General Discussion

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)

13. If it goes back to the congress to decide

Wed Feb 27, 2013, 06:11 PM

Feb 2013

Who decides?
House?
Senate?
Both?

and what happens in the in between period (I think nothing, it remains on the books til redecided.)

I would suggest that if reexamined
All states that fly the dixie flag in great numbers should have restrictions
Same with states that think Davis and Lee are honorable and not the traitors that they were

So in essence, maybe MORE states need to be added if re-looked at, not less.
Seems these days more states are racist than in the past.

imho

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Roberts/Scalia Supreme Court would vote 5-4 to re-institute slavery if they could.... [View all] TeamPooka Feb 2013 OP

I believe Kennedy will vote to continue the voting act still_one Feb 2013 #1

I would not be so sure Kelvin Mace Feb 2013 #4

'times change' i'll remember that one when the 'gun control' comes before the scotus spanone Feb 2013 #14

good one! treestar Feb 2013 #21

Perhaps, but the questions do not always indicate which way they lean. Except for scala and Thomas still_one Feb 2013 #15

I REALLY, REALLY hope you are right Kelvin Mace Feb 2013 #18

Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #2

founders reminds me of Thomas Jefferson graham4anything Feb 2013 #3

Kennedy's vote is not looking good Kelvin Mace Feb 2013 #5

the second statement is ambiguous graham4anything Feb 2013 #9

I want to believe the legacy thing will "get" Kennedy... CTyankee Feb 2013 #17

Do you know something I don't Kelvin Mace Feb 2013 #19

The Pope just retired, and he is akin to Scalia on the Political chart graham4anything Feb 2013 #20

I am sure that if we could find Kelvin Mace Feb 2013 #24

Thurgood Marshall is NOT Clarence Thomas. Do NOT lump them together. graham4anything Feb 2013 #26

Uh, did you reply to the correct post? Kelvin Mace Feb 2013 #29

You lumped ALL the justices as one graham4anything Feb 2013 #30

It was clear in context Kelvin Mace Feb 2013 #31

We will disagree graham4anything Feb 2013 #32

I'm afraid you're right. Really right-wing out there - and these are the guys a certain small apocalypsehow Feb 2013 #6

I doubt it, but don't let that stop the hyperbole. cali Feb 2013 #7

Gee. Wasn't it just the other day when so many DUers lauded John Roberts for upholding the ACA? Octafish Feb 2013 #8

he did that to support insurance companies as he always backs the corporation from behind the bench. TeamPooka Feb 2013 #10

Crime pays. He helped out during Florida Election Theft 2000, too. Octafish Feb 2013 #12

Justice Scalia's racist comments may result in CJ Roberts siding with the liberals. kiranon Feb 2013 #11

If it goes back to the congress to decide graham4anything Feb 2013 #13

C'mon! That's absurd. Octafish Feb 2013 #16

At times like this I want to revisit Bush stealing the Presidency, and every judicial appt since Coyotl Feb 2013 #22

No they wouldn't. Slavery is too expensive and takes too much effort TheKentuckian Feb 2013 #23

My question. ananda Feb 2013 #25

My response to them? I'm Not Giving Up My Seat Sir JustAnotherGen Feb 2013 #27

I love it CalFresh Feb 2013 #28