Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
43. How the U.S. Military Would Crush a Tea Party Rebellion
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 10:58 PM
Mar 2013

A right-wing militia inspired by the Tea Party movement has taken over the city of Darlington, South Carolina, arrested the local government, and declared that the federal government should be overthrown. As the militia establishes checkpoints across I-95, other extremist groups across the nation rush to declare their support. South Carolina’s governor – a Tea Party supporter – declines to send in law enforcement to quash the militia, but quietly asks for federal intervention. The President invokes the Insurrection Act to authorize the use of federal troops, as the Pentagon prepares for war at home….

.....

Make no mistake, this isn’t the Pentagon providing military support to hurricane victims, or even sending troops to support local authorities as during the 1992 Los Angeles riots. This is a war. There will be casualties. Refugees from the fighting must be housed and fed. But it’s a strange kind of war. Thus U.S. forces begin, as any combat forces would, by attempting to collect intelligence on enemy forces – but then have to erase the intel within 90 days after operations are completed, in order not to run afoul of federal privacy laws. They will be eavesdropping on “enemy” communications, but only with a court order. They must depend on local law enforcement for information on the rebels, but the local cops may be rebel sympathizers. There will be “information/influence operations designed to present a picture of the federal response and the inevitable defeat of the insurrection.”

Curiously, the authors don’t really delve the fundamental issue of American soldiers firing on American civilians, except to note that troops would have to comply with standing rules on force, which require graduated levels of violence. Civil support in South Carolina makes counterinsurgency in Kabul look like a picnic.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelpeck/2012/11/15/how-the-u-s-military-would-crush-a-tea-party-rebellion/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

My understanding is they have targeted Al Queda and the Taliban with the law... Kalidurga Mar 2013 #1
Considering what they did to the righteous, peaceful, 1st Amendment Occupy movement: Fire Walk With Me Mar 2013 #2
my thoughts exactly FirstLight Mar 2013 #13
The federal government didn't do SHIT to OWS. Comrade_McKenzie Mar 2013 #14
um, yeah right, total coincidence that occupations were cleared out almost simultaneously Warren Stupidity Mar 2013 #18
Was that the federal government? Were there armed drones? MineralMan Mar 2013 #36
You think we're droping bombs on people in the middle of our cities SpartanDem Mar 2013 #37
Please see First Light's post above yours. Fire Walk With Me Mar 2013 #38
If Clinton saw McVeigh coming, and law enforcement wasn't able to TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #3
I believe you are correct Still Sensible Mar 2013 #4
Defining 'imminent threat' is useless. There will always be unforeseen circumstances. randome Mar 2013 #7
The Obama administration didn't get bogged down with "imminent." Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #11
If we brought in 535 politicians, I have no doubt it would get bogged down. randome Mar 2013 #12
There Is No Real Question About This, Sir: The Military Can Suppress Insurrection The Magistrate Mar 2013 #5
The "big battle" is just a carrot siligut Mar 2013 #6
This is probably why the teabaggers are grandstanding about domestic drones meow2u3 Mar 2013 #8
It's their form of patriotism. Confederate flag thrown in for free. freshwest Mar 2013 #41
What if the patriot's kid is eating pizza at a cafe? Can we drone his ass, too? Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #9
That would depend entirely on the kind of pizza the kid is eating Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #31
Take Waco, and raise it to the BENGHAZI! power ... zbdent Mar 2013 #10
In answer to your question, no. Your OP is a straw man. cthulu2016 Mar 2013 #15
No strawman. The AG was asked if the President could attack citizens on US soil SpartanDem Mar 2013 #23
Don't use logic in front of these hyperbolic ideologues. Comrade_McKenzie Mar 2013 #16
if they arrayed themselves for battle and engaged the government in war? Warren Stupidity Mar 2013 #17
Imagine yourself in the Army and you are ordered to upaloopa Mar 2013 #19
It all depends on what you think "imminent" means. kudzu22 Mar 2013 #20
My point was these powers had been use in times of bordering on revolt SpartanDem Mar 2013 #24
I expect the President to act as needed to preserve the Union. bluedigger Mar 2013 #21
Agree. randome Mar 2013 #22
The argument isn't about suppressing an active insurrection. Xithras Mar 2013 #25
Yours is not a valid scenario. randome Mar 2013 #28
That is exactly the point. Xithras Mar 2013 #30
If you substitute 'military force' for 'drone' in your post, I agree with you. randome Mar 2013 #32
In that situation? Yes. Xithras Mar 2013 #33
I don't think the President claimed that power on U.S soil SpartanDem Mar 2013 #29
No, that's your argument. Not "the" argument. jeff47 Mar 2013 #34
Forgive my ignorance here. Mz Pip Mar 2013 #26
Foolish waste of time to call DOD One_Life_To_Give Mar 2013 #27
The level would have to be high to warrant such action. A foreign military action on our soil yes. LiberalFighter Mar 2013 #35
Dudes, what was the Civil War? The miltary fighting traitorous Americans on US soil. McCamy Taylor Mar 2013 #39
John Brown, pre posse comitatus nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #40
posse comitatus isn't ironcald SpartanDem Mar 2013 #44
As you posted, you'd need a full fledge revolt nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #46
You mean like Kent State ? RagAss Mar 2013 #42
I believe that was national guard troops or the police ThomThom Mar 2013 #48
How the U.S. Military Would Crush a Tea Party Rebellion arely staircase Mar 2013 #43
What's wrong with using normal police? JVS Mar 2013 #45
It was illegal until Bush got the law removed. ThomThom Mar 2013 #47
"One of these patriot groups"... How many people is that? cherokeeprogressive Mar 2013 #49
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do people think President...»Reply #43