Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The sad truth behind yesterday's unemployment numbers [View all]KoKo
(84,711 posts)33. Dean Baker seems to agree:
Don't Be Fooled: 7.7% Is Likely a Short-Lived Low in the US Unemployment Rate
by Dean Baker
Dean Baker is the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).
Looking beyond this report, though, there is not much reason for optimism. Housing construction is rising, but from a very low base. It had fallen back to just 2.0% of GDP, so even a 20% growth rate would add just 0.4 percentage points to GDP growth. The most recent data on investment shows a sharp drop, albeit after three months of good growth. We will be fortunate if this category grows at more than a 10% annual rate in 2013.
While an upward revision to the fourth quarter GDP data turned a negative 0.1% into a positive 0.1%, the economy still only grew at a 1.6% annual rate in the second half of 2012. Apart from the uptick in construction, there are few good reasons to expect much of an acceleration from this growth rate. And contrary-wise, the ending of the payroll tax cut will pull more than $100bn a year out of the economy. The impact of this tax increase was just being felt when the February jobs survey was taken in the middle of the month.
The other big hit to the economy will be from the sequester, which will pull roughly $80bn in federal spending out of the economy. The forecasts from the Congressional Budget Office and others show the sequester slowing growth by 0.5-0.6 percentage points. The economy has not even begun to feel the impact of these cuts, most of which will not start to make their effects felt until April.
In short, we have an economy that had been growing at a not-very-healthy pace through the second half of 2012 and which is virtually certain to be slowed by contractionary fiscal policy through the rest of 2013. Unless there is a rapid reversal of policy, the 7.7% unemployment rate is likely to represent a low we may not see again for some time.
While the economy is not likely to fall into a recession and send the unemployment rate soaring, the economy is not growing fast enough to meet the need for jobs from a growing labor force. As a result, unemployment will be going in the wrong direction for the rest of the year.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That's the BS that we are fed and expected to eat with a smile. The Main Street economy
Egalitarian Thug
Mar 2013
#12
"it was a deliberate, bipartisan effort begun under reagan and accelerated to warp speed under
Egalitarian Thug
Mar 2013
#37
baloney. the intent was to make it easier for banksters to make money. everything follows
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#60
Every crash, every large-scale job loss results in return of mostly lower paying jobs later
ProfessionalLeftist
Mar 2013
#10
When I read that "massaged the unemployment numbers" line I thought I was reading a ...
JoePhilly
Mar 2013
#26
There was an article yesterday which covered these numbers and said "...the economy surges!"
Poll_Blind
Mar 2013
#25
Reagan's big pre-84 trick was to include the military for the first time - 100% employed group.
talkingmime
Mar 2013
#36
masks a ton of people who've dropped out of the official economy. labor force participation rate:
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#49
Do they plug in the numbers for those that are getting a second or third job in this report?
Knightraven
Mar 2013
#52