Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
207. It meant that in a case where they already *had* an irreversible brain injury, they wouldn't
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 05:27 PM
Mar 2013

want chemo.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rec except the "hugely profitable for hospitals" part. It isn't. Scuba Mar 2013 #1
How so? UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #3
Somebody is making a pile of money from this, otherwise they wouldn't keep the hospitals open.... OldDem2012 Mar 2013 #4
No, it depends on the type of hospital OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #61
There's bigger profits in other areas. Pharmaceuticals have the highest profit margins in medicine. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #80
That may be true but doesn't disprove that hospitals peform OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #113
I'm sure they do. But they perform unneeded procedures and profit off pointless care during HiPointDem Mar 2013 #114
We had this same discussion several months ago. OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #118
I just posted some data and it included links. Here's another: HiPointDem Mar 2013 #121
Oh yes, I don't know what I am talking about. But you do. OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #123
Most people over 65 don't spend *any* time in ICU in the year they die. No, you don't know HiPointDem Mar 2013 #127
You posted one link--just one--and I read it. The whole thing. OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #131
... HiPointDem Mar 2013 #137
Don't bother, HiPointDem. kurtzapril4 Mar 2013 #218
Show me where I posted OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #230
LOVE how you add links later and pretend they were there all the time. OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #231
love how you just make stuff up. 1st edit, with links, was less than 1 minute after the original HiPointDem Mar 2013 #233
When I finish my post has nothing to do with when I read yours. OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #234
Are You Sure RobinA Mar 2013 #151
Ah yes. Blanks Mar 2013 #191
Exactly right! n/t kurtzapril4 Mar 2013 #219
Sure, families do it too. OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #228
Some people totally insist of this level of "care" lark Mar 2013 #175
Why did they chose hospice when they Smilo Mar 2013 #197
This is probably a morbid question so you don't have to answer. OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #229
They believe God values life above everything lark Mar 2013 #244
problem is "life saving" not "pointless" was the adjective used to describe the surgery that arely staircase Mar 2013 #129
The question in the graphic was "If you had irreversible brain damage, would you want X" HiPointDem Mar 2013 #140
And that is exactly what the graphic I posted was getting at. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #145
you misunderstood the question; it is "you already *have* irreversible brain injury, do you want HiPointDem Mar 2013 #147
No to that as well. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #148
no. i don't believe most people would want it, either. which is why i question the radio show's HiPointDem Mar 2013 #152
Are you worried about CPR being banned? UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #153
i am worried about choice of care being taken from older people, yes. and that would not HiPointDem Mar 2013 #156
Ah, kind of like death panels. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #162
i see my original assessment of your character was correct. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #198
Guess you didn't read the Time report last week. sinkingfeeling Mar 2013 #157
Just finishing that myself, and it's an eye-opener Lifelong Protester Mar 2013 #183
Yeah I did, so? OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #227
It's hugely profitable downstream adieu Mar 2013 #169
True. Hugely profitable for businesses DEPENDENT on hospitals. /nt TheMadMonk Mar 2013 #5
That part's definitely true. Scuba Mar 2013 #6
Exactly.. sendero Mar 2013 #26
I think of hospitals as being similar to the military buying hammers at $50 each n/t arcane1 Mar 2013 #37
ok, no argument there arely staircase Mar 2013 #42
In fact it serves best when they "lose" a little bit of money. TheMadMonk Mar 2013 #57
Have you seen the recent TIME cover story on the cost of care in the USA? Flatulo Mar 2013 #135
I will read it.. sendero Mar 2013 #141
"merely the collectors for drug, device and equipment makers who make the real money" HiPointDem Mar 2013 #142
In the TIME article, they make a similar point. Flatulo Mar 2013 #165
Beat Me To It RobinA Mar 2013 #149
Amazing how much misinformation there is on this topic. Many DU'ers believe hospitals are reaping.. Scuba Mar 2013 #154
I wonder how my aunt feels now hfojvt Mar 2013 #194
Let's call what it should be: the right to choose to die under palliative care. Auggie Mar 2013 #2
Doctors don't have to worry about it, they've got the drugs to end it peacefully. xtraxritical Mar 2013 #58
which people already have. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #85
Right. Except we must CONTROLLL TEH DRUGGGGS Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #87
It's getting very difficult to even find a primary care doctor who will prescribe pain meds. Flatulo Mar 2013 #138
Good gosh. I'm sorry that happened to you. nt raccoon Mar 2013 #176
Amen. n/t easttexaslefty Mar 2013 #185
and yet overdose of prescription meds, mainly painkillers, is now a bigger cause of death HiPointDem Mar 2013 #203
Intentional overdose? Auggie Mar 2013 #222
If you need narcotic pain meds, kurtzapril4 Mar 2013 #225
I don't know, but if the choice is between letting people in pain suffer and the chance that Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #238
I think much of it has to do with unrealistic expectations eallen Mar 2013 #7
Doctors also know time isn't really money. Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2013 #64
This was a major plank in Dr. Howard Dean's campaign...it's what drew me to him in the primaries alcibiades_mystery Mar 2013 #8
I know. Delphinus Mar 2013 #10
My mother had an advanced directive. When she was old and frail, after my brother had died CTyankee Mar 2013 #12
My grandfather lived to age 94 waddirum Mar 2013 #63
All I could do is talk to the doc and nurses about any pain management my mother needed. CTyankee Mar 2013 #133
Download your states Advanced Directives felix_numinous Mar 2013 #9
THANKS!!!!!!! for that website. I'll be downloading it. Auntie Bush Mar 2013 #19
Not a guarantee, but helps ellenrr Mar 2013 #106
I am not sure a doctor would honestly answer "What would you do" Grateful for Hope Mar 2013 #11
There's also the "not on my watch" scenario. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #13
Good point Grateful for Hope Mar 2013 #15
good doctors answer honestly. my Moms doctor ran down the details of life with Alzheimers.... bettyellen Mar 2013 #23
I absolutely know there are good doctors Grateful for Hope Mar 2013 #38
The country can't have this conversation zentrum Mar 2013 #41
Read this thread. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #47
Right wing bullies? They're all over DU, too. Try posting about that 87 year old pnwmom Mar 2013 #60
Corporations denying access to routine emergency care is more a right-wing thing, y'all. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #91
No. You just don't like this conversation because in an country where most lack access to... JVS Mar 2013 #67
+100. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #81
I don't think this incident is part of a huge healthcare conspiracy to deny the elderly care. pnwmom Mar 2013 #166
The last part of the OP's chart on how much money the last year of life costs didn't write itself. JVS Mar 2013 #186
This is the case of the largest 'senior living' corporation in the US refusing CPR to all residents HiPointDem Mar 2013 #204
it's true, I think they can go into "auto save" mode if that's the signal they are picking up from bettyellen Mar 2013 #46
Absolutely - Every patient needs an advocate. Grateful for Hope Mar 2013 #48
Same here, similar story onlyadream Mar 2013 #49
A good reminder to make sure all such forms and information are readily at hand Bibliovore Mar 2013 #107
Thanks - and that binder is a great idea onlyadream Mar 2013 #243
The cures we have are thanks to doctors who try, try, try JDPriestly Mar 2013 #52
For the most part, doctors do not develop cures. OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #120
not true, historically speaking. and plenty of research scientists are also doctors, so it may HiPointDem Mar 2013 #128
Oh really? OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #132
easily shown to be false. you don't know what you're talking about. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #134
Nice anecdotes. OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #223
Each person and his/her family has to make that JDPriestly Mar 2013 #172
I never said anything about CPR. OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #224
Elderly people and their children need to be educated JDPriestly Mar 2013 #241
Agree. OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #242
What do Americans not understand about statistics? ANYTHING AT ALL!! Moostache Mar 2013 #189
Yes -- but that same drive is what makes it so hard for doctors pnwmom Mar 2013 #216
Your mother's organs did not shut down because of the ventilator. WCLinolVir Mar 2013 #160
One of the doctors caring for my mom explained it to me... thecrow Mar 2013 #196
And some of those revived go on to live good lives. JDPriestly Mar 2013 #51
Although true Sgent Mar 2013 #74
Sepsis is a more critical condition than COPD or diabetes. The only thing an 18 year old with HiPointDem Mar 2013 #83
Just reread what I wrote Sgent Mar 2013 #108
I reread what you wrote. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #110
No not so much gasser85 Mar 2013 #192
I worked in a Physical Rehab Hospital for 10 years. Bozvotros Mar 2013 #214
It's called standard of care. Who wants to get sued? WCLinolVir Mar 2013 #161
I like what Woody Allen had to say: Martin Eden Mar 2013 #14
This advertisement brought to you by the health insurance industry. n/t Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #16
Yep, happens every once in a while a2liberal Mar 2013 #20
Interesting. I'm definitely pro DNR and always have been... DireStrike Mar 2013 #24
Hmm a2liberal Mar 2013 #27
Wait for it... Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #71
+100. It's actually these forces who wish to take away choice, as seen in the case of the biggest HiPointDem Mar 2013 #84
+1 JVS Mar 2013 #22
Didn't see that coming. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #25
It will work if a2liberal Mar 2013 #28
You really think a person who has a chance of surviving cancer UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #39
My point is they won't have the choice a2liberal Mar 2013 #76
You actually believe the claim in the graphic? That 'most' people say even with 'irreversible HiPointDem Mar 2013 #88
This is where I found it: UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #97
and now that i've tracked down a couple of the sources, here's some information. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #99
Yes, militating against it is the generally observed bias of people toward, y'know, staying alive . hatrack Mar 2013 #65
Did you write this? No. Then cut the "poor me" act. Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #68
Do you have any proof the insurance industry is behind this? UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #77
I repeat, quit being a sucker. n/t Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #89
That's what I thought. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #95
No, you didn't, and now you want somebody else to do it for you. Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #96
Harvested! UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #159
Um, already working. n/t GaYellowDawg Mar 2013 #105
Uh huh. People try to have a mature conversation about end of life care AtheistCrusader Mar 2013 #29
I had no idea I was so gullible. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #45
"Get sick" Hey, yeah, strawmen too. Why not. AtheistCrusader Mar 2013 #53
I agree with every word but that won't put a dent in their conspiracy theory. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #55
So, 'conspiracy' is the new DU catch-all accusation to shut down what you don't want to hear. Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #70
it's not new, though. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #92
Good point, just new to me. I've been called right wing, loony left, unrealistic, and an Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #94
Big Money bought reduced coverage, now it buys reduced expectations. Festivito Mar 2013 #150
That's the problem with these corporate Dems. Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #174
Big money made the bigger monster. Obamacare yields a smaller monster to fight later. Festivito Mar 2013 #237
+1 harun Mar 2013 #173
Great post malaise Mar 2013 #17
Hospice! That's what I will choose. longship Mar 2013 #18
Absolutely!!! Benton D Struckcheon Mar 2013 #66
Whatever way 10 of 10 insurance underwriters want me to die is what I hope to do the opposite of. JVS Mar 2013 #21
+1 (n/t) a2liberal Mar 2013 #32
+100. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #82
i am confused arely staircase Mar 2013 #30
I'm not a doctor, but I would refuse any attempt to treat a massive brain injury with chemotherapy. JVS Mar 2013 #35
which is why these numbers are so odd arely staircase Mar 2013 #86
the questions are posed in the context of having irreversible brain injury. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #146
i get that, which s why the mention of chemo is so odd arely staircase Mar 2013 #206
It meant that in a case where they already *had* an irreversible brain injury, they wouldn't HiPointDem Mar 2013 #207
then that makes total sense and answers my question arely staircase Mar 2013 #208
Also, I seriously doubt the claim that 'most' people say they would choose cpr if they had HiPointDem Mar 2013 #93
If we are lucky, we just pass on while sleeping liberal N proud Mar 2013 #31
Harry Nilsson had it right. alfredo Mar 2013 #33
More people make a living from cancer... retired rooster Mar 2013 #34
Sadly, this is a fact. Just as sadly, a majority of Americans are allergic to facts. n/t Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #90
What do they mean "no" on chemotherapy? 85% would just hope the cancer goes away? bloomington-lib Mar 2013 #36
I took it to mean "no to chemo" if you were in a stage of cancer UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #40
Yeah, having had people close to me go through chemo, Nye Bevan Mar 2013 #54
I've somehow managed to avoid that. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #59
My uncle did this. dkf Mar 2013 #69
According to the radio show reporting on the doctors study, the hypothetical context was HiPointDem Mar 2013 #100
In some elderly people cancer is very slow growing pnwmom Mar 2013 #62
I agree; that statement is wrong. Zoeisright Mar 2013 #170
Mom was resuscitated and died 2 weeks later - it was great. hollysmom Mar 2013 #43
Living will, advanced directives, euthanasia. n/t ProfessionalLeftist Mar 2013 #44
I witnessed CPR being given to a child who nearly drowned. JDPriestly Mar 2013 #50
having watched 4 parents die prolonged deaths.... bluemarkers Mar 2013 #56
when I got my First Aide/CPR training NMDemDist2 Mar 2013 #72
My dad's been through CPR twice. noamnety Mar 2013 #213
defibs are a different story NMDemDist2 Mar 2013 #235
He went through the standard CPR noamnety Mar 2013 #236
I am very lucky because Dignitas are just 2 hours away. idwiyo Mar 2013 #73
People Should Have End Of Life Options Here colsohlibgal Mar 2013 #75
BULLSHIT. "Most" people with "irreversible brain injury" want CPR? I seriously doubt it. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #78
K&R AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #79
Stupid Egnever Mar 2013 #98
Yes; CPR has a higher success rate when it's done by trained personnel and an even higher HiPointDem Mar 2013 #101
Have you ever done CPR? gasser85 Mar 2013 #195
yes, i've done cpr. my claim was that training and assistive equipment increases success rates HiPointDem Mar 2013 #199
Sorry no link gasser85 Mar 2013 #240
Thank you-A little reality here please. WCLinolVir Mar 2013 #163
As far as the graphic goes GaYellowDawg Mar 2013 #102
Looks like some of the info on that graphic is bogus, too. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #111
Universal health care isn't about keeping old people alive in vegetative states. OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #126
But it IS about GaYellowDawg Mar 2013 #180
I never said anything about CPR. OrwellwasRight Mar 2013 #226
This is very timely for me ellenrr Mar 2013 #103
I'm so sorry for your loss. Habibi Mar 2013 #136
I think the anti CPR tone in these posts is irresponsible. napoleon_in_rags Mar 2013 #104
The paper those statistics are taken from actually doesn't say that 3% wind up in a 'vegetative HiPointDem Mar 2013 #109
Its a misplaced agenda. napoleon_in_rags Mar 2013 #200
agreed. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #210
I question the stats and sources Android3.14 Mar 2013 #112
I checked the references at the bottom of the graphic. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #117
My father was a physician for over 50 years.... ColesCountyDem Mar 2013 #115
as a doctor Carolina Mar 2013 #116
not only the fault of the families though. the system, even where it mandates those discussions, HiPointDem Mar 2013 #119
True, too Carolina Mar 2013 #122
I'm quite willing to believe docs are on average less likely to want extrodinary measures at the HiPointDem Mar 2013 #124
medical care is expensive because Carolina Mar 2013 #164
"expensive because of the invasion of the businessmen, ie. the insurance corporations." HiPointDem Mar 2013 #202
With all due respect, doctor, your take on malpractice litigation marybourg Mar 2013 #178
Do you now or have you ever paid medical malpractice insuranace? Carolina Mar 2013 #179
And so you would have the victim or society at large bear the cost? marybourg Mar 2013 #184
You're already paying for the cost of malpractice insurance, you just don't realize it. Carolina Mar 2013 #188
So if all of us are paying for it, a fact of marybourg Mar 2013 #190
If you READ Carolina Mar 2013 #193
You're awesome. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #125
what? two doctors said that the graphic is true? where's that? HiPointDem Mar 2013 #130
What are the stats for North Korea? UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #139
lol. the last resort when you're losing the argument. goodbye. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #144
Yes. treestar Mar 2013 #171
The major problem with this concept... Nitram Mar 2013 #143
Honestly who cares what a doctor would do. Really. It is simple enough to have an advance directive. WCLinolVir Mar 2013 #155
+1 HiPointDem Mar 2013 #158
Get a directive for health care oldandhappy Mar 2013 #167
Exactly! But you should spell Carolina Mar 2013 #177
I also disagree with you here, doctor. marybourg Mar 2013 #182
Certainly, no one is omniscient Carolina Mar 2013 #187
yes. the more specificity, the better. and health care personnel should help by educating HiPointDem Mar 2013 #205
good points oldandhappy Mar 2013 #239
No doubt libodem Mar 2013 #168
It's about organ donation Duer 157099 Mar 2013 #181
because 87-year-old organs are highly desirable. actually, it's younger folks who should be HiPointDem Mar 2013 #201
Good point Duer 157099 Mar 2013 #209
I didn't think it was possible to out woo HiPointDem UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #215
Out woo? Duer 157099 Mar 2013 #217
Yeah, the guy who posts a graphic made by an unknown blogger containing misleading and HiPointDem Mar 2013 #220
Another reason why mandatory organ donation should never be legal. Dawson Leery Mar 2013 #211
This message was self-deleted by its author ErikJ Mar 2013 #212
good poster but it needs some diversity Liberal_in_LA Mar 2013 #221
k&r for an excellent, if heated, discussion. Laelth Mar 2013 #232
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A nightmare that doctors ...»Reply #207