Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
64. Assembly Health Chair: 2013 ‘A Superb Year’ To Pass Single-Payer Insurance
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 05:33 AM
Mar 2013
http://statepolitics.lohudblogs.com/2013/03/07/assembly-health-chair-2013-a-superb-year-to-pass-single-payer-insurance/

Assembly Health Committee Chairman Richard Gottfried, D-Manhattan, has carried a single-payer health care bill in New York for more than two decades. But Thursday, he said this is the year it will pass.

The bill, dubbed New York Health, replaces insurance company coverage with publicly sponsored universal health insurance. Patients contribute to the program based on their “ability to pay,” so higher-wage earners pay a higher percentage and low-income workers pay less.

A similar bill passed in Vermont in 2011. In New York, the bill has passed the Assembly only once—in 1992.
“Getting a bill like this to the floor and passed takes a lot of work from advocacy groups. And over the years, advocacy groups from year-to-year have been more focused on what were seen as more urgent, pressing issues, including fighting for better health care reform at the federal level,” Gottfried said Thursday at a noon news conference. “I think this year is really a superb year to refocus that effort on this issue, and I expect that to happen.”
He said he is “optimistic” about the bill’s chances in the Assembly, where it has 74 sponsors. Sen. Bill Perkins, also a Manhattan Democrat, used the word “optimistic” as well to describe his feelings about the bill’s outcome in the Senate, where there are 11 sponsors.

Gottfried dismissed the argument that New York should wait to see the full implementation of the federal Affordable Care Act before changing to a universal health-care system.

He said he knows how the Affordable Care Act will work.

“We know what things it tries to change and what things it doesn’t try to change,” he said. “It doesn’t prevent insurance companies from skyrocketing premiums. It doesn’t give us premiums based on ability to pay. We already see the insurance industry moving to jack up premiums in anticipation of the ACA. We already see a growing number of employers planning on dropping health coverage. We see more and more insurance plans having high deductibles, which to most people, means you’re paying premiums, and you’re getting nothing in exchange. And the core of the ACA is to leave the vast majority of us in the hands of insurance companies.

“So there’s really nothing that we need to wait to see how it works, because it’s all out on the table, we can do a lot better,” he finished.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How likely is this to pass? drm604 Mar 2013 #1
I'd imagine that something like this will take a lot of time to pass Victor_c3 Mar 2013 #4
When it happens, companies will FLOOD in to "create jobs".. SoCalDem Mar 2013 #54
Make it happen with Health Care for All--PA eridani Mar 2013 #6
It won't happen with our current state government. drm604 Mar 2013 #23
I think it's very likely to pass in NY State.... ReRe Mar 2013 #55
All I can say is "wow!" Victor_c3 Mar 2013 #2
But at the same time, the NY legislature is defunding programs for the disabed, so I don't Squinch Mar 2013 #47
How can we be the Greatest nation on earth, if we can't/won't even take care of our own citizens? RC Mar 2013 #3
Agreed Plucketeer Mar 2013 #25
You're not serious about that "greates nation on earth" nonsense are you? xtraxritical Mar 2013 #50
Well, we could rightfully claim that at one time RC Mar 2013 #53
What time was that, before the Europeans got here? xtraxritical Mar 2013 #59
Sounds about right. RC Mar 2013 #61
That's all you got from my post? RC Mar 2013 #62
Wow. ananda Mar 2013 #5
Check out state chapters of Physicians for a National Health Program eridani Mar 2013 #7
Well that state used to be my state of Calif. Left Coast2020 Mar 2013 #56
Wouldn't single payer in one state lead to reverse cherry-picking? Jim Lane Mar 2013 #8
Most state single payer bills have residency requirements n/t eridani Mar 2013 #9
And how difficult is that? dkf Mar 2013 #11
If you had to be a resident for two years to qualify... thesquanderer Mar 2013 #46
Not to mention which, single payer doesn't give people jobs or housing n/t eridani Mar 2013 #51
That's what I am wondering. dkf Mar 2013 #10
Of course you were Capt. Obvious Mar 2013 #28
Even if they say you need to be a resident are they then going to leave these people on the side dkf Mar 2013 #30
That's exactly what's happening in Vermont right now Capt. Obvious Mar 2013 #36
If they want to take that on more power to them. dkf Mar 2013 #39
But such elderly people are 100% covered by Medicare and Medicaid. happyslug Mar 2013 #44
Vermont has not yet implemented single-payer. Jim Lane Mar 2013 #49
Just speculating here, but I don't think that it would be unmanagable Tom Rinaldo Mar 2013 #13
Countries that actually have single-payer generally provide true emergency care only to foreigners Lydia Leftcoast Mar 2013 #18
Exactly. Though many might be tempted to visit a "Single Payer" State for treatment... Tom Rinaldo Mar 2013 #20
Or you could be desperate. dkf Mar 2013 #31
Yes. It might make sense for many but human nature being what it is... Tom Rinaldo Mar 2013 #34
You'd have to qualify to be a resident The Blue Flower Mar 2013 #17
Presumably, there could be a residency requirement. But you also have to think of the size jeff47 Mar 2013 #24
Yes, that would be tragic. (Not.) eggplant Mar 2013 #42
There's no call to make your analogy to slavery. Jim Lane Mar 2013 #48
Single payer is going to happen. Our current system has been a mess, providing miniscule coverage mother earth Mar 2013 #12
Watching Dan Rather this morning, he was speaking of all of the dotymed Mar 2013 #14
Even faster, if all the army medics were trained to become nurse practitioners or physician's Lydia Leftcoast Mar 2013 #19
Do we have a nurse shortage? dkf Mar 2013 #32
I'm talking about nurse-practitioners and PA's, who can perform routine checkups and treat minor Lydia Leftcoast Mar 2013 #43
hooray riverbendviewgal Mar 2013 #15
Gun control, fracking, single payer... bluedigger Mar 2013 #16
Very good things theKed Mar 2013 #33
Do they have a supermajority? bluedigger Mar 2013 #35
I'm not sure theKed Mar 2013 #37
And our dumb state (WI) is gutting our once great public health insurance program AllyCat Mar 2013 #21
Paying my health insurance is crushing our family business. The premiums are INSANE. KittyWampus Mar 2013 #22
This is fucking awesome! Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2013 #26
++++++++! BrotherIvan Mar 2013 #27
I've never understood that, either. Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2013 #41
way to go NY. Here in Co. our new Democratic majority is moving gun regulation mountain grammy Mar 2013 #29
I was hopeful of this.... Wounded Bear Mar 2013 #38
How does this work with different doctors charging different rates? pnwmom Mar 2013 #40
Under global budgeting, health care providers would negotiate yearly with the eridani Mar 2013 #52
And will some doctors be able to opt out altogether, like they can with Medicaid? n/t pnwmom Mar 2013 #57
Only if they don't want any patients except for those wealthy enough to opt out n/t eridani Mar 2013 #58
The Federal Court has ruled you can become a resident of a state within 30 days happyslug Mar 2013 #45
Kick for progressive change Politicub Mar 2013 #60
Kick Quantess Mar 2013 #63
Assembly Health Chair: 2013 ‘A Superb Year’ To Pass Single-Payer Insurance eridani Mar 2013 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»State single payer moving...»Reply #64