Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Other than the European theatre of World War II, can you name any MAJOR examples [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)7. Here:
West Wing Week: "Dispatches from Sudan"
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/02/02/west-wing-week-dispatches-sudan
Jimmy Carter, Senator Kerry, Kofi Annan/Sudan Vote
http://www.filmannex.com/movie/jimmy-carter-senator-kerry-kofi-annansudan-vote/23967
Enough Project Welcomes John Kerry as Secretary of State; Urges His Continued Support on Sudan, Congo, and LRA
http://www.enoughproject.org/blogs/kerry-secretary-state-sudan-congo-lra
Whenever people talk foreign policy, it's always about war. There is a better way.
Feed the Future is the United States Government's global hunger and food security initiative
http://www.feedthefuture.gov/
This follows the President's nomination of Jim Kim to the World Bank.
Krugman on Kim:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/02/02/west-wing-week-dispatches-sudan
Jimmy Carter, Senator Kerry, Kofi Annan/Sudan Vote
http://www.filmannex.com/movie/jimmy-carter-senator-kerry-kofi-annansudan-vote/23967
Enough Project Welcomes John Kerry as Secretary of State; Urges His Continued Support on Sudan, Congo, and LRA
http://www.enoughproject.org/blogs/kerry-secretary-state-sudan-congo-lra
Whenever people talk foreign policy, it's always about war. There is a better way.
Feed the Future is the United States Government's global hunger and food security initiative
http://www.feedthefuture.gov/
Esther Duflo
by Daniel Gross
Obama taps povertys rock star.
in the first week of January, most of Americas best-known economists were in San Diego, thronging the American Economic Associations annual meeting at the Manchester Grand Hyatt resort. But one of the professions sharpest young economic minds, Esther Duflo, was off doing fieldwork in India.
Duflo, 40, is enjoying quite a run. Born and raised in France, she arrived at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1995 to pursue a Ph.D.; in 2009 she won a MacArthur genius grant; then in 2010 took home the John Bates Clark Medal, given to the best economist under the age of 40. Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty, coauthored with her partner (and father of her child), Abhijit V. Banerjee, won the 2011 Financial Times/Goldman Sachs Business Book of the Year Award. And then in late December, she was nominated for a post on the White Houses new Global Development Council, an entity designed to rationalize the governments approach to foreign aid. Shes an absolute rock star, said Dean Karlan, professor of economics at Yale University and a colleague. Shes a great example of the new wave of development economistspeople who are really bright and dedicated to theory, but are driven by improving the world around them.
Development economics has long been a contentious field tied up with geopolitics, ideology, and bitter, ego-driven feuds. Duflo and her colleagues have sought to defuse the dispute between what they call the supply wallahsfolks like Columbias Jeffrey Sachs who believe that the poor simply need more resourcesand the demand wallahs, experts like New York Universitys William Easterly who believe that top-down aid programs dont work.
Instead of endlessly debating ideology, Duflo and company pursue empirical evidence. The method they embrace is the scientific one, employing randomized trials, with one group of patients getting the economic treatment, the other a placebo. As Duflo put it: If we dont know whether [aid is] doing any good, we are not any better than the medieval doctors and their leeches.
- more -
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2013/01/13/obama-taps-esther-duflo-poverty-s-rock-star.html
by Daniel Gross
Obama taps povertys rock star.
in the first week of January, most of Americas best-known economists were in San Diego, thronging the American Economic Associations annual meeting at the Manchester Grand Hyatt resort. But one of the professions sharpest young economic minds, Esther Duflo, was off doing fieldwork in India.
Duflo, 40, is enjoying quite a run. Born and raised in France, she arrived at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1995 to pursue a Ph.D.; in 2009 she won a MacArthur genius grant; then in 2010 took home the John Bates Clark Medal, given to the best economist under the age of 40. Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty, coauthored with her partner (and father of her child), Abhijit V. Banerjee, won the 2011 Financial Times/Goldman Sachs Business Book of the Year Award. And then in late December, she was nominated for a post on the White Houses new Global Development Council, an entity designed to rationalize the governments approach to foreign aid. Shes an absolute rock star, said Dean Karlan, professor of economics at Yale University and a colleague. Shes a great example of the new wave of development economistspeople who are really bright and dedicated to theory, but are driven by improving the world around them.
Development economics has long been a contentious field tied up with geopolitics, ideology, and bitter, ego-driven feuds. Duflo and her colleagues have sought to defuse the dispute between what they call the supply wallahsfolks like Columbias Jeffrey Sachs who believe that the poor simply need more resourcesand the demand wallahs, experts like New York Universitys William Easterly who believe that top-down aid programs dont work.
Instead of endlessly debating ideology, Duflo and company pursue empirical evidence. The method they embrace is the scientific one, employing randomized trials, with one group of patients getting the economic treatment, the other a placebo. As Duflo put it: If we dont know whether [aid is] doing any good, we are not any better than the medieval doctors and their leeches.
- more -
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2013/01/13/obama-taps-esther-duflo-poverty-s-rock-star.html
This follows the President's nomination of Jim Kim to the World Bank.
Doctor's World Bank Nomination Signals Renewed Development Focus
By: Ray Suarez
President Obama announced the nomination of Dr. Jim Yong Kim, a physician and the president of Dartmouth College, to the presidency of the World Bank on Friday. If confirmed, Kim would succeed Robert Zoellick as the leader of this important lending institution based in Washington, D.C. The nod must come as a surprise to bank watchers around the world. Kim's name had not appeared on any short lists circulating in the media in the weeks leading up to the appointment deadline.
Kim would succeed a long line of economists and career government employees at the helm of the World Bank, which was created in the waning days of the WWII to begin the rebuilding of a ravaged world.
So, why not a central banker? Why not a career economist? Why not a conventional "green eyeshade" guy or gal to run the place? Zoellick's tenure at the bank capped a long economics career in and out of government service: Treasury Department deputy assistant secretary for Financial Institution Policy, executive vice president of Fannie Mae, U.S. trade representative.
<...>
Considering the bank's role as an international economic development agency, the selection of Kim over, for example, former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, starts to make more sense. Kim is a co-founder and former executive director of Partners in Health, which has grown from its focus on rural Haiti to implementing programs across the world's poorest countries aimed at improving basic health services. The Harvard-education physician served two years as head of the World Health Organization's HIV/AIDS department and has been an international leader in anti-tuberculosis policy. Kim is also a co-founder of the Global Health Delivery Project, which seeks to build new systems for providing basic health services to populations in poverty.
- more -
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2012/03/obama-administration-nominates-jim-yong-kim-to-lead-world-bank.html
By: Ray Suarez
President Obama announced the nomination of Dr. Jim Yong Kim, a physician and the president of Dartmouth College, to the presidency of the World Bank on Friday. If confirmed, Kim would succeed Robert Zoellick as the leader of this important lending institution based in Washington, D.C. The nod must come as a surprise to bank watchers around the world. Kim's name had not appeared on any short lists circulating in the media in the weeks leading up to the appointment deadline.
Kim would succeed a long line of economists and career government employees at the helm of the World Bank, which was created in the waning days of the WWII to begin the rebuilding of a ravaged world.
So, why not a central banker? Why not a career economist? Why not a conventional "green eyeshade" guy or gal to run the place? Zoellick's tenure at the bank capped a long economics career in and out of government service: Treasury Department deputy assistant secretary for Financial Institution Policy, executive vice president of Fannie Mae, U.S. trade representative.
<...>
Considering the bank's role as an international economic development agency, the selection of Kim over, for example, former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, starts to make more sense. Kim is a co-founder and former executive director of Partners in Health, which has grown from its focus on rural Haiti to implementing programs across the world's poorest countries aimed at improving basic health services. The Harvard-education physician served two years as head of the World Health Organization's HIV/AIDS department and has been an international leader in anti-tuberculosis policy. Kim is also a co-founder of the Global Health Delivery Project, which seeks to build new systems for providing basic health services to populations in poverty.
- more -
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2012/03/obama-administration-nominates-jim-yong-kim-to-lead-world-bank.html
Krugman on Kim:
...But when I heard about the (inspired) choice of Jim Kim for the Banks presidency, I immediately saw it. Kim is a co-founder of Partners in Health, an organization profiled in Tracy Kidders Mountains Beyond Mountains.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/arcade-fire-and-the-world-bank/
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/arcade-fire-and-the-world-bank/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Other than the European theatre of World War II, can you name any MAJOR examples [View all]
Ken Burch
Mar 2013
OP
Civil war was not fought for the poor, or the slaves, or any other "little people". n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Mar 2013
#37
The difference was that Clinton tried to work within the International Community…
MrScorpio
Mar 2013
#5
The problem with citing any instance where war is used for a particular purpose…
MrScorpio
Mar 2013
#10
"No evidence of genocide was found by the FBI and UN investigators after the war." Not true.
pampango
Mar 2013
#60
The ICTY ruled Srebrenica was genocide. The FBI investigated war crimes in Kosovo
hack89
Mar 2013
#111
It at least stood AGAINST an anti-worker regime in its fight to control Europe.
Ken Burch
Mar 2013
#14
I'm sure there are a lot of people in line for an apology for the US indifference
Arctic Dave
Mar 2013
#15
This is a good point - the USA's actions up to that point were non-aggressive
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2013
#59
Other countries do horrible things, but none claim that their nations have a special claim
Ken Burch
Mar 2013
#23
I think the war against the Japanese Empire was just, but as you have already dealt with that issue
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#30
Those are good questions, and I'll be the first to say I don't have all the answers, just opinions.
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#33
I do. I don't have to love what our leaders have done to the world to prove that.
Ken Burch
Mar 2013
#88
We have a long and bloody history of fighting against the poor, dispossessed and working people.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2013
#36
I can't think of any example of any imperial power fighting for the poor or dispossessed. In all
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#52
we were an imperial power from the beginning. first, we were part of other people's empires,
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#56
Nothing got better in Somalia. SALT didn't stop the arms race(or even come close)
Ken Burch
Mar 2013
#72
Actually, no...we didn't fight for "the dispossessed", we fought against Aidid.
Ken Burch
Mar 2013
#87
I also rewrote my OP to make it clear that I wasn't talking solely about the use of military force.
Ken Burch
Mar 2013
#90
I admire the volunteers...most of whom were radicalized and came home and spoke truth
Ken Burch
Mar 2013
#75
Yes, during Reagan's Central America interventions, returned Peace Corps volunteers
Lydia Leftcoast
Mar 2013
#82
I second this. Who in his right mind wishes he lived on the other side of the NK border?
dimbear
Mar 2013
#101