Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
It seems that this weekend you are obsessed with SS Angry Dragon Mar 2013 #1
All the people insisting it not be touched. dkf Mar 2013 #2
I'm concerned, if a bunch of money was borrowed from the SS trust fund, can we pretend that patrice Mar 2013 #3
Here is my take on SS Angry Dragon Mar 2013 #5
Agreed about CPI, even for someone who'd be willing to consider a slow down in the patrice Mar 2013 #12
I am still waiting for dkf to respond to any questions I have asked them over the last two days Angry Dragon Mar 2013 #14
If CPI includes medical costs then decreasing medical costs decreases CPI based payments Progressive dog Mar 2013 #28
Thanks for this. nt patrice Mar 2013 #31
Why chained CPI instead of CPI-E then? AnnaLee Mar 2013 #36
The payroll tax holiday was paid for by adding the cost to the federal budget. dkf Mar 2013 #15
Re: your header... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #16
Honestly I didn't understand the mechanics back then. dkf Mar 2013 #18
No, silly... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #25
Which is the mechanics of it. dkf Mar 2013 #26
I wonder why you refuse to answer the questions put to you?? Angry Dragon Mar 2013 #17
Depends if the angry dragon savings account holds savings or... dkf Mar 2013 #21
What a bunch of bull Angry Dragon Mar 2013 #22
What a bunch of malarkey Progressive dog Mar 2013 #27
I think that is precisely what they want to confuse people into believing. AnnaLee Mar 2013 #37
I for one would rather have 20 years of certainty in NO CAT FOOD Progressive dog Mar 2013 #30
Silence? = Those $110K-? incomes are too marginal to take the hit? patrice Mar 2013 #9
Why would raising the cap be a problem? Why not? patrice Mar 2013 #4
I never said that the cap should not be raised Angry Dragon Mar 2013 #8
Well, I think all of us agree about that. Does raising the cap assume that it is part of the budget patrice Mar 2013 #10
A large part of the problem is that republicans want to include anything about SS to be Angry Dragon Mar 2013 #11
True, SS doesn't have anything to do with the discretionary budget management end of it and it patrice Mar 2013 #20
It is smart politics. AnnaLee Mar 2013 #38
Lift the SS earnings cap altogether. Will solve several problems simultaneously. leveymg Mar 2013 #6
When he was campaigning, Obama pandered that he wanted to raise the cap brentspeak Mar 2013 #7
"Today"? "Only"? Not so. riqster Mar 2013 #13
Ok, then link us to where Obama has said otherwise. brentspeak Mar 2013 #23
Done. riqster Mar 2013 #32
That's it? brentspeak Mar 2013 #33
You said that all Obama was talking about was chained CPI riqster Mar 2013 #35
I'm sure the rich will pass the bills. PHFFFFFFFFTT (sound of large long fart in the key of F major) L0oniX Mar 2013 #19
Tell me that raising the cap doesn't have anything to do with incomes that, while you and I would patrice Mar 2013 #24
Congress and senate will not care as long as they get campaign fundng from Exxon, United, ect... L0oniX Mar 2013 #29
The Cap should be eliminated. That is the only fair solution. nt bluestate10 Mar 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There are bills in the ho...»Reply #23