanding that did exist was far more complete than many would have us believe. But one conclusion is inescapable. The colonists understood that Native People stood in the way of their appropriation of land needed for expansion of the growing colonies. The Pilgrims, the Puritans, and their compatriots, like the other European people that followed them to America, would use any excuse, any method conceivable to take the land they desired.
http://www.brotherhooddays.com/HEROES.html#The Pilgrims
reprinted here with permission of author, Mike Kohr
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There most certainly WAS property as we know it. It was owned, allocated and protected by the tribe.
KittyWampus
Feb 2013
#27
They also had the wisdom to give representation to the 7th generation regarding all decisions
Dragonfli
Feb 2013
#24
Part true, for some groups of NA, lots of bullshit too. NA had slavery
Exultant Democracy
Feb 2013
#4
" there was not a thief, nor a vicious man, nor an adulteress, nor was a bad woman ..."
Coyotl
Feb 2013
#7
We Indians are Latin America's moral reserve. We act according to a universal law that consists of
mikekohr
Feb 2013
#116
not much advantage in being a thief when you depend on your tribe for everything, so you're
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#68
what is your problem? i'm obviously talking about within one's own tribe. and. fyi. there are
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#105
Counting coup was limited to a few Plains nations, and developed long after contact with whites
Recursion
Feb 2013
#34
Columbus noted in his journals that young girls of the ages 9 to 10 were the most desired by his men
mikekohr
Feb 2013
#111
LOL! Killed off the dinosaurs too, I reckon. Maybe even caused the ice age with all those campfirea!
Zorra
Feb 2013
#62
It is easier to justify the disposession and near extirmination of a People when you marginalize
mikekohr
Feb 2013
#103
Or perhaps massive climate change was the culprit, but let's blame the Indians anyway
mikekohr
Feb 2013
#86
The megafauna of the North American continent included mammoths, giant ground sloths, mastodons...
Ikonoklast
Feb 2013
#97
Well, that certainly makes the demise of the NA Indian all worthwhile, doesn't it? nt.
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#14
Just pointing out that horse were an invasive species, just like many others that came with them
hobbit709
Feb 2013
#16
"The earth is an organism, and that organism has a skin; that skin has diseases...
alterfurz
Feb 2013
#89
To put it that way, no. But there is a great deal of respect for their close relationship with
gtar100
Feb 2013
#63
There were horses in NA until around the time that the natives crossed over from Siberia.
cemaphonic
Feb 2013
#74
Would One Want To Elaborate On The Profundity Of "Over-romanticized twaddle"?
cantbeserious
Feb 2013
#22
Weren't there 500 nations? Did all of them have the same laws and way of life? Did all of them get
lunamagica
Feb 2013
#25
IIRC, most if not all Native American tribes were essentially matriarchal.
kestrel91316
Feb 2013
#30
no such generalization can be made. there's a wide variation in time and space.
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#71
Before individual property rights, property belonged to tribes. You'd no choice but adhere to tribal
KittyWampus
Feb 2013
#26
"Don't romantize tribal life." - Seems to work pretty well for the wealthy. n/t
jtuck004
Feb 2013
#28
The First Nations practiced genocidal warfare, slavery, and hunted species to extinction
Recursion
Feb 2013
#31
Shh, the noble savage, in perfect harmony with nature and each other shall not be questioned.
X_Digger
Feb 2013
#47
I think it's ironic that you say so, considering that Lame Deer spent most of his life living
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#70
Where, pray, would I find indian history but in books - written by "red", "white", "historian" and
Democracyinkind
Feb 2013
#76
Desmond Tutu: "When the white man came, they had the Bible, and we had the land. And they said,
struggle4progress
Feb 2013
#65
absence of locks, private property, prisons, etc isn't specific to native americans; it's the usual
HiPointDem
Feb 2013
#66
The quote is romantic - a longing for a heritage that was torn, instead of let to evolve.
toby jo
Feb 2013
#92
This was posted By Randy Isbister, my Native friend from Saskatchewan, on my Facebook Page
mikekohr
Feb 2013
#112
This is the kind of sentimental tripe that appeals to people who didn't pay attention in their
msanthrope
Feb 2013
#119
You should read "Lame Deer, Seeker of Visions." from which the lead post was taken
mikekohr
Feb 2013
#122