Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Did Occupy Oakland Believe Their Move-In Day Would Succeed? [View all]joshcryer
(62,536 posts)65. It passed their General Assembly, so a majority of them must have thought it would work.
I think it's a mixture of wild eyed optimism and ignorance, imo. I think they thought if they had enough mass numbers they'd achieve victory, I mean, what cops are going to rest 400-500 people? They were wrong.
It was, in my opinion, a strategic failure, but not because they were stupid, they just didn't consider the results of their actions. A better route would've been to do it covertly, over a short period of time, and without a big fuss about it.
The Move-In Day March was pure strategic failing. The building should've been secured long beforehand and its location should've been kept secret. It should've been a dozen or two people at most, at which point the occupiers could've been called to join.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The thugs are the ones who started with the violence from the begining of ows. The protesters
SammyWinstonJack
Jan 2012
#30
As long as they are continually getting publicity and comments/reactions from official,
morningfog
Jan 2012
#46
Ya know, that aint a half bad idea. All the Occupy protestors wear a shirt plainly labeled, LIBERAL
WingDinger
Jan 2012
#17
I'd say they failed to take over the building because our society HAS broken down
Capitalocracy
Jan 2012
#18
Yes, they could've used M-16s, but that doesn't make what they've been doing acceptable.
Capitalocracy
Jan 2012
#36
And they did not get the Pentagon off the ground. It was not the point to do so.
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2012
#39
I suppose there's no sense trying to do anything unless there's a 100% chance of unqualified success
gratuitous
Jan 2012
#22
The odds were much in favor of the attempted takeover as ending the way it did.
randome
Jan 2012
#24
No, I'm not saying that at all. If that were true, few of the large protests I
MineralMan
Jan 2012
#25
Isn't this EXACTLY what the right does that drives us crazy? Or is it OK to be an apologist as long
renie408
Jan 2012
#51
It passed their General Assembly, so a majority of them must have thought it would work.
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#65