Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(116,464 posts)

3. Does it have to be either or?

Sun Mar 3, 2013, 03:49 PM

Mar 2013

The bill cuts agricultural subsidies and defense. Wall Street, Big Oil and other subsidies are OK too.

Should the sequester be repealed or replaced?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should the sequester be repealed or replaced? [View all] ProSense Mar 2013 OP

The area to cut is painfully obvious and completely solves the "problem" : Fire Walk With Me Mar 2013 #1

makes sense to me. . . . n/t annabanana Mar 2013 #2

Does it have to be either or? ProSense Mar 2013 #3

It should be utterly ignored and the real problems solved. Fire Walk With Me Mar 2013 #4

Do you understand what that number represents? dkf Mar 2013 #5

Let it ride. I'm curious to see what happens. Throd Mar 2013 #6