Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: One study explains why it’s tough to pass liberal laws [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)40. There is pushback - mainly by Democrats to keep the funding in place.
Because in the long term, it's better to have a healthy society.
As far as not teaching children to share, I understand what you're saying - but education in private facilities create more problems through social division and isolation. They don't have the sharing public schools have taught. They are focused on only their class, their group, their religion. Others are not really people to them.
This was the great success of FAPE, the combination of economic, racial and social groups, all learning how to interact with each other and promote social mobility and expansion of ways to make it in the world. It prepares people for a global society, which many are already working in now.
In my area, they have taught a great deal of not just sharing, but problem solving from that age on, to prevent conflicts. Also how to use emotional intelligence to be able to react to change and problems with integrity. We also have courses on media literacy to help comprehend the psychological means of advertising and propaganda.
What I'd like to see is more economic teaching, about how the different classes or groups in society work together. What one needs to do if they don't fit the college mold and how to make use of their talents to succeed in life. An honest appraisal of how this country is organized. There are public schools teaching Howard Zinn's 'A People's History of the United States' to their students as part of their course material.
It won't happen in conservatively controlled districts. People who want to change this country will have to get involved and not cede ground to the conservatives who have taken over school systems in red states, and every other office, including the ones that people don't know very well. I find that they have done great ground work, use their energy to make those meetings every week to build coaltions.
Yet I find more people willing to blame what is going in D.C with Democrats or Obama for what he can't change at the local level. People seem to have less interest in these tedious positions not in the national news. We need to get down to the ground on this and keep at it. The conservatives have been at it for over 40 years, we must do it or just accept fascism.
Don't give up, although I can understand if you are older and can't get involved.
As far as not teaching children to share, I understand what you're saying - but education in private facilities create more problems through social division and isolation. They don't have the sharing public schools have taught. They are focused on only their class, their group, their religion. Others are not really people to them.
This was the great success of FAPE, the combination of economic, racial and social groups, all learning how to interact with each other and promote social mobility and expansion of ways to make it in the world. It prepares people for a global society, which many are already working in now.
In my area, they have taught a great deal of not just sharing, but problem solving from that age on, to prevent conflicts. Also how to use emotional intelligence to be able to react to change and problems with integrity. We also have courses on media literacy to help comprehend the psychological means of advertising and propaganda.
What I'd like to see is more economic teaching, about how the different classes or groups in society work together. What one needs to do if they don't fit the college mold and how to make use of their talents to succeed in life. An honest appraisal of how this country is organized. There are public schools teaching Howard Zinn's 'A People's History of the United States' to their students as part of their course material.
It won't happen in conservatively controlled districts. People who want to change this country will have to get involved and not cede ground to the conservatives who have taken over school systems in red states, and every other office, including the ones that people don't know very well. I find that they have done great ground work, use their energy to make those meetings every week to build coaltions.
Yet I find more people willing to blame what is going in D.C with Democrats or Obama for what he can't change at the local level. People seem to have less interest in these tedious positions not in the national news. We need to get down to the ground on this and keep at it. The conservatives have been at it for over 40 years, we must do it or just accept fascism.
Don't give up, although I can understand if you are older and can't get involved.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When you get really local as in school board and mayor and such they don't use partisan labels.
Bandit
Mar 2013
#16
Apparently it only takes a day or two in the DC echo chamber to reverse a lifetime of knowledge.
Scuba
Mar 2013
#3
I've found that the advocates of privatization schemes are the most vocal locally. They show up at
freshwest
Mar 2013
#28
Yep. They began taking over local public school boards this way about 25 years ago, by my
Dark n Stormy Knight
Mar 2013
#36
Not only with schools, but that's big one. Bush's faith-based initatives destroyed public oversight
freshwest
Mar 2013
#38
How depressing. It's greed, something we supposedly as a society, reject. But anyone who is wealthy
Dark n Stormy Knight
Mar 2013
#39
Nothing, that was a disclaimer, some people here don't get involved. It takes time, money, mobility.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#50
Just as I thought. I was just curious if I was sounding feeble-minded or had said something
Dark n Stormy Knight
Mar 2013
#52
We must also take a strong look at everyone's financial interests to create what's good for all.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#53
LIberty and just ice for all. What's not to like? I'm pretty sure that the vast majority of
Dark n Stormy Knight
Mar 2013
#54
Rural America has more power than their numbers say they should, its that simple
uponit7771
Mar 2013
#4
Nice to see that liberal politicians are closer to accurately assessing what voters really believe,
pampango
Mar 2013
#5
Well, it used to. Now the corporation keeps all the money instead of doing maintenance, and
jtuck004
Mar 2013
#45
This is not exclusively true, but here's how the game is played based on my experience
Major Nikon
Mar 2013
#18
Yeah? Well things are so crazy on the Republican side that I half expect one to ban bikinis.
Spitfire of ATJ
Mar 2013
#23
it's hard to pass liberal laws because big money controls politics and media. duh.
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#21
Add another line of how the media tells politicians where their district stands.
Spitfire of ATJ
Mar 2013
#22
"History has tried to teach us that we can't have good government under politicians.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2013
#26
The RW has a political party that supports them. The liberal/left has a political party that...
Eleanors38
Mar 2013
#29
It makes it hard for modern liberals. The right can only care about money and the base loves it.
raouldukelives
Mar 2013
#41
And a poll of people showed that everyone favored progressive policies when labels were removed.
Thor_MN
Mar 2013
#32
Democrats are not nearly as proactive in such matters. I was about to say that to "distribute
Dark n Stormy Knight
Mar 2013
#37
This very article shows part of the problem: OBAMACARE IS NOT 'UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE'
Mutatis Mutandis
Mar 2013
#42