General Discussion

Chan790

(20,176 posts)

71. When Mayer was hired a few months ago...

Fri Mar 1, 2013, 10:22 AM

Mar 2013

she was nothing but vocal she was changing fundamentally how the company operated, if they liked the status quo to leave. There's nothing ambiguous about that...her intent clearly stated was to kick over the apple cart and remake Yahoo! from the foundations, gutting previous corporate culture.

This may be an unpopular decision (and for that matter, I think it's a wrong decision) but you really can't argue that it's unexpected or unfair. If I tell you months in advance that I'm going to do some things you won't like, encourage you to leave and you don't leave then you have no right to be outraged that I do exactly what I said I was going to do. Who, forewarned, stands around waiting to be slapped?

By your logic, nothing would ever change in failing companies; every failing company would be eventually become a failed company...because it's "unfair" to change the rules of a corporate culture.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

83 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

An edict from Her Majesty: Yahoo's CEO betrays her womanhood and workers of both genders [View all] DonCoquixote Feb 2013 OP

It is her ship. If people want to be part of the crew, Roselma Feb 2013 #1

If you are Captain Bligh, Are_grits_groceries Feb 2013 #5

to be fair, she gave them a few months notice -- elehhhhna Mar 2013 #77

thanks for the neoliberal right-wing perspective. like anyone needed to be reminded. HiPointDem Feb 2013 #7

Hilarious! HangOnKids Feb 2013 #10

Just buying into current employer expectations siligut Feb 2013 #20

Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #13

Aren't you just the little corpratist. Very nice. How much are they paying you? nt Ed Suspicious Feb 2013 #16

Ever notice how there's never a good billy goat around when you need one? hatrack Feb 2013 #23

+1000 smirkymonkey Mar 2013 #78

' trim a lot of dead weight to increase productivity/profits.' bowens43 Feb 2013 #27

What conservative rock did this poster crawl out from under? smirkymonkey Mar 2013 #79

One demented business school clich� piled 'pon the last alcibiades_mystery Feb 2013 #28

I think the dead weight is on the bridge of this particular ship Xipe Totec Feb 2013 #29

I bet you'd be great running a sweatshop....don't forget to chain the doors. nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #38

This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #41

Ahhh, the Captain Ahab strategy. bluestate10 Feb 2013 #47

Absolutely! hedgehog Mar 2013 #51

Another admirer of the market who believes they'll be let into the one percent club Kennah Mar 2013 #55

When did YOU become an apologist for the 1%? Ken Burch Mar 2013 #58

When people signed up for her ship, they signed up under different rules gollygee Mar 2013 #60

When Mayer was hired a few months ago... Chan790 Mar 2013 #71

Don't you know corporations are expected to employ people to stimulate the economy... dkf Mar 2013 #63

In case you haven't been paying attention NewJeffCT Mar 2013 #65

I think this is more about unloading a bunch of weak performers as opposed to MADem Feb 2013 #2

The last paragraph davidpdx Mar 2013 #50

So women CEO's can be sociopathic greed-heads just like their male counterparts. KittyWampus Feb 2013 #3

That, my dear, is the only type of woman who is allowed Warpy Feb 2013 #4

as well as the only type of black, asian, native american, gypsy, gay, whatever person who is HiPointDem Feb 2013 #9

No kidding. Warpy Feb 2013 #15

she's on walmart's board, too. HiPointDem Feb 2013 #19

I wonder how giving birth to her little heir to the throne has factored into this n/t deutsey Mar 2013 #68

++++++++++++++++++ Whisp Feb 2013 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #43

+1 mopinko Feb 2013 #37

men too, with rare exceptions 0rganism Feb 2013 #45

+1 HiPointDem Feb 2013 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Feb 2013 #42

I would be embarrassed if I did that in her position renate Feb 2013 #6

She's part of the new aristocracy deutsey Mar 2013 #70

As an fyi, the change hours in effect on June 1st Godhumor Mar 2013 #73

Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #11

What fraction of other companies let people work from home? Donald Ian Rankin Feb 2013 #12

Don it is 2013 you can Google for the answer n/t HangOnKids Feb 2013 #14

I would agree with you if she didn't take expensive perks for herself. randome Feb 2013 #32

It's not unusual in Silicon Valley Gormy Cuss Feb 2013 #44

wfh = unusual?!? uponit7771 Mar 2013 #54

She hired a bunch of people with the understanding that they could work from home gollygee Mar 2013 #61

Twenty-first century calling for you on line one. (nt) Posteritatis Mar 2013 #80

Is she related to Mitt? condoleeza Feb 2013 #18

They share three mothers in common. nt Xipe Totec Feb 2013 #31

Just goes to show that having a 1%er attitude is not gender specific CanonRay Feb 2013 #21

Precisely... KansDem Mar 2013 #57

If they ever had any ideals...other than getting stinking rich, that is. CanonRay Mar 2013 #59

She's conducting a lay-off without calling it that.... OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #22

And it will disproportionately affect women. We shouldn't be reducing the number of women CTyankee Feb 2013 #25

She doesn't seem to care, does she? nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #35

No, she doesn't. She is being very selfish and short sighted. CTyankee Feb 2013 #36

Ah, good point davidpdx Mar 2013 #49

Telecommuting was something less than a runaway success here Sen. Walter Sobchak Feb 2013 #24

Then that is a management problem. If there are people underperforming then there are ways CTyankee Feb 2013 #26

It wasn't a performance issue, Sen. Walter Sobchak Feb 2013 #30

I hope that doesn't happen with us bettyellen Feb 2013 #33

If the job requires more face to face meetings that should be a job requirement, it seems to me. CTyankee Feb 2013 #34

It wasn't a need for face to face meetings per say Sen. Walter Sobchak Feb 2013 #39

I realize that men want to telecommute, too, and that is fine. CTyankee Feb 2013 #40

"people don't know the other parts beyond CC's on emails." Heywood J Mar 2013 #66

But we aren't a large business, Sen. Walter Sobchak Mar 2013 #75

Then, there should have been a minimum internet standard NewJeffCT Mar 2013 #67

The standard was poorly articulated as "broadband" Sen. Walter Sobchak Mar 2013 #74

I have similar experience with telecommuting. It isn't efficient in my line of work. bluestate10 Feb 2013 #48

if she really wanted to get ahead of the game... 0rganism Feb 2013 #46

+1 uponit7771 Mar 2013 #53

Watch her bottom line increase by 5 - 10%, I worked in an environment that was 100% telecommute ... uponit7771 Mar 2013 #52

The issue is not as much about telecommute DonCoquixote Mar 2013 #56

She also just told her TOP employees to start looking for new jobs. JoePhilly Mar 2013 #62

I agree DonCoquixote Mar 2013 #72

Most people in this world do have to come into work mainer Mar 2013 #64

What makes you think work from home KatyMan Mar 2013 #83

"I can't be a feminist because I'm not a shrill bitch." Nine Mar 2013 #69

But then again ismnotwasm Mar 2013 #76

She is just anothe disgusting, elitist pig. smirkymonkey Mar 2013 #81

Hard to believe Marissa Antoinette Mayer donated to the DNC. N/t alp227 Mar 2013 #82