Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)

35. This bill says the following by implication

Reply to Egalitarian Thug (Reply #33)

Sat Mar 9, 2013, 01:18 AM

Mar 2013

1. It's okay to kill US citizens outside of the US by drones, for any reason.

2. It's okay to kill US citizens in the US using anything other than drones, and also for any reason.

That's what this statute says by singling out drones as the sole lethal mechanism which cannot be used against US citizens except in case of imminent threat.

Unfortunately, you have too much personal hostility to get past that in order to see how this bill can be objectively interpreted.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should the Senate pass the Cruz, Paul drone bill? [View all] ProSense Mar 2013 OP

It's like the umpteenth ban on federal funding of abortion jberryhill Mar 2013 #1

Full circle, and then some. n/t ProSense Mar 2013 #4

It seems like a good idea pscot Mar 2013 #2

It really should get a full debate ProSense Mar 2013 #5

No, it sounds like bad law cthulu2016 Mar 2013 #3

Why does Rand Paul support assaination from manned aircraft? jberryhill Mar 2013 #6

Adding to the arsenal, this ProSense Mar 2013 #10

Well, ProSense Mar 2013 #7

Why not? Broken clock and all that... Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #8

Yes, ProSense Mar 2013 #9

Okay, so... jberryhill Mar 2013 #13

What a brilliant retort. Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #18

Would you like to discuss the topic, or me? jberryhill Mar 2013 #26

You mean the topic you attempt to dismiss as inconsequential? Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #33

I don't know, ProSense Mar 2013 #34

This bill says the following by implication jberryhill Mar 2013 #35

Adam Serwer agrees ProSense Mar 2013 #37

Yes, and just imagine ProSense Mar 2013 #19

I'd rather see the Senate bill Cruz and Paul for droning. n/t winter is coming Mar 2013 #11

Nice play on words! Zorra Mar 2013 #46

How about we worry about the prison cells full of pot smokers, first? Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #12

I don't trust anything coming from Ted Cruz LeftInTX Mar 2013 #14

No because the sponsors of the bill have an ulterior motive Cali_Democrat Mar 2013 #15

LOL! ProSense Mar 2013 #25

Drones bad, gun ship OK? Stupid law that does nothing new. jmg257 Mar 2013 #16

Exactly. Fuck Rand Paul with Ted Cruz. randome Mar 2013 #27

Yes, based purely on the "key bill text" MannyGoldstein Mar 2013 #17

There are ProSense Mar 2013 #40

and if instead of drones, what if the weapon is a missile or a gun onenote Mar 2013 #20

Yup. n/t ProSense Mar 2013 #42

i don't understand why it should matter what citizen they are JI7 Mar 2013 #21

Might have something to do ProSense Mar 2013 #22

looks like he thinks it would be ok to use drones to kill someone JI7 Mar 2013 #23

Arizona Republicans' dream bill. n/t ProSense Mar 2013 #30

No. Peter cotton Mar 2013 #24

No, it doesn't go far enough. morningfog Mar 2013 #28

"Far enough"? ProSense Mar 2013 #41

I loathe Paul. And, this bill doesn't go far enough. morningfog Mar 2013 #43

His bill is a nightmare filled with loopholes. n/t ProSense Mar 2013 #47

Paul AND Cruz... automatically tells me my opinion. nt Comrade_McKenzie Mar 2013 #29

WTF Cha Mar 2013 #31

Does imminent mean in the very near future? creeksneakers2 Mar 2013 #32

Probably not. moondust Mar 2013 #36

If the policy doesn't fit on a bumper sticker... jberryhill Mar 2013 #38

Which means this should be popular: ProSense Mar 2013 #39

I dislike the suggestion the President has the right to kill unless Congress intervenes struggle4progress Mar 2013 #44

This issue, ProSense Mar 2013 #45