Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
8. The difference between middle class and upper class isn't income, it's wealth.
Fri Mar 1, 2013, 02:49 PM
Mar 2013

I know lawyers who make $150k a year and certainly aren't upper class or "rich". On the other hand, I know a guy who makes about $50k a year and has more wealth than everyone on DU combined. He works because he chooses to.

The difference between middle and upper class is your dependence on that income for survival. If you make $150k a year and would be bankrupted if you lost your job, you're middle class. If you make $150k a year and have enough in the bank to maintain your current lifestyle after that income is cut off, you're wealthy.

The difference between middle class and upper class isn't decided by your paycheck, it's decided by your bank statement (or, more accurately, your portfolio).

Now, there's clearly a point where this can break down. A playboy might make and blow a million bucks in a year. He's wealthy, but the difference is that he's making the choice to blow his wealth. That's probably not the case with someone making $200k a year (I'm sure there are exceptions, but generally).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I've always scratch my head when I see people say $200k/yr is middle class. octothorpe Mar 2013 #1
Honestly, while I would be thrilled to have that salary, Proles Mar 2013 #25
Way to miss the point. Ruby the Liberal Mar 2013 #44
What It Means, Sir, Is That 'Middle Class' as Generally Used Is Obfuscation And Deception The Magistrate Mar 2013 #2
Agree with most of this... YoungDemCA Mar 2013 #5
Those fit into the doctor and lawyer examples, IMO (nt) jeff47 Mar 2013 #12
There Is Something To That, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2013 #17
There's also now a large group of Americans who make a very good living in entertainment. KittyWampus Mar 2013 #22
No, there aren't. Their numbers have grown, but they are an insignificant percentage. Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #33
And Sports. KittyWampus Mar 2013 #35
Not even close. Add every member of every professional team in every sport and you Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #39
I have a nephew that related a story about his friends (a couple) R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2013 #3
Middle class in their minds nachosgrande Mar 2013 #4
Has nothing to do with 'heavy taxes' and everything to do with high cost of living. nt stevenleser Mar 2013 #26
I agree, that's why us on the lower end, need to rethink this 99% Puzzledtraveller Mar 2013 #6
I think it could be considered "middle class" in the sense of "labor class" phantom power Mar 2013 #7
The difference between middle class and upper class isn't income, it's wealth. Xithras Mar 2013 #8
That's the distinction right there spinbaby Mar 2013 #13
I've also often been confused when people will say certain professions don't pay well riderinthestorm Mar 2013 #9
When I see these numbers, I doubt that I am alive. Perhaps I'm only a hallucination. freshwest Mar 2013 #10
I live in one of the JustAnotherGen Mar 2013 #11
You know what the real point of getting people to debate whether or not 200K is middle class is? winter is coming Mar 2013 #14
Exactly. I point to the 1955 tax brackets to make that point (inflation adjusted) JHB Mar 2013 #27
$200k a year sulphurdunn Mar 2013 #15
$200K, give or take, is the top end of the middle third of the income distribution Recursion Mar 2013 #16
The most revealing thing about present circumstances Tsiyu Mar 2013 #18
It all depends on what you mean by "middle class" FreeJoe Mar 2013 #19
Here, let the WSJ explain it to you ... dawg Mar 2013 #20
Where the hell did they get these examples? n/t Ron Green Mar 2013 #24
I'm working on the assumption the WSJ has a pretty good handle on, Sen. Walter Sobchak Mar 2013 #29
They pulled them ... dawg Mar 2013 #30
Who doesn't have an annual retirement income of $180,000? Ruby the Liberal Mar 2013 #45
That there is a broad middle class is an illusion. Paul E Ester Mar 2013 #21
Another definitional quandary dmallind Mar 2013 #23
Good post... cbrer Mar 2013 #36
I like how you put this. octothorpe Mar 2013 #43
Well stated! Ruby the Liberal Mar 2013 #46
It used to be $90K for a family of four was middle class KurtNYC Mar 2013 #28
The 1% are the problem. I have no problem with those making $200,000. They are not pampango Mar 2013 #31
They should be but, by and large, they are not. Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #32
I believe that Romney won the $200,000+ folks by about 55%-45%. You are right that pampango Mar 2013 #34
I guess that makes my wife and me "untypical". cbrer Mar 2013 #37
Well you're here, so that makes you atypical, your household income is in the top 10%, that Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #40
They are easily within the top 5% Demo_Chris Mar 2013 #41
The answer to that question is "working class" Spider Jerusalem Mar 2013 #38
This guy explained it well: bvar22 Mar 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If an income of $200k/yea...»Reply #8