General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Theatrical Slut Shaming: Daily Caller Attacks Ashley Judd For Nude Scenes [View all]SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)SoCalDem (99,028 posts)
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 01:44 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022463150
Ashley Judd's run for office (will she?) will be ugly..count on it.
It's different when an actress runs for office.
Ronald Reagan got some good-natured ribbing over the Bonzo movies he made, but other than being a not-very-good- B actor, that was about the extent of it.
Young women who are starting a career, often HAVE to "bare some skin" in order to get acting jobs, and once it's on film, it's always there and will always haunt them, when they shift to more mainstream/political endeavors.
Young female actors are usually eye-candy and do not carry a film. They are there because they are pretty, sexy and the men who see the film will fantasize about them.
Young male actors are nice to look at too, but they can get their start by being in action films, or as the buddy of the star, and their early work usually is clothed, since the star is the one who is intended to be the one in the limelight.
Scott Brown's playful "nude" picture is not in the same vein, and as a man, was not the issue it would be for a woman doing the exact same thing.
Nudity in movies is usually tied into sex scenes, which are acting, but are intended to be titillating.
Even as a woman ages and becomes less "starlet-y", her early work lives on and she is constantly compared to what she "used to look like".
I have no doubt that Ashley Judd would be a better senator than the chinless-wonder has ever been, and I hope she can weather the storm that is sure to come her way.. Look at the dirt they have already dished just in case she runs..