Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tom Tomorrow Wins Herblock Prize! [View all]G_j
(40,569 posts)64. It's been shown that wolves are GOOD for the ecosystem.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/29/opinion/the-world-needs-wolves.html
<snip>
Many Americans, even as they view the extermination of a species as morally anathema, struggle to grasp the tangible effects of the loss of wolves. It turns out that, far from being freeloaders on the top of the food chain, wolves have a powerful effect on the well-being of the ecosystems around them from the survival of trees and riverbank vegetation to, perhaps surprisingly, the health of the populations of their prey.
An example of this can be found in Wyomings Yellowstone National Park, where wolves were virtually wiped out in the 1920s and reintroduced in the 90s. Since the wolves have come back, scientists have noted an unexpected improvement in many of the parks degraded stream areas.
Stands of aspen and other native vegetation, once decimated by overgrazing, are now growing up along the banks. This may have something to do with changing fire patterns, but it is also probably because elk and other browsing animals behave differently when wolves are around. Instead of eating greenery down to the soil, they take a bite or two, look up to check for threats, and keep moving. The greenery can grow tall enough to reproduce.
Beavers, despite being on the wolfs menu, also benefit when their predators are around. The healthy vegetation encouraged by the presence of wolves provides food and shelter to beavers. Beavers in turn go on to create dams that help keep rivers clean and lessen the effects of drought. Beaver activity also spreads a welcome mat for thronging biodiversity. Bugs, amphibians, fish, birds and small mammals find the water around dams to be an ideal habitat.
So the beavers keep the rivers from drying up while, at the same time, healthy vegetation keeps the rivers from flooding, and all this biological interaction helps maintain rich soil that better sequesters carbon that stuff we want to get out of the atmosphere and back into the ground. In other words, by helping to maintain a healthy ecosystem, wolves are connected to climate change: without them, these landscapes would be more vulnerable to the effects of those big weather events we will increasingly experience as the planet warms.
Scientists call this sequence of impacts down the food chain a trophic cascade. The wolf is connected to the elk is connected to the aspen is connected to the beaver. Keeping these connections going ensures healthy, functioning ecosystems, which in turn support human life.
<snip>
<snip>
Many Americans, even as they view the extermination of a species as morally anathema, struggle to grasp the tangible effects of the loss of wolves. It turns out that, far from being freeloaders on the top of the food chain, wolves have a powerful effect on the well-being of the ecosystems around them from the survival of trees and riverbank vegetation to, perhaps surprisingly, the health of the populations of their prey.
An example of this can be found in Wyomings Yellowstone National Park, where wolves were virtually wiped out in the 1920s and reintroduced in the 90s. Since the wolves have come back, scientists have noted an unexpected improvement in many of the parks degraded stream areas.
Stands of aspen and other native vegetation, once decimated by overgrazing, are now growing up along the banks. This may have something to do with changing fire patterns, but it is also probably because elk and other browsing animals behave differently when wolves are around. Instead of eating greenery down to the soil, they take a bite or two, look up to check for threats, and keep moving. The greenery can grow tall enough to reproduce.
Beavers, despite being on the wolfs menu, also benefit when their predators are around. The healthy vegetation encouraged by the presence of wolves provides food and shelter to beavers. Beavers in turn go on to create dams that help keep rivers clean and lessen the effects of drought. Beaver activity also spreads a welcome mat for thronging biodiversity. Bugs, amphibians, fish, birds and small mammals find the water around dams to be an ideal habitat.
So the beavers keep the rivers from drying up while, at the same time, healthy vegetation keeps the rivers from flooding, and all this biological interaction helps maintain rich soil that better sequesters carbon that stuff we want to get out of the atmosphere and back into the ground. In other words, by helping to maintain a healthy ecosystem, wolves are connected to climate change: without them, these landscapes would be more vulnerable to the effects of those big weather events we will increasingly experience as the planet warms.
Scientists call this sequence of impacts down the food chain a trophic cascade. The wolf is connected to the elk is connected to the aspen is connected to the beaver. Keeping these connections going ensures healthy, functioning ecosystems, which in turn support human life.
<snip>
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I have good reason for my concern about the BFEE. Why you feel it's a waste of time is your concern.
Octafish
Feb 2013
#27
If we can’t prosecute banksters, war criminals & traitors, they don’t need to go after me.
Octafish
Feb 2013
#33
zappaman's Post #10 shouldn't have been hidden; it's spot-on. The DU jury wasn't aware of the
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#67
It's not an "opinion" it's a FACT: you *precisely* implied LHO was heroic here:
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#69
(1) Baloney. (2) You wrote every speck of it, as proven. (3) More baloney. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#82
Thanks for *once again* allowing me to expose your credibility with that "bibliography" nonsense,
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#71
It is indeed a "great read," as it deals with so much silliness in one fell swoop.
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#74
JFK wanted to wage the Cold War - and he sent the first 20,000 combat troops to Vietnam.
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#78
Certainly the facts are JFK sent the first 20,000 combat troops to Vietnam, period.
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#81
Seeing how you can't supply a link or a source, you are just wasting time and disrupting.
Octafish
Feb 2013
#86
Seeing how my "source" is common American history - accepted by every credible scholar from
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#87
Too many to name - and none you've ever read. Your link to your own post to a CT'er baloney blog
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#85
Absolutely. Tom Tomorrow pegs this age, as Herblock chronicled his times through his work...
Octafish
Feb 2013
#6
Longtime living national treasure...from when his stuff was in Black & White...
Octafish
Feb 2013
#15
Is. And he's taken a bit of grief over the decades for telling the truth about the turds...
Octafish
Feb 2013
#22
Great news!! I've followed his work for close to 30 years, starting with the "Processed World" days.
klook
Feb 2013
#21