Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)

6. Hey, Bob, let's go dove hunting...

Reply to Tommy_Carcetti (Reply #4)

Fri Mar 8, 2013, 12:41 PM

Mar 2013

Sorry Jim, I can't buy a shotgun.

Why's that, Bob?
_____
I'll let you finish the script. But the 5th Amendment problem still stands.

Sounds like GA is trying to act where it legally can by checking involuntary records.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gee, I can't see anything bad ever coming from this. At all. [View all] Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2013 OP

Looks like checking records of any INVOLUNTARY treatment Eleanors38 Mar 2013 #1

If we were talking about the right to vote, sure. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2013 #2

Seems like a 5 yr. back search is a better way to go, Eleanors38 Mar 2013 #5

This would be the part I would support. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #12

There is the problem with stigmatization. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #3

It's not a list being freely disseminated to the general public. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2013 #4

Hey, Bob, let's go dove hunting... Eleanors38 Mar 2013 #6

I'm glad I waited to see how this thread went. Good point. randome Mar 2013 #8

Thanks. Upstream, the more salient point was implied: Eleanors38 Mar 2013 #9

Especially since as you posted above, getting listed could cost you more than your guns. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #11

Touche! n/t backscatter712 Mar 2013 #10

Nope. Not at all. Seems like a good idea. talkingmime Mar 2013 #7