Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(127,130 posts)
18. I rather doubt it. The round trip is 70+ weeks, and life support
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 04:10 PM
Mar 2013

requires flawless delivery of air, food, and water, flawless temperature control, and flawless waste handling for that entire period. This adds enormous mass and hence increases the technical problems. Available cabin space would be minimal, and communications would be very slow. Moreover, no one has ever spent that much time continually in space, and very long-term zero-gravity effects on the body could be quite substantial

There are many possibilities for potentially fatal problems: List of spaceflight-related accidents and incidents


Mars mission poses greater risk to human life than Nasa would allow
Crew on Dennis Tito's Mars mission will face unprecedented dangers – and time is too tight for the usual test flights
Ian Sample, science correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Friday 1 March 2013 09.36 EST

... Tito has assembled an experienced group to plan and advise on the adventure, they must still develop life-support systems and radiation protection, and heat shields to withstand a re-entry that will be twice as fast as any other return to Earth. Then they must buy and modify a rocket and capsule for the mission, with no time for test flights ... "On survival rations you can do it, but there's not much margin for error," said Ojha. Fuel, liquid oxygen and water tanks would be held in a service module attached behind the crew capsule ... On a typical voyage to and from Mars – which would be longer than Tito's planned trip – estimates suggest the crew has a 10% chance of experiencing at least one fatal SEP event, and more than a 30% chance of exposure to a blast that would kill 35% of people in 50 days. Fortunately, the proposed launch date of 5 January 2018 is when solar activity is near its lowest, and when SEPs are correspondingly less intense and less frequent ...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Or will the man end up on Mars...and the woman on Venus? pinboy3niner Feb 2013 #1
I've seen a lot of these private space ventures come and go LongTomH Feb 2013 #2
This isn't a start-up venture, it's a philanthropic venture bananas Mar 2013 #9
Well, I nominate Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.... n/t Still Sensible Feb 2013 #3
In nominate Dick Cheney and Rush Limbaugh SummerSnow Feb 2013 #4
It would be a huge savings in rocket fuel LadyHawkAZ Mar 2013 #14
This is real and doable Neurotica Feb 2013 #5
Agreed on the risk. I'm skeptical about this but I really don't want to be. (nt) Posteritatis Feb 2013 #6
What a complete and total waste. Robots take so much less resources/weight & benefit KittyWampus Feb 2013 #7
If somebody is willing and able to pay for it, chances are somebody will be willing to do it. dairydog91 Feb 2013 #8
Are Carnival Cruises far behind? Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2013 #10
The money would be much better spent Shankapotomus Mar 2013 #11
Biospheres on Mars have a lot of advantages bananas Mar 2013 #12
I have to agree Shankapotomus Mar 2013 #13
Maybe not a good idea just yet. Separation Mar 2013 #15
Even if it doesn't impact, it could still take out the orbiters bananas Mar 2013 #20
I want to pick which two Spirochete Mar 2013 #16
I nominate the Kochroach Bros. meow2u3 Mar 2013 #17
I rather doubt it. The round trip is 70+ weeks, and life support struggle4progress Mar 2013 #18
"President Kennedy, when will we put a man on the moon?" cherokeeprogressive Mar 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In 5 years, we're going t...»Reply #18