Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why do Obama and Pelosi keep perpetuating the mandate to reform Social Security and Medicare? [View all]patrice
(47,992 posts)2. Perhaps they are trying to drive the unions together . . . ? nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why do Obama and Pelosi keep perpetuating the mandate to reform Social Security and Medicare? [View all]
TheProgressive
Mar 2013
OP
Actually, because some "reform" to both systems is needed. That does not mean
kelliekat44
Mar 2013
#45
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the "reform" on the table is switching to the chained CPI
MannyGoldstein
Mar 2013
#137
Oh, Manny, maybe by reform they mean to increase the monthly payments.
Jackpine Radical
Mar 2013
#60
Don't unions need one another? Yeah, it's not the right tack for some of them, but others
patrice
Mar 2013
#13
BTW, the phrase is "... couldn't care less ..." if they "could care less" that means that they care.
patrice
Mar 2013
#21
You may have noticed that I mentioned a couple of things that are driving unions apart.
patrice
Mar 2013
#70
because they are corporate lapdogs who do as they' like nearly everyone else in national politics....
bowens43
Mar 2013
#3
I asked about SS and Medicare. Not HC, what do those programs have to do with
sabrina 1
Mar 2013
#28
True, but none of it had anything to do with the specific cause of the deficit.
sabrina 1
Mar 2013
#36
This should all be its own OP. This info is too important for people to miss in a reply. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2013
#96
Weeeee, a 25% drop in "donut hole" costs by 2020, how will that cut the deficit?
just1voice
Mar 2013
#102
"All America needs to do ..." "...they could care less ..." = absurdities. Talking as though what's
patrice
Mar 2013
#19
That's your phrasing, you should explain it, because it is absurdly over-simplified. nt
patrice
Mar 2013
#35
And of course, you are saying CONGRESS should do these things, because presidents aren't kings. nt
patrice
Mar 2013
#57
... presidents aren't kings AND they don't write legislation, but then, I bet you know that. nt
patrice
Mar 2013
#58
So specify the legislative process, resources (including persons) & timeline, since it's so simple.
patrice
Mar 2013
#67
"Do they think we are stupid?" That's a stupid question ..and yes they do think we are that stupid.
L0oniX
Mar 2013
#26
Do you have a link for that piece of misinformation? Because everything I read about
Cleita
Mar 2013
#84
Get this through your head. The deficit is not the problem of the Social Security trust fund.
Cleita
Mar 2013
#88
It is a default on a debt, and the American citizens are the biggest holder of Federal debt
Samantha
Mar 2013
#139
Also, this is just a ploy to turn the SS fund over to Wall Street and privatize it.
Cleita
Mar 2013
#92
Forget it Cleita, I have been down this road with him, he believes in Enron style accounting
Dragonfli
Mar 2013
#132
Implement Single Payer for Health Care; and CUT THE DAMN DOD by 50% at LEAST!!!
on point
Mar 2013
#47
Why? To make themselves appear to be reasonable and accommodating to those GOPers....
OldDem2012
Mar 2013
#48
Political maneuvers are too complicated for people that look at the world...
Comrade_McKenzie
Mar 2013
#49
You don't get it. The Beltway Media are the ones that are pushing it....
Spitfire of ATJ
Mar 2013
#52
Correct. Odd how people appear to think corporate personhood is actively ONLY elsewhere, not ever
patrice
Mar 2013
#63
Yep, Just wait, you all think you're screwed now, just wait until you become disabled, like me...
starzdust22
Mar 2013
#62
You ask why? I will tell you why! Obama and the Democrats answer to the same boss as Boner and
Dustlawyer
Mar 2013
#77
Redeeming the trust fund to pay benefits will not significantly increase annual deficits...
TheProgressive
Mar 2013
#104
Mayeb because people will vote for them whether they are on the side of people
truedelphi
Mar 2013
#85
The "trust fund" is like me writing an IOU to myself for $2 million, placing it in a safe-deposit
Nye Bevan
Mar 2013
#97
Well the SS Trust Fund has $2.7 trillion invested in the safest investment in the world...
TheProgressive
Mar 2013
#107
So how about the government simply issues $100 trillion of Treasuries to the trust fund,
Nye Bevan
Mar 2013
#109
Why yes I do. But I am not the one claiming that "There is no problems with Social Security". (nt)
Nye Bevan
Mar 2013
#113
Well I am confused that first you claim that "There is no problems with Social Security", period,
Nye Bevan
Mar 2013
#117
If you really cared then you'd address the President's seemingly weekly swipes and threats
TheKentuckian
Mar 2013
#128
"The shepherd always tries to persuade the sheep that their interests and his own are the same."
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2013
#135
That's the sequester. What about the offers from Obama and Pelosi to advert the sequester...
TheProgressive
Mar 2013
#141
That's a matter of interpretation from media reports that differ from reality.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#143
The "Fix" for raising medical costs is UNIVERSAL SINGLE PAYER. Anyone who suggests
Vincardog
Mar 2013
#145