Glenn Greenwald defend Rand Paul against "Democratic myths"

[Waiting For Everyman]

39. Jury results: 1-5 Leave It

At Sun Mar 10, 2013, 01:20 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

You're welcome
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2485801

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

"I mean, clearly by supporting Rand Paul's drone bill, you've demonstrated Greenwald-like principles."

Essentially accusing Blankenship of being a Republican or Tea Bagger -- but Blankenship never even said he supported the bill!


You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Mar 10, 2013, 01:34 PM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: That's an opinion, not an insult. I don't particularly like Prosense, but this post doesn't violate community standards.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: You're trying to hide inferences now? Not just no, but hell no.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Sorry alerter, just not seeing the connection. And yes, I read the whole thread. PS and KB seem to be doing fine on their own. Let them hash it out.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: I agree with the person who alerted. Reading the source article without the commentary of the OP should be encouraged. Why even post a link to the article, if you don't want anyone to read it?

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.