Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: State single payer moving right along [View all]eridani
(51,907 posts)64. Assembly Health Chair: 2013 ‘A Superb Year’ To Pass Single-Payer Insurance
http://statepolitics.lohudblogs.com/2013/03/07/assembly-health-chair-2013-a-superb-year-to-pass-single-payer-insurance/
Assembly Health Committee Chairman Richard Gottfried, D-Manhattan, has carried a single-payer health care bill in New York for more than two decades. But Thursday, he said this is the year it will pass.
The bill, dubbed New York Health, replaces insurance company coverage with publicly sponsored universal health insurance. Patients contribute to the program based on their ability to pay, so higher-wage earners pay a higher percentage and low-income workers pay less.
A similar bill passed in Vermont in 2011. In New York, the bill has passed the Assembly only oncein 1992.
Getting a bill like this to the floor and passed takes a lot of work from advocacy groups. And over the years, advocacy groups from year-to-year have been more focused on what were seen as more urgent, pressing issues, including fighting for better health care reform at the federal level, Gottfried said Thursday at a noon news conference. I think this year is really a superb year to refocus that effort on this issue, and I expect that to happen.
He said he is optimistic about the bills chances in the Assembly, where it has 74 sponsors. Sen. Bill Perkins, also a Manhattan Democrat, used the word optimistic as well to describe his feelings about the bills outcome in the Senate, where there are 11 sponsors.
Gottfried dismissed the argument that New York should wait to see the full implementation of the federal Affordable Care Act before changing to a universal health-care system.
He said he knows how the Affordable Care Act will work.
We know what things it tries to change and what things it doesnt try to change, he said. It doesnt prevent insurance companies from skyrocketing premiums. It doesnt give us premiums based on ability to pay. We already see the insurance industry moving to jack up premiums in anticipation of the ACA. We already see a growing number of employers planning on dropping health coverage. We see more and more insurance plans having high deductibles, which to most people, means youre paying premiums, and youre getting nothing in exchange. And the core of the ACA is to leave the vast majority of us in the hands of insurance companies.
So theres really nothing that we need to wait to see how it works, because its all out on the table, we can do a lot better, he finished.
Assembly Health Committee Chairman Richard Gottfried, D-Manhattan, has carried a single-payer health care bill in New York for more than two decades. But Thursday, he said this is the year it will pass.
The bill, dubbed New York Health, replaces insurance company coverage with publicly sponsored universal health insurance. Patients contribute to the program based on their ability to pay, so higher-wage earners pay a higher percentage and low-income workers pay less.
A similar bill passed in Vermont in 2011. In New York, the bill has passed the Assembly only oncein 1992.
Getting a bill like this to the floor and passed takes a lot of work from advocacy groups. And over the years, advocacy groups from year-to-year have been more focused on what were seen as more urgent, pressing issues, including fighting for better health care reform at the federal level, Gottfried said Thursday at a noon news conference. I think this year is really a superb year to refocus that effort on this issue, and I expect that to happen.
He said he is optimistic about the bills chances in the Assembly, where it has 74 sponsors. Sen. Bill Perkins, also a Manhattan Democrat, used the word optimistic as well to describe his feelings about the bills outcome in the Senate, where there are 11 sponsors.
Gottfried dismissed the argument that New York should wait to see the full implementation of the federal Affordable Care Act before changing to a universal health-care system.
He said he knows how the Affordable Care Act will work.
We know what things it tries to change and what things it doesnt try to change, he said. It doesnt prevent insurance companies from skyrocketing premiums. It doesnt give us premiums based on ability to pay. We already see the insurance industry moving to jack up premiums in anticipation of the ACA. We already see a growing number of employers planning on dropping health coverage. We see more and more insurance plans having high deductibles, which to most people, means youre paying premiums, and youre getting nothing in exchange. And the core of the ACA is to leave the vast majority of us in the hands of insurance companies.
So theres really nothing that we need to wait to see how it works, because its all out on the table, we can do a lot better, he finished.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But at the same time, the NY legislature is defunding programs for the disabed, so I don't
Squinch
Mar 2013
#47
How can we be the Greatest nation on earth, if we can't/won't even take care of our own citizens?
RC
Mar 2013
#3
Even if they say you need to be a resident are they then going to leave these people on the side
dkf
Mar 2013
#30
Countries that actually have single-payer generally provide true emergency care only to foreigners
Lydia Leftcoast
Mar 2013
#18
Exactly. Though many might be tempted to visit a "Single Payer" State for treatment...
Tom Rinaldo
Mar 2013
#20
Presumably, there could be a residency requirement. But you also have to think of the size
jeff47
Mar 2013
#24
Single payer is going to happen. Our current system has been a mess, providing miniscule coverage
mother earth
Mar 2013
#12
Even faster, if all the army medics were trained to become nurse practitioners or physician's
Lydia Leftcoast
Mar 2013
#19
I'm talking about nurse-practitioners and PA's, who can perform routine checkups and treat minor
Lydia Leftcoast
Mar 2013
#43
And our dumb state (WI) is gutting our once great public health insurance program
AllyCat
Mar 2013
#21
Paying my health insurance is crushing our family business. The premiums are INSANE.
KittyWampus
Mar 2013
#22
way to go NY. Here in Co. our new Democratic majority is moving gun regulation
mountain grammy
Mar 2013
#29
And will some doctors be able to opt out altogether, like they can with Medicaid? n/t
pnwmom
Mar 2013
#57
Only if they don't want any patients except for those wealthy enough to opt out n/t
eridani
Mar 2013
#58
The Federal Court has ruled you can become a resident of a state within 30 days
happyslug
Mar 2013
#45