Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(34,845 posts)

15. Exactly. There comes a point where you DO have to trust those in charge.

Fri Mar 8, 2013, 11:42 PM

Mar 2013

There is enough existing law defining 'imminent' and 'threat' that we don't need bullshit legislation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Down the rabbit hole time MotherPetrie Mar 2013 #1

Post removed Post removed Mar 2013 #3

What about- TexasProgresive Mar 2013 #4

i guess it depends on who the CIC is and if you voted for him or not. loli phabay Mar 2013 #5

What about it? jmg257 Mar 2013 #8

Because he has the power to regulate commerce? jmg257 Mar 2013 #14

And if it's Jeb Bush Politicalboi Mar 2013 #6

This is bullshit, as usual. randome Mar 2013 #7

Article I, section 7 of the Constitution disagrees with you. JDPriestly Mar 2013 #10

How many times has this scenario been mentioned? randome Mar 2013 #11

Rand Paul would have us issue the pilot a subpoena RB TexLa Mar 2013 #13

The president has the authority to do that because JDPriestly Mar 2013 #16

The president can only suspend habeas corpus in JDPriestly Mar 2013 #9