Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

meow2u3

(25,250 posts)
8. This is probably why the teabaggers are grandstanding about domestic drones
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 02:12 PM
Mar 2013

The teabaggers identify with these "patriot" groups and don't want Obama to fight back if they do start a civil war.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

My understanding is they have targeted Al Queda and the Taliban with the law... Kalidurga Mar 2013 #1
Considering what they did to the righteous, peaceful, 1st Amendment Occupy movement: Fire Walk With Me Mar 2013 #2
my thoughts exactly FirstLight Mar 2013 #13
The federal government didn't do SHIT to OWS. Comrade_McKenzie Mar 2013 #14
um, yeah right, total coincidence that occupations were cleared out almost simultaneously Warren Stupidity Mar 2013 #18
Was that the federal government? Were there armed drones? MineralMan Mar 2013 #36
You think we're droping bombs on people in the middle of our cities SpartanDem Mar 2013 #37
Please see First Light's post above yours. Fire Walk With Me Mar 2013 #38
If Clinton saw McVeigh coming, and law enforcement wasn't able to TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #3
I believe you are correct Still Sensible Mar 2013 #4
Defining 'imminent threat' is useless. There will always be unforeseen circumstances. randome Mar 2013 #7
The Obama administration didn't get bogged down with "imminent." Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #11
If we brought in 535 politicians, I have no doubt it would get bogged down. randome Mar 2013 #12
There Is No Real Question About This, Sir: The Military Can Suppress Insurrection The Magistrate Mar 2013 #5
The "big battle" is just a carrot siligut Mar 2013 #6
This is probably why the teabaggers are grandstanding about domestic drones meow2u3 Mar 2013 #8
It's their form of patriotism. Confederate flag thrown in for free. freshwest Mar 2013 #41
What if the patriot's kid is eating pizza at a cafe? Can we drone his ass, too? Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #9
That would depend entirely on the kind of pizza the kid is eating Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #31
Take Waco, and raise it to the BENGHAZI! power ... zbdent Mar 2013 #10
In answer to your question, no. Your OP is a straw man. cthulu2016 Mar 2013 #15
No strawman. The AG was asked if the President could attack citizens on US soil SpartanDem Mar 2013 #23
Don't use logic in front of these hyperbolic ideologues. Comrade_McKenzie Mar 2013 #16
if they arrayed themselves for battle and engaged the government in war? Warren Stupidity Mar 2013 #17
Imagine yourself in the Army and you are ordered to upaloopa Mar 2013 #19
It all depends on what you think "imminent" means. kudzu22 Mar 2013 #20
My point was these powers had been use in times of bordering on revolt SpartanDem Mar 2013 #24
I expect the President to act as needed to preserve the Union. bluedigger Mar 2013 #21
Agree. randome Mar 2013 #22
The argument isn't about suppressing an active insurrection. Xithras Mar 2013 #25
Yours is not a valid scenario. randome Mar 2013 #28
That is exactly the point. Xithras Mar 2013 #30
If you substitute 'military force' for 'drone' in your post, I agree with you. randome Mar 2013 #32
In that situation? Yes. Xithras Mar 2013 #33
I don't think the President claimed that power on U.S soil SpartanDem Mar 2013 #29
No, that's your argument. Not "the" argument. jeff47 Mar 2013 #34
Forgive my ignorance here. Mz Pip Mar 2013 #26
Foolish waste of time to call DOD One_Life_To_Give Mar 2013 #27
The level would have to be high to warrant such action. A foreign military action on our soil yes. LiberalFighter Mar 2013 #35
Dudes, what was the Civil War? The miltary fighting traitorous Americans on US soil. McCamy Taylor Mar 2013 #39
John Brown, pre posse comitatus nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #40
posse comitatus isn't ironcald SpartanDem Mar 2013 #44
As you posted, you'd need a full fledge revolt nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #46
You mean like Kent State ? RagAss Mar 2013 #42
I believe that was national guard troops or the police ThomThom Mar 2013 #48
How the U.S. Military Would Crush a Tea Party Rebellion arely staircase Mar 2013 #43
What's wrong with using normal police? JVS Mar 2013 #45
It was illegal until Bush got the law removed. ThomThom Mar 2013 #47
"One of these patriot groups"... How many people is that? cherokeeprogressive Mar 2013 #49
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do people think President...»Reply #8