Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In POB's Own Words:"Democrats have to accept the need for entitlement reform" [View all]Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)86. I agree with that, I am disgusted and that is why I am calling for something different
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In POB's Own Words:"Democrats have to accept the need for entitlement reform" [View all]
KoKo
Feb 2013
OP
Entitlement reform doesn't mean cuts. There is inefficiency in every government and private company
bluestate10
Feb 2013
#2
I understand. One DU member is lionized for his wild and disingenuous attacks on the
bluestate10
Feb 2013
#19
Right... because democrats are currently unwilling to accept efficient government
whatchamacallit
Feb 2013
#5
What democrats need to accept is that there is some waste in programs that we care about.
bluestate10
Feb 2013
#23
The discussion on the table has nothing to do with waste. It is about making immediate cuts.
robinlynne
Mar 2013
#77
Uh--Democrats need to understand about getting rid of inefficiencies? Literally nonsense.
WinkyDink
Feb 2013
#29
The Chained CPI, which he is willing to consider, IS cuts. We are NOT stupid, at least
sabrina 1
Feb 2013
#40
Perhaps you see a bit more what I've been talking about in our previous discussions
customerserviceguy
Mar 2013
#70
To me, that is becoming a non-Democrat. It is my very definition. I really do not give a rat's
WinkyDink
Mar 2013
#101
The President is an excellent speaker. If he meant to say correcting inefficiency, he COULD SAY IT!
progressoid
Mar 2013
#108
At this point it's MORE THAN disingenuous to equate reform with benefit cuts. I cut my phone bill
uponit7771
Feb 2013
#4
Is the Chained CPI a cut or is it not? If sure isn't 'reform' to any Democrat I know.
sabrina 1
Feb 2013
#42
No, it was borrowed, probably with the intention of stealing it. The fund is receiving
sabrina 1
Mar 2013
#100
Facts don't influence blind emotion. You present facts and logic, many on DU present
bluestate10
Feb 2013
#33
I remember when you said Obama would NEVER try to cut Social Security, and that if he DID,
Marr
Mar 2013
#91
Obama's idea of "balance" is total BULLSHIT. Chained CPI means seniors will go hungry. Does
forestpath
Feb 2013
#10
Oh, gosh. Another crisis. Sigh. Somebody do something. Are we talking about the Y2K crisis?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2013
#15
"Immigration reform and entitlement reform have a lot to do with one another."
ProSense
Feb 2013
#50
I never said the President was proposing it, I am proposing it as are many others
Bjorn Against
Feb 2013
#58
I agree with that, I am disgusted and that is why I am calling for something different
Bjorn Against
Mar 2013
#86
I am very open to entitlement reform, in fact many progressives have pushed reform for years
Bjorn Against
Feb 2013
#36