Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The sad truth behind yesterday's unemployment numbers [View all]MadHound
(34,179 posts)38. Really?
So can you prove, or link to something you consider more truthful, because looking at the WSWS article, it doesn't look like they are misinterpreting or making up a thing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That's the BS that we are fed and expected to eat with a smile. The Main Street economy
Egalitarian Thug
Mar 2013
#12
"it was a deliberate, bipartisan effort begun under reagan and accelerated to warp speed under
Egalitarian Thug
Mar 2013
#37
baloney. the intent was to make it easier for banksters to make money. everything follows
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#60
Every crash, every large-scale job loss results in return of mostly lower paying jobs later
ProfessionalLeftist
Mar 2013
#10
When I read that "massaged the unemployment numbers" line I thought I was reading a ...
JoePhilly
Mar 2013
#26
There was an article yesterday which covered these numbers and said "...the economy surges!"
Poll_Blind
Mar 2013
#25
Reagan's big pre-84 trick was to include the military for the first time - 100% employed group.
talkingmime
Mar 2013
#36
masks a ton of people who've dropped out of the official economy. labor force participation rate:
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#49
Do they plug in the numbers for those that are getting a second or third job in this report?
Knightraven
Mar 2013
#52