Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Well, the austerity scam worked. Now on to education. [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)34. Whoa! That was mind blowing!
Last edited Sat Mar 2, 2013, 02:38 AM - Edit history (1)
Obama doesn't want the cuts!!!!!
War is Peace.
Freedom is Slavery.
Ignorance is Strength.
And Obama is desperately AGAINST cuts to Social Security!
Psssst. Someone had better tell Obama, because there is something really, really weird going on. He has a mysterious double around Washington who seems bent and determined on not only proposing them REPEATEDLY, but giving soaring public speeches about how necessary they are and how liberals need to get over themselves and swallow those peas!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022442981
In POB's Own Words:"Democrats have to accept the need for entitlement reform"
KoKo
Last edited Thu Feb 28, 2013, 07:45 PM USA/ET - Edit history (3)
President Obama Speaks at a Business Council Dinner
February 27, 2013 | 9:26 | Public Domain
President Obama delivers remarks to the Business Council during a dinner.
Park Hyatt Hotel
Washington, D.C.
#t=0sWhat we should be doing -- and what I've been calling for repeatedly over the last not just several months, but several years -- is a balanced approach to deficit reduction that combines some tough spending cuts, particularly focused on how do we deal with long-term trends on some of our entitlement programs, and a tax reform agenda that without raising tax rates further could in fact raise sufficient revenues that combined would yield about $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction over the next decade; would replace the sequester; would bring our deficit-to-GDP ratios below the 3 percent threshold that we need for stabilization; that would stabilize our debt-to-GDP ratios for the next decade; and would lay the groundwork for more expansive growth because we would have simplified our tax system, closed some loopholes, broadened our base, seen an opportunity for corporate tax reform that could also make the whole system more sensible and give you guys a more competitive posture internationally. That's what we should be doing.
OKAY...SO GOOD SO FAR......
Now, you'll be happy to know that that's what I offered to my Republican friends back in December after my election, before the fiscal cliff. Many of you were involved in voicing support for such a balanced approach, even if you didn't sign on to every detail and every line item in our recommended budget. And what I've said is that that continues to be the offer on the table. I am prepared to make some tough decisions, some of which will garner some significant frustration on the part of members of my party, but I think its the right thing to do.
What I cant do is to abide by a set of decisions here in Washington that would put the entire burden of deficit reduction on our seniors -- making their health care more expensive; students -- that would make their student loans and going to college more expensive; that would gut our investments in education and research and infrastructure -- all the foundations for long-term growth.. Thats not what were going to do, because it wouldnt be good for the country and, frankly, it would not be good for your businesses.
's for this one...
BUT THEN HE SAYS:
Now, the question then becomes how do we get from here to there. And I was telling Andrew before we came out the issue is not technical, the issue is political. And the question is whether or not we are going to see a willingness on the part of all parties to compromise in a meaningful way. And what that means is Democrats have to accept the need for entitlement reform. But it also means that Republicans have to accept the need for additional revenues if were going to be able to actually close this deficit and provide the kind of certainty that you need to make your long-term investments.
Whether that can be done in the next two days -- I havent seen things done in two days here in Washington in quite some time. On the other hand, the good news is that I think the public is beginning to pay attention to this, and one thing Im certain about is that the country as a whole is weary of Washington for presiding over a manufactured crisis every three months. Its not good for business confidence. Its certainly not good for consumer confidence. Its unnecessary.
"Not Good for Business Confidence...Not good for Consumer Confidence. It's unnecessary." (Why is it always about BUSINESS and CONSUMERS?"WE ARE THE PEOPLE!
MORE at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2013/02/27/president-obama-speaks-business-council-dinner#transcript
Man, the denial is thick and brazen. You can't make this stuff up.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yup. We're being bled to death to enrich a priveleged few and all we can
ChisolmTrailDem
Mar 2013
#2
Rahm is =still= working to privatize schools in Chicago, even after the huge teacher's strike!
Fire Walk With Me
Mar 2013
#3
I remember when the nation had problems to solve. Now we have unsolvable "crises" to frighten us.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2013
#8
Chile was the laboratory for restructuring European and now N. American economies and societies
leveymg
Mar 2013
#64
That failure was understood in the late '80s when Bush Sr. and the IMF allowed Pinochet to topple
leveymg
Mar 2013
#76
It couldn't be one of those from a pay-to-play politicial system, could it?
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#21
Agreed. Of course, some will continue to say that he's just playing 5-dimensional chess, it's all
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#23
When a person such as yourself uses the phrase "diarrhea of the mouth," that indicates that they
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#37
Should have taken the fiscal cliff in Jan so we at least got a real tax increase on the 1%...
on point
Mar 2013
#17
Thank you for posting this. The links that you included, of course, verify exactly what is said.
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#25