General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A nightmare that doctors overwhelmingly choose to avoid when they die themselves [View all]HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)state'. It doesn't say anything like that so far as I can tell from the abstract.
The paper cited for the CPR claim is this one (none of the others have anything to do with CPR survival rates):
Prehospital epinephrine use and survival among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22436956
It's a study done in Japan comparing use of ephinephrine v. no epinephrine in "out of hospital" cardiac arrest treated by EMTs.
I can't even figure out where the numbers in the graphic come from. It claims the study was of 95,072 subjects with 3% surviving with a good outcome and 3% surviving 'in a vegetative state'.
But the total number of subjects was 417,159 of which 402158 were in the 'no epinephrine' group.
The only thing close to the "3.0%" is the finding that in the no epinephrine group, 3.1% survived with "good or moderate cerebral performance" (Cerebral Performance Score of 1 or 2) and 3.1% survived with "no, mild, or moderate neurological disability" (Overall Performance Score of 1 or 2).
Neither of these categories equals "vegetative state".
So this claim just seems false.
I agree, though -- seems like a lot of supposed democrats are on board with the right wing agenda. Or maybe it's just the 'big money' agenda.