General Discussion

BO 08

(53 posts)

14. Question

Fri Mar 8, 2013, 01:52 AM

Mar 2013

Do you agree that Drones used to attack terrorists in uncooperative territories ushers in the most dramatic DE-escalation of war in human history?

Do you think Paul does?

How many civilians would be killed if we carpet bombed Cambo... Pakistan?

How many troops would be killed if we invaded the Yemen?

I'm surprised to the point of signing up an account to see so many liberals arguing on behalf of bloated, tragic military incursions.

And many pretend that, if not for the drones, the enemy would be safe to roam among the innocents rather than the wholesale slaughter previous administrations have chosen.

Obama seems to be earning his peace prize if you ask me.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I guess it's time to throw msnbc under the bus [View all] nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 OP

Dead to me. All of 'em. MannyGoldstein Mar 2013 #1

I know, I know... nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #3

What if it's agreeing on the importance of cutting the deficit? JVS Mar 2013 #58

I only watch Ed and Rachel still. Cleita Mar 2013 #2

Nice to see that there's still intelligence and wisdom at MSNBC. MadHound Mar 2013 #4

I only watch Al Sharpton. graham4anything Mar 2013 #5

I LOVE Al, him and Ed are my favorites that I never miss. The rest I can take or Raine Mar 2013 #16

I love Reverend Al JustAnotherGen Mar 2013 #26

Likewise....... MzShellG Mar 2013 #53

Is MSNBC now the latest poutrage on DU? I can't go over to Meta to find madinmaryland Mar 2013 #6

The latest is liberals actually agreeing with Rand Paul nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #8

Question BO 08 Mar 2013 #14

You're not thinking very clearly, nor very far ahead. MadHound Mar 2013 #17

Every day 35 people die from bullets/guns. Constant. No change in that...yet graham4anything Mar 2013 #19

What does that have to do with Obama's drone policy? MadHound Mar 2013 #20

You're strictly OwnedByCats Mar 2013 #59

How many future terrorists are being created? nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #25

many times less BO 08 Mar 2013 #39

I suspect you have no clue what blowback means. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #54

I suspect you are wrong BO 08 Mar 2013 #60

Whatever...I still remember after 911 nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #62

It appears OwnedByCats Mar 2013 #61

It's the hubris of Empire nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #63

Well, if that is the case, then other countries have the same right, no? sabrina 1 Mar 2013 #28

yes they do BO 08 Mar 2013 #38

Well, I haven't noticed any of them using them at all so far. sabrina 1 Mar 2013 #40

doesn't appear to you. BO 08 Mar 2013 #41

Because it's a means of projecting force without stirring up much political backlash back home. Marr Mar 2013 #49

I'll stick with Stephanie Miller. nt Comrade_McKenzie Mar 2013 #7

What Paul did was nothing but a publicity stunt, he is not a true believer. krawhitham Mar 2013 #9

Yup, and...his father nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #10

ProSense makes my point better than I did krawhitham Mar 2013 #18

Of course, party before country nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #21

Actually, ProSense Mar 2013 #29

Do me a favor and send this to Rachel Maddow nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #32

Exactly. Well said. This filibuster accomplished nothing besides attention for Rand Paul. stevenleser Mar 2013 #33

+1 n/t zappaman Mar 2013 #46

Brennan is a torturer and I think he should not have been nominated The Second Stone Mar 2013 #11

Where Venn diagrams are useful nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #12

Noooooo. Only thing close to sanity remaining on cable. Zax2me Mar 2013 #13

Agreed, but she agreed that Rand Paul did something good nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #23

So true! zappaman Mar 2013 #15

Two people from opposing parties can think Mar 2013 #27

Odd that the self-proclaimed "moderates" suddenly can't understand that. Marr Mar 2013 #50

Indeed think Mar 2013 #52

Odd how the proportions are always the same & no one ever says anything about the NON-overlaps. patrice Mar 2013 #43

Right. No differences whatsoever! zappaman Mar 2013 #47

What are you saying? Marr Mar 2013 #51

Yeah, Well. Thank God We're So Awash In Liberal Media Sources These Days..... Paladin Mar 2013 #22

I am not...it is the logic a few here are using nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #24

From OP post: "(Major sarcasm notice) " think Mar 2013 #30

Hi back at you nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #31

Perhaps think Mar 2013 #42

I think you illustrated the point perfectly Puzzledtraveller Mar 2013 #48

Ed & Tweety have have already declared whose running fadedrose Mar 2013 #34

MSNBC & Rand Paul fadedrose Mar 2013 #35

That might be part of it nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #36

The Rand Paul segments on both Lawrence's & Ed's shows were excellent, Nadin! pacalo Mar 2013 #37

Rand Paul segments liberal from boston Mar 2013 #44

What Lindsay Graham said was very unexpected! pacalo Mar 2013 #55

I happened to watch 'em nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #56

Thanks, Nadin... pacalo Mar 2013 #57

Paul's stunt was like a tweet from Ashton Kutcher Politicub Mar 2013 #45