Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

MadHound

(34,179 posts)

27. Your posts in this thread speak for themselves,

Reply to babylonsister (Reply #18)

Sat Mar 9, 2013, 07:18 AM

Mar 2013

I can add no more. However all you can call me on re Paul is that he, and I, and fine folks like Eugen Robinson agree on the need for, "greater clarity about how and where our government believes it has the authority to use drones as instruments of assassination, especially when U.S. citizens are in the cross hairs."

Wasn't there, once upon a time when you questioned the morality of the drone program? Oh, yeah, about five years ago, when Bush was the one flying the drones. Now that it is a President with the D behind his name, here you are, on the side of these neocons.

What a sad, sad spectacle.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

David Frum: Why You Shouldn't #StandWithRand [View all] babylonsister Mar 2013 OP

I wish we on the 'left' had a firebrand that actually stood up and made some noise. Purveyor Mar 2013 #1

No, he did it to make money, not for any lofty goals... babylonsister Mar 2013 #2

Well then just plump up your silk pillow and sleep tight. He hit it 'outta the park' whatever Purveyor Mar 2013 #12

... babylonsister Mar 2013 #16

Indeed. You haven't a clue. eom Purveyor Mar 2013 #17

Actually since you're saying babylonsistah doesn't Cha Mar 2013 #19

Rand Paul set back the "drone issue" by associating himself with it. gulliver Mar 2013 #3

It also matters who writes this stuff; Frum is a staunch babylonsister Mar 2013 #4

Sounds like Glenn Beck Protalker Mar 2013 #5

Interesting cast of characters running interference for the President on this one, MadHound Mar 2013 #6

Oh, baloney. babylonsister Mar 2013 #7

Still they are running interference for the president, MadHound Mar 2013 #8

That's your perception; you have no clue what they're babylonsister Mar 2013 #9

LOL!, MadHound Mar 2013 #14

You are so full of crap, and I recognize that. babylonsister Mar 2013 #18

Your posts in this thread speak for themselves, MadHound Mar 2013 #27

Hell, Rand Paul is running interference himself Denzil_DC Mar 2013 #11

Noted, indeed. eom Purveyor Mar 2013 #13

... Comrade_McKenzie Mar 2013 #10

Clapping for 'David Frum'? Not surprised...not at all. eom Purveyor Mar 2013 #15

Meow. Cha Mar 2013 #20

�Be proud to be a decent American rather than just a wanker whipping up fear.� Cha Mar 2013 #21

Frum, Really? was Rush not available for you to glorify? You third wayers Dragonfli Mar 2013 #22

Oh really. What makes you think babylonsistah is "glorifying Frum"? Cha Mar 2013 #23

Get with the program! People do change. babylonsister Mar 2013 #24

Sorry, I will not be a cheerleader for Frum, Or Reagan, Or other Republican ideologues Dragonfli Mar 2013 #28

If you think David Frum is equivalent to Rush, YOU have the problem. nt babylonsister Mar 2013 #25

Posting a link by Frum Summer Hathaway Mar 2013 #26