Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gun Control? We Need Domestic Disarmament (Huffington Post) [View all]X_Digger
(18,585 posts)85. 7 post newbie (joined 4 hours ago) with 'liberal' in the username..
all 7 posts seem to be extreme.. I'm thinking.. not serious.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2432543
A long term fix to our economy...
Would actually be to encourage women to have more children and for families to have six or seven children as opposed to just one or two. In an ideal world, the government would have free daycare and other support programs to help alleviate the cost of raising children so it would be more feasible to have large families again.
Would actually be to encourage women to have more children and for families to have six or seven children as opposed to just one or two. In an ideal world, the government would have free daycare and other support programs to help alleviate the cost of raising children so it would be more feasible to have large families again.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2433106
The only good man with a gun...
Is wearing a government uniform. There might be a few bad police officers or military personnel, and there might be a few good armed civilians; but the OP shows why I viewed armed citizens as nothing less than dire threats to an established government.
Aside from the fact that lawful violence is the domain of the state; this illustrates why civilian disarmament is the only logical end to the gun control debate.
Is wearing a government uniform. There might be a few bad police officers or military personnel, and there might be a few good armed civilians; but the OP shows why I viewed armed citizens as nothing less than dire threats to an established government.
Aside from the fact that lawful violence is the domain of the state; this illustrates why civilian disarmament is the only logical end to the gun control debate.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2432717
That was my point actually.
We need to encourage reproduction through some sort of government action; either by making it easier financially to have and raise children, or perhaps even paying women for it.
We need to encourage reproduction through some sort of government action; either by making it easier financially to have and raise children, or perhaps even paying women for it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perhaps the reason that there is no call for all out disarmament is very simple,
MadHound
Feb 2013
#4
The RKBA was effectively an individual right pretty much through our nation's history anyway.
krispos42
Feb 2013
#9
If the Second Amendment wasn't about an armed citizenry, why the hell did they write it?
NYC_SKP
Feb 2013
#11
Unless the Second Amendment were actually overturned, I don't see how this could happen.
OceanEcosystem
Feb 2013
#27
Clearly you keep that one handy in your sporran for just such occasions.
IveWornAHundredPants
Feb 2013
#83
Rome wasn't built in a day, and neither is a gun-free society. It will take a few generations.
mwrguy
Feb 2013
#36
Within that time, there will likely be a societal breakdown, a revolution, natural disaster...
NYC_SKP
Feb 2013
#38
Disarm all police and sheriffs, the FBI, DHS, TSA, NSA, and all involved on US soil
Fire Walk With Me
Feb 2013
#39
You are implying that gun control laws will result in only criminals and cops having guns.
Fire Walk With Me
Feb 2013
#41
That's what we are discussing here, changing the friggin laws that allow yahoos and right wing
Hoyt
Feb 2013
#64
Tee hee, but they sure are funny! I just love the pic of the guy with his gun slung right
CTyankee
Feb 2013
#68
maybe they think women wll think they're "well hung"...when they're probably laughing at them...
CTyankee
Feb 2013
#71
Take this test to find out! I ended up somewhat to the left of Gandhi, LOL
Rhiannon12866
Feb 2013
#89