Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]
This message was self-deleted by its author (paulbibeau) on Tue Dec 15, 2015, 06:52 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
166 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Declaring war should be under the authority of Congress not the executive branch
still_one
Mar 2013
#1
He's not arguing against using drones on American soil, he wants clarity as to when.
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#3
People want jobs, healthcare, education, better wages. This drone talk is becoming just paranoia.
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#17
We need more oversight and restraint... not a letter telling us what he's going to do.
paulbibeau
Mar 2013
#23
Hey I'm all for oversight/restraint but republicans created this mess. Now they're pointing fingers?
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#26
I'm the one saying the Left is anti-drone, you're claiming I don't speak for the Left.
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#101
I don't even know what the argument is about. I agree we need oversight & restraint, I just don't
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#108
When did I claim such a thing ever? I said The Left is anti-drone. You told me I don't speak for
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#111
Then obviously it needs to be said 50001 times... because nothing has changed.
paulbibeau
Mar 2013
#6
I'm not saying he did more for freedom over the course of a long period of time...
paulbibeau
Mar 2013
#98
I venture to say that the issue of drones is being dealt with legally just as any other issue
lumpy
Mar 2013
#64
How does our membership in the UN affect our foreign policy ? Does this have any
lumpy
Mar 2013
#136
It's an embarrassment that more Dems aren't taking a stronger stand against drones.
reformist2
Mar 2013
#27
The real embarassment, speaking about weapons, is that the Republicans and their offshoots
lumpy
Mar 2013
#67
The issue isn't going away. There is always the issue of the GOP trying to get control
lumpy
Mar 2013
#71
No, he's not. We're not killing people with drones here. The President didn't
TwilightGardener
Mar 2013
#56
David Duke likes ALL the same thing Rand Paul does. David Duke hates all the same people Rand does.
graham4anything
Mar 2013
#59
The definition of an "uncomfortable truth". And it's much too uncomfortable for most DUers. (nt)
Nye Bevan
Mar 2013
#84
So he's a cretin for opposing Bush policies? Then what does that make all of us
sabrina 1
Mar 2013
#128
Like I said, if getting Paul to support an issue that has long been supported by
sabrina 1
Mar 2013
#159
Or perhaps "the usual suspects" believe that Rand Paul is far more dangerous to
Chorophyll
Mar 2013
#130
Yup that's me, a "usual suspect." I've never seen you before, but I guess you've been
Chorophyll
Mar 2013
#138
So true, their ad-hom attacks overwhelm their ability to think about the issue
just1voice
Mar 2013
#147
Yes, a ploy. And it has worked. Now Liberals have abandoned Civil Rights because of
sabrina 1
Mar 2013
#142
Paul is being an IDIOT. "Promise you won't attack a person in a cafe with a drone." FUCKING CRAZY !
RBInMaine
Mar 2013
#144
Your entire post is VERY well said. Rand Paul is being NUTTY, and the whole issue is being HYPED.
RBInMaine
Mar 2013
#163
So you made a thread telling us the broken clock was right a couple of times today?
donheld
Mar 2013
#146