Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
6. I don't know about Mexico but Bechtel tried it in Bolivia and it didn't go over well at all
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 03:04 AM
Mar 2013

Synopsis
The fresh clean water pouring freely from your spigot, shower head and garden hose isn't just a gift of Mother Nature. It's fast becoming a profit center. Savvy businessmen have been buying up water sources across America, hoping that one day our most precious resource will become their route to riches. Already, a few multinational companies have cornered the water market in countries like France and England, reaping billions in profit.

But what are the consequences of treating life-sustaining water as just another commodity to be bought and sold to the highest bidder? To find out, NOW teamed up with the new series FRONTLINE WORLD and sent producer David Murdock and THE NEW YORKER's William Finnegan to Cochabamba, Bolivia, where a fight broke out between the citizens who depend on water and a multinational corporation that depends upon it for profit...

http://www.pbs.org/now/science/bolivia.html



Oscar Olivera, Union Activist

Cochabamba is a town of 800,000 situated high in the Andes Mountains of Bolivia. Two years ago, a popular protest there turned into a deadly riot. The army battled civilians in the streets on and off for three months, hundreds were arrested, a seventeen year-old boy was shot and killed, the government of Bolivia nearly collapsed. The issue was water.
The spark was privatization. A private consortium, dominated by the Bechtel Corporation of San Francisco, had taken over Cochabamba's water system and raised water rates. Protesters blamed Bechtel for trying to "lease the rain."

NEW YORKER writer William Finnegan traveled to Cochabamba to learn about the water war and to see what lessons could be drawn about privatization, globalization and the growing anger in Latin America over economic inequality.

Bolivia is the poorest country in South America. 70% of its people live below the poverty line. Nearly one child in ten dies before the age of five. The Bolivian economy, never strong, was wrecked by hyperinflation in the 1980s.

Desperate for relief, Bolivia has been faithfully following the dictates of the international lending community for the past fifteen years -- selling its airline, railroads, mines and electric company to private -- usually foreign-controlled -- companies. The economic shock therapy tamed inflation but led to severe recession and massive unemployment.

In the 1990s, Bolivia, under pressure from the United States, eradicated its most lucrative export - coca - the leaf that is used for cocaine.

"Drugs, illegal as they may be, they were 3% of the GDP, 18% of exports," Luis Quiroga, Bolivia's vice president during the water war, tells Finnegan. "Bad as it was, damaging as it was, if you look at it from a purely business standpoint…It [the drug trade] was Milton Friedman heaven: all privately run, no taxation, no regulation and in essence -- if you want to look at it cynically -- duty free access to markets," observes Quiroga, who is now Bolivia's president.

Politicians like Quiroga fully supported the eradication of coca, but the loss of drug money made the country even more dependent on international financial institutions like the World Bank. The Bank advised the country to continue selling its remaining assets, including water.





MY GOODMAN: But could you explain, though it’s well-known in Bolivia, hardly known here at all, though it’s a U.S. company, what happened in Cochabamba? Talk about what Bechtel tried to do and what the people responded.

OSCAR OLIVERA: [translated] It’s not that Bechtel tried to do it. They did it. They increased the charges for water, the cost of water, by 300%, so that every family had to pay, for this water service, one-fifth of their income.

AMY GOODMAN: How did they get control of the water? I mean, here, you turn on the tap. You don’t pay.

OSCAR OLIVERA: [translated] The government, under a law that was passed, conceded control of the water under a monopoly to Bechtel in a certain area. So that means that Bechtel tried to charge a fee and had the monopoly power over a very basic necessity for people. The law said even that people had to ask, had to obtain a permit to collect rainwater. That means that even rainwater was privatized. The most serious thing was that indigenous communities and farming communities, who for years had their own water rights, those water sources were converted into property that could be bought and sold by international corporations.

In confronting that situation, the people rose up, confronted Bechtel, and during five months of mobilization, managed to defeat Bechtel, breach the contract and change the law. But the most important thing — and we need to remind Evo Morales of that today — was that that victory of the people in Cochabamba was the reason why Evo Morales could be president today. If that uprising in 2000 had not ended in a popular victory, Evo Morales today would not be the president.

http://www.democracynow.org/2006/10/5/bolivian_activist_oscar_olivera_on_bechtels



We be sick puppies indeed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Post removed [View all] Post removed Mar 2013 OP
Because even the Bush family are part of "water grabbing", or "hydraulic empire". Fire Walk With Me Mar 2013 #1
I remember that ConcernedCanuk Mar 2013 #3
The Bushes bought some 100,000 acres in Paraguay... KansDem Mar 2013 #44
wait a minute, this is not some guy with a bucket next to his house CreekDog Mar 2013 #2
Its RAINWATER!! ConcernedCanuk Mar 2013 #5
well what are the fish supposed to live in? CreekDog Mar 2013 #12
A person collects water to live ConcernedCanuk Mar 2013 #16
that guy collected a huge KT2000 Mar 2013 #25
"collects water to live"... stocks it with trout, builds docks for recreational boating Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #31
This guy is a selfish destructive pig who is obstinately hurting his neighbors alcibiades_mystery Mar 2013 #59
YOu are the one that needs educating dbackjon Mar 2013 #68
If a natural resource that falls on your land isn't yours caseymoz Mar 2013 #19
what does private property care about nature? CreekDog Mar 2013 #21
Clarify maybe? caseymoz Mar 2013 #26
what you do on your property *may* harm the environment CreekDog Mar 2013 #28
A lot more.. sendero Mar 2013 #45
Or punished for making use of the sunlight that hits your property. eom Blanks Mar 2013 #47
Will we still be allowed to collect sunlight for energy needs? nt kelliekat44 Mar 2013 #49
that's next bigtree Mar 2013 #54
are the ponds natural or man made? CreekDog Mar 2013 #35
Your absolutely correct. Live your principles and reject antibiotics when infected as galileoreloaded Mar 2013 #63
No I won't. If you want to respond properly --you have to consider the context CreekDog Mar 2013 #66
Thanks Creek. Starry Messenger Mar 2013 #48
maddening! grasswire Mar 2013 #4
That one took me a moment. OnyxCollie Mar 2013 #34
I don't know about Mexico but Bechtel tried it in Bolivia and it didn't go over well at all Catherina Mar 2013 #6
been out of touch for 5 years - you are correct about Bechtel ConcernedCanuk Mar 2013 #10
+10,000 Catherina Mar 2013 #13
"we've been so thoroughly conditioned to bow down to the almighty god of profit. " ConcernedCanuk Mar 2013 #14
Oh, don't worry-- we'll *all* be outraged again once there's a Republican president. /nt Marr Mar 2013 #18
It is a horried state of reality. Knightraven Mar 2013 #7
What this guy was doing was damming in a watershed JCMach1 Mar 2013 #8
Read the other links ConcernedCanuk Mar 2013 #11
If you wanted to make a serious point dbackjon Mar 2013 #70
Depending on his set-up, it might be a violation of health regulations. wickerwoman Mar 2013 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Mar 2013 #15
Actually, it's still illegal. Robb Mar 2013 #64
Can you sue the owner of the rainwater Downwinder Mar 2013 #17
Well, - that'd be God or whatever spirits one believes in ConcernedCanuk Mar 2013 #20
Excellent question. davidthegnome Mar 2013 #24
I was just wondering. Downwinder Mar 2013 #27
Hmm.. goes against what many architects are practicing these days. crazy homeless guy Mar 2013 #22
i have a couple of issues with this OP, and no, I'm not corporate CreekDog Mar 2013 #23
It's no coincidence that it's all right wing sources for the Gary Harrington bargle Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #30
Heres a question davidthegnome Mar 2013 #29
how can we have any useful discussion if people won't argue rationally here? CreekDog Mar 2013 #32
If we don't allow companies the freedom to emit toxic fumes, next we'll outlaw FARTING! Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #33
You do realize I was joking, right? davidthegnome Mar 2013 #37
then the government can't regulate to protect the environment CreekDog Mar 2013 #40
Not my point at all. davidthegnome Mar 2013 #55
Reductio ad absurdum demwing Mar 2013 #57
I didn't say that. I said if it can't be regulated by the government, the environment can't... CreekDog Mar 2013 #65
What? That's like saying when you stub your toe all toes now need to be Javaman Mar 2013 #72
Wow. In my town, which is NW Indiana, there are rain barrels at the town hall with brochures and kas125 Mar 2013 #36
Yikes! When I was a kid, I used to collect rain water for my pet frogs... Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 #38
I've researched sustainable, off-the-grid living justiceischeap Mar 2013 #39
Chevron and Wal Mart want to be able to do whatever they want CreekDog Mar 2013 #41
I'm the last to say we need to stop environmental laws justiceischeap Mar 2013 #43
Pretty soon, Americans might start getting charged just for breathing. Jamaal510 Mar 2013 #42
I didn't follow all the links but I did read some madokie Mar 2013 #46
For some reason, this 3-year-old story gets reposted every few months Recursion Mar 2013 #50
+1 Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #61
This. Earth_First Mar 2013 #71
Ahhhhh, naturalnews... Scootaloo Mar 2013 #51
This thread is bullshit - the guy diverted water when he had no legal rights to do so hatrack Mar 2013 #52
Well as long as I can keep my 2 empty big tubs for rain water next to my home veggie garden. southernyankeebelle Mar 2013 #53
We had multiple threads on his case last summer. Here's one: struggle4progress Mar 2013 #56
Funny how many DUers missed the point then, too... Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #62
Google the rainfall in that area DiverDave Mar 2013 #58
No, it doesn't rain all the time there - December's wettest at 3.5", but summer rainfall is minimal hatrack Mar 2013 #69
A little of Topic but 4Q2u2 Mar 2013 #60
Naturalnews... SidDithers Mar 2013 #67
Huh? So my bird baths and wheel barrow are illegal? How about the garden? talkingmime Mar 2013 #73
I recced this OP. Now I wish I could unrec it. It's bullshit. Peace Patriot Mar 2013 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed»Reply #6