Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,564 posts)
5. Of course.
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 11:36 PM
Mar 2013

Then again, the article talks of fellow Americans as though they were somehow some strange species not fully investigated. That let's you know that they're operating from ignorance.

"We" understand others if we bother to communicate with them, hobnob with them, and think of them as our fellows and equals. Considering how many hundreds of thousands of "those people" there are, possibly millions of them, you'd think they could find one that would speak of themselves in a moderately self-introspective fashion. Instead they figure it's better to pay an outsider.

Whenever an outsider tries to characterize the motives and goals of a group, they usually put things in their own terms and frame them in terms of their own values for their own goals, not that of the group under study.

And some outsiders think that a few minutes' work can reveal greater insights than those in the group itself have. Next up: Narcissistic Personality Disorder among Reporters and Media Writers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fear factor: The cycle th...»Reply #5