General Discussion

Marr

(20,317 posts)

85. Do you understand what the word "agree" means?

Mon Mar 11, 2013, 01:10 AM

Mar 2013

If Hitler said, "brownies are delicious", I would have to admit that I agreed with Hitler on the subject of brownies. That wouldn't mean I thought Hitler was a super-keen dude and that I'm down with the whole Nazi thing. It would mean that I agree that brownies are delicious.

If you really can't understand that concept, then I'll just save my time.

Actually... now that I think about it... I think you're just feigning stupidity in order to bump your own thread here. I'll stop giving you the excuse now. Have a good night.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

99 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Glenn Greenwald defend Rand Paul against "Democratic myths" [View all] ProSense Mar 2013 OP

Hypocrisy - Thy Name Is Rand Paul cantbeserious Mar 2013 #1

Glenn Greenwald is a consistent principled progressive DesMoinesDem Mar 2013 #2

You, ProSense Mar 2013 #3

You do understand that it is Obama ordering these drone strikes DesMoinesDem Mar 2013 #5

Wait: ProSense Mar 2013 #7

More deflections from you. DesMoinesDem Mar 2013 #12

No, ProSense Mar 2013 #13

Geeze roxy1234 Mar 2013 #16

A few ProSense Mar 2013 #18

I agree roxy1234 Mar 2013 #19

Wait, rewind, go back... brentspeak Mar 2013 #37

Wait ProSense Mar 2013 #38

Also, can you ProSense Mar 2013 #8

Wow. The Rand Paul love is getting a little thick around here...nt SidDithers Mar 2013 #53

Glenn Greenwald is interning for a position as lap dog to the "citizens of the archipelagos". patrice Mar 2013 #11

"Glenn Greenwald is a consistent principled progressive..." Thanks, DesMoinesDem.... truth2power Mar 2013 #20

Message auto-removed BO 08 Mar 2013 #43

Wrong: he's a dogmatic libertarian, and that's not always coterminous with "progressive" frazzled Mar 2013 #21

Thx for the link to a new post by Greenwald - Will Read 4 sure now. kenny blankenship Mar 2013 #4

You're welcome ProSense Mar 2013 #6

Jury results: 1-5 Leave It Waiting For Everyman Mar 2013 #39

That a person ProSense Mar 2013 #40

Eric Holder is a lawyer... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #9

Ah, the ProSense Mar 2013 #10

Yes there are many issues to be discussed... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #14

What ProSense Mar 2013 #17

Okay I will keep this real simple... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #29

Better yet, ProSense Mar 2013 #32

In other words... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #34

Where's ProSense Mar 2013 #35

I notice you studiously avoid... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #42

Ah, ProSense Mar 2013 #45

Guess I hit a nerve there, eh? ljm2002 Mar 2013 #46

No, ProSense Mar 2013 #47

That makes me proud. ljm2002 Mar 2013 #48

LOL! n/t ProSense Mar 2013 #49

"Rand Paul is a hypocrite and an asshole." - Yes. cheapdate Mar 2013 #15

Of course you know whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #22

The OP ProSense Mar 2013 #25

How many are okay with targeted killings but were outraged by warrantless wiretaps? LittleBlue Mar 2013 #23

Here ProSense Mar 2013 #26

Any kook with a website can gain a following these days. Comrade_McKenzie Mar 2013 #24

Yeah, so did rush limbaugh.. rand paul was spouting glen on the Senate Cha Mar 2013 #27

that reads like so much _____ to me stupidicus Mar 2013 #28

Speaking of ProSense Mar 2013 #30

right stupidicus Mar 2013 #59

But it ProSense Mar 2013 #62

Sure stupidicus Mar 2013 #87

Rand paul is a libertarian douche, but he still has legitimate concerns about drones NoMoreWarNow Mar 2013 #31

So ProSense Mar 2013 #33

So your point is... what? That Rand Paul *actually* agrees with YOU? Marr Mar 2013 #58

I think ProSense Mar 2013 #61

One thing Rand Paul did do customerserviceguy Mar 2013 #36

Exactly, ProSense Mar 2013 #41

Lawrence O'Donnell noticed him.. Cha Mar 2013 #63

Greeenwald is a clown...nt SidDithers Mar 2013 #44

That is an insightful assessment and deserves a thorough response. Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #50

Can always count on you to defend the Paul-loving libertarian... SidDithers Mar 2013 #51

I love you, too. My affection for you is somewhere between Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #52

Let's check the Clown Scale whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #70

Timely and important!!... SidDithers Mar 2013 #86

Glad to see you enjoying yourself whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #88

Classy... SidDithers Mar 2013 #89

Me thinks SidDithers whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #90

Why'd you edit your post?...nt SidDithers Mar 2013 #91

Because I thought better of it whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #92

Uh huh... SidDithers Mar 2013 #93

Why am I not surprised? jazzimov Mar 2013 #54

You side with John Bolton on this issue, I know. /nt Marr Mar 2013 #55

And ProSense Mar 2013 #56

Surely you can understand this concept if you try. Look-- Marr Mar 2013 #57

It's good ProSense Mar 2013 #60

Oh, c'mon-- are you still pretending you can't comprehend this? Marr Mar 2013 #64

So ProSense Mar 2013 #65

What fantasy? Marr Mar 2013 #69

Here's what I know, ProSense Mar 2013 #71

You're quoting my post from this very thread like it's some long lost, damning evidence. Marr Mar 2013 #79

Oooh ProSense Mar 2013 #83

Do you understand what the word "agree" means? Marr Mar 2013 #85

You would ProSense Mar 2013 #94

You're simply dodging an sentence you don't like the sound of. Marr Mar 2013 #96

So ProSense Mar 2013 #97

More feigned stupidity. Marr Mar 2013 #98

Hey, ProSense Mar 2013 #99

Just read Greenwald's piece whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #66

Do you ProSense Mar 2013 #68

I agree with Greenwald *not* Paul whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #72

Actually, ProSense Mar 2013 #73

Sorry whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #76

Are you ProSense Mar 2013 #77

Why so opaque? whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #78

Yes, ProSense Mar 2013 #80

Ok whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #82

Greenwald, like Paul and Turley, is a professional troll struggle4progress Mar 2013 #67

Wyden a "professional troll"? nt green for victory Mar 2013 #74

No ProSense Mar 2013 #75

Wyden's efforts for Congressional oversight seem appropriate to me. But, of course, struggle4progress Mar 2013 #81

+1 freshwest Mar 2013 #95

2 and 2 make four, no matter who says it, BUT DonCoquixote Mar 2013 #84