Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)If I Had a Rocket Launcher... [View all]
I want a AH-64 Apache attack helicopter. I am assured that it is the best attack helicopter in the world and if it's not, it's close enough. It can fly 184 miles per hour. It can go 323 miles on a tank of gas. It has a 30mm automatic cannon that can fire 1200 rounds, and it can carry 16 antitank Hellfire missiles. It can also carry 76 unguided 2.75 inch rockets. With this helicopter, I could theoretically destroy 80% of a standard Russian tank battalion in a single sortie. I am firmly convinced that possession of this helicopter will prevent me from ever having to worry about a situation where law and order breaks down because the police cant travel, theres no communication. And there are armed gangs roaming around neighborhoods. In fact, the mere possibility of such a breakdown in civilization means that I have an inalterable and inalienable right to this helicopter, because there is nothing so poorly regulated as an armed gang.
At first, I thought that a semiautomatic AR-15 rifle or a double-barrel shotgun would be sufficient, especially if equipped with the correct accoutrements. But the more I dwell on Lindsey Graham's dystopian talking points, the more I feel compelled to be on the safe side.
I'm going with the AH-64 Apache attack helicopter. Just try and stop me.
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2013/3/6/214755/0042
At first, I thought that a semiautomatic AR-15 rifle or a double-barrel shotgun would be sufficient, especially if equipped with the correct accoutrements. But the more I dwell on Lindsey Graham's dystopian talking points, the more I feel compelled to be on the safe side.
I'm going with the AH-64 Apache attack helicopter. Just try and stop me.
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2013/3/6/214755/0042
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you can pass the background checks for the guns and missiles, and can afford them...
slackmaster
Mar 2013
#1
Take it up with the Supreme Court; that's how the law has been decided for 80 years
Recursion
Mar 2013
#41
But...but...SCOTUS is the government. I have guns to protect myself from the government.
wtmusic
Mar 2013
#48
With appropriate licenses, yes. But the fact they need a license means it isn't a right. (nt)
jeff47
Mar 2013
#74
The Supreme Court has ruled many times that marriage is a fundamental right.
slackmaster
Mar 2013
#88
They're destructive devices under the law. It is at least theoretically possible to buy them...
slackmaster
Mar 2013
#54
You can't be arbitrarily denied an explosives permit for a capricious reason.
slackmaster
Mar 2013
#76
That's exactly what I am saying. All rights exist save those that have been curtailed through...
slackmaster
Mar 2013
#83
I think I've lost the thread here. Besides marriage, which you are wrong about, what are you saying
slackmaster
Mar 2013
#90
"You have a right to own it" - A military attack helicopter? No, you don't. Is there any limit
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#60