Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]paulbibeau
(743 posts)148. Yes. Thank you.
It's also the right thing to do!
The people freaking out seem to be willfully ignoring this, which is bizarre.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
166 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Declaring war should be under the authority of Congress not the executive branch
still_one
Mar 2013
#1
He's not arguing against using drones on American soil, he wants clarity as to when.
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#3
People want jobs, healthcare, education, better wages. This drone talk is becoming just paranoia.
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#17
We need more oversight and restraint... not a letter telling us what he's going to do.
paulbibeau
Mar 2013
#23
Hey I'm all for oversight/restraint but republicans created this mess. Now they're pointing fingers?
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#26
I'm the one saying the Left is anti-drone, you're claiming I don't speak for the Left.
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#101
I don't even know what the argument is about. I agree we need oversight & restraint, I just don't
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#108
When did I claim such a thing ever? I said The Left is anti-drone. You told me I don't speak for
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#111
Then obviously it needs to be said 50001 times... because nothing has changed.
paulbibeau
Mar 2013
#6
I'm not saying he did more for freedom over the course of a long period of time...
paulbibeau
Mar 2013
#98
I venture to say that the issue of drones is being dealt with legally just as any other issue
lumpy
Mar 2013
#64
How does our membership in the UN affect our foreign policy ? Does this have any
lumpy
Mar 2013
#136
It's an embarrassment that more Dems aren't taking a stronger stand against drones.
reformist2
Mar 2013
#27
The real embarassment, speaking about weapons, is that the Republicans and their offshoots
lumpy
Mar 2013
#67
The issue isn't going away. There is always the issue of the GOP trying to get control
lumpy
Mar 2013
#71
No, he's not. We're not killing people with drones here. The President didn't
TwilightGardener
Mar 2013
#56
David Duke likes ALL the same thing Rand Paul does. David Duke hates all the same people Rand does.
graham4anything
Mar 2013
#59
The definition of an "uncomfortable truth". And it's much too uncomfortable for most DUers. (nt)
Nye Bevan
Mar 2013
#84
So he's a cretin for opposing Bush policies? Then what does that make all of us
sabrina 1
Mar 2013
#128
Like I said, if getting Paul to support an issue that has long been supported by
sabrina 1
Mar 2013
#159
Or perhaps "the usual suspects" believe that Rand Paul is far more dangerous to
Chorophyll
Mar 2013
#130
Yup that's me, a "usual suspect." I've never seen you before, but I guess you've been
Chorophyll
Mar 2013
#138
So true, their ad-hom attacks overwhelm their ability to think about the issue
just1voice
Mar 2013
#147
Yes, a ploy. And it has worked. Now Liberals have abandoned Civil Rights because of
sabrina 1
Mar 2013
#142
Paul is being an IDIOT. "Promise you won't attack a person in a cafe with a drone." FUCKING CRAZY !
RBInMaine
Mar 2013
#144
Your entire post is VERY well said. Rand Paul is being NUTTY, and the whole issue is being HYPED.
RBInMaine
Mar 2013
#163
So you made a thread telling us the broken clock was right a couple of times today?
donheld
Mar 2013
#146