Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Who should lead the Democratic Party in 2016 [View all]cali
(114,904 posts)57. of course statehouse politics counts. duh
it's engaging in the mechanics of a campaign. It's getting out there amongst voters. It's being involved in the nitty gritty of politics. It counts a helll of a lot.
I hate to break this to you, hon, but being a scholar doesn't count for shit in politics. Not when it comes to the electorate and the largely anti intellectual streak in this country that's a mile wide.
Warren is not a natural when it comes to politicking and she doesn't have much experience with it and she sure as shit doesn't have the coalitions behind her that you need to mount a successful national campaign.
This is like ABC stuff. It's duh stuff. It's as fucking basic as it gets.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've known nationally-recognized scholars who would make piss-poor Presidents.
winter is coming
Mar 2013
#40
That would assume that the Dem Establishment wouldn't marginalize and ridicule them
Lydia Leftcoast
Mar 2013
#65
As much as I like & admire Elizabeth I don't think she could win the 2016 election....
Little Star
Mar 2013
#7
]"History has tried to teach us that we can't have good government under politicians
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2013
#10
I only wish your poll had asked who do you think has the best shot of winning instead of...
Little Star
Mar 2013
#30
Richard Trumka for Prez, Paul Krugman for VP, Elizabeth Warren for Senate MAJORITY leader
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#33
Here are the current Senators - a fine collection of inexperience and has-beens.
FarCenter
Mar 2013
#35
If there's any hope of preserving the progress made over the past four years,
name not needed
Mar 2013
#46
Lydia the Tatooed Lady will do if she's running against the 2016 Republican nominee
Rowdyboy
Mar 2013
#48
Andrew Cuomo, Martin O'Malley, Brian Schweitzer and Joe Biden are all considering runs.
brooklynite
Mar 2013
#86
First Lady, Senator, Sec State, international respect ... that's one hell of a resume.
Demo_Chris
Mar 2013
#90
At this point the best chance to avoid yet another moderate republican is a celebrity.
Egalitarian Thug
Mar 2013
#84
Hillary45/Janet Napolitano or Hillary45/Biden or Hillary45/Jerry Brown
graham4anything
Mar 2013
#105