Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In POB's Own Words:"Democrats have to accept the need for entitlement reform" [View all]KoKo
(84,711 posts)35. Robert Reich: "The Hoax of Entitlement Reform" 1/6/2013/
The Hoax of Entitlement Reform
Sunday, January 6, 2013
It has become accepted economic wisdom, uttered with deadpan certainty by policy pundits and budget scolds on both sides of the aisle, that the only way to get control over Americas looming deficits is to reform entitlements.
But the accepted wisdom is wrong.
Start with the statistics Republicans trot out at the slightest provocation federal budget data showing a huge spike in direct payments to individuals since the start of 2009, shooting up by almost $600 billion, a 32 percent increase.
And Census data showing 49 percent of Americans living in homes where at least one person is collecting a federal benefit food stamps, unemployment insurance, workers compensation, or subsidized housing up from 44 percent in 2008.
But these expenditures arent driving the federal budget deficit in future years. Theyre temporary. The reason for the spike is Americans got clobbered in 2008 with the worst economic catastrophe since the Great Depression. They and their families have needed whatever helping hands they could get.
If anything, Americas safety nets have been too small and shot through with holes. Thats why the number and percentage of Americans in poverty has increased dramatically, including 22 percent of our children.
What about Social Security and Medicare (along with Medicares poor step-child, Medicaid)?
Social Security wont contribute to future budget deficits. By law, it can only spend money from the Social Security trust fund.
That fund has been in surplus for the better part of two decades, as boomers contributed to it during their working lives. As boomers begin to retire, those current surpluses are disappearing.
Article goes on with MORE...
http://robertreich.org/post/39872465002
Sunday, January 6, 2013
It has become accepted economic wisdom, uttered with deadpan certainty by policy pundits and budget scolds on both sides of the aisle, that the only way to get control over Americas looming deficits is to reform entitlements.
But the accepted wisdom is wrong.
Start with the statistics Republicans trot out at the slightest provocation federal budget data showing a huge spike in direct payments to individuals since the start of 2009, shooting up by almost $600 billion, a 32 percent increase.
And Census data showing 49 percent of Americans living in homes where at least one person is collecting a federal benefit food stamps, unemployment insurance, workers compensation, or subsidized housing up from 44 percent in 2008.
But these expenditures arent driving the federal budget deficit in future years. Theyre temporary. The reason for the spike is Americans got clobbered in 2008 with the worst economic catastrophe since the Great Depression. They and their families have needed whatever helping hands they could get.
If anything, Americas safety nets have been too small and shot through with holes. Thats why the number and percentage of Americans in poverty has increased dramatically, including 22 percent of our children.
What about Social Security and Medicare (along with Medicares poor step-child, Medicaid)?
Social Security wont contribute to future budget deficits. By law, it can only spend money from the Social Security trust fund.
That fund has been in surplus for the better part of two decades, as boomers contributed to it during their working lives. As boomers begin to retire, those current surpluses are disappearing.
Article goes on with MORE...
http://robertreich.org/post/39872465002
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In POB's Own Words:"Democrats have to accept the need for entitlement reform" [View all]
KoKo
Feb 2013
OP
Entitlement reform doesn't mean cuts. There is inefficiency in every government and private company
bluestate10
Feb 2013
#2
I understand. One DU member is lionized for his wild and disingenuous attacks on the
bluestate10
Feb 2013
#19
Right... because democrats are currently unwilling to accept efficient government
whatchamacallit
Feb 2013
#5
What democrats need to accept is that there is some waste in programs that we care about.
bluestate10
Feb 2013
#23
The discussion on the table has nothing to do with waste. It is about making immediate cuts.
robinlynne
Mar 2013
#77
Uh--Democrats need to understand about getting rid of inefficiencies? Literally nonsense.
WinkyDink
Feb 2013
#29
The Chained CPI, which he is willing to consider, IS cuts. We are NOT stupid, at least
sabrina 1
Feb 2013
#40
Perhaps you see a bit more what I've been talking about in our previous discussions
customerserviceguy
Mar 2013
#70
To me, that is becoming a non-Democrat. It is my very definition. I really do not give a rat's
WinkyDink
Mar 2013
#101
The President is an excellent speaker. If he meant to say correcting inefficiency, he COULD SAY IT!
progressoid
Mar 2013
#108
At this point it's MORE THAN disingenuous to equate reform with benefit cuts. I cut my phone bill
uponit7771
Feb 2013
#4
Is the Chained CPI a cut or is it not? If sure isn't 'reform' to any Democrat I know.
sabrina 1
Feb 2013
#42
No, it was borrowed, probably with the intention of stealing it. The fund is receiving
sabrina 1
Mar 2013
#100
Facts don't influence blind emotion. You present facts and logic, many on DU present
bluestate10
Feb 2013
#33
I remember when you said Obama would NEVER try to cut Social Security, and that if he DID,
Marr
Mar 2013
#91
Obama's idea of "balance" is total BULLSHIT. Chained CPI means seniors will go hungry. Does
forestpath
Feb 2013
#10
Oh, gosh. Another crisis. Sigh. Somebody do something. Are we talking about the Y2K crisis?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2013
#15
"Immigration reform and entitlement reform have a lot to do with one another."
ProSense
Feb 2013
#50
I never said the President was proposing it, I am proposing it as are many others
Bjorn Against
Feb 2013
#58
I agree with that, I am disgusted and that is why I am calling for something different
Bjorn Against
Mar 2013
#86
I am very open to entitlement reform, in fact many progressives have pushed reform for years
Bjorn Against
Feb 2013
#36