General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Food stamp bills seek to restrict junk food [View all]CreekDog
(46,192 posts)You just ooze contempt for poor people and those receiving child support if you deem that they have something that you don't.
Jeez, if someone is on food stamps, they have less than you. You've posted multiple times that your household makes over 100k here. Nobody on food stamps has anywhere close to those resources coming in.
So whether or not they have Twinkies or Doritos (or whatever stereotype about poor people you're trying to peddle here today), they still have a lower standard of living, less resources and more financial instability than you do.
Jeez, if your hope is that they know they're poor and they don't ever feel like they're living the life that you say you've earned, almost any poor person knows they have less than you. Period.
Some junk food isn't going to change their overall lot or overall level of poverty. In this country, being poor sucks worse than most countries.
How about doing something useful and not using every single post to undermine and criticize anti-poverty programs and support to ex-spouses and child support (both of which mainly support the most impoverished groups in the United States: single mothers with children post-divorce).
You could try doing something useful here, instead of what you have been doing, which is to spend all your posts blasting and blaming the most downtrodden members of our society (and some of that blast is towards children who should NEVER be scapegoated EVER).
And please get over your victimhood. You talk conservative talking points --did you know a big conservative theme is to criticize those who consider themselves victims? Stop complaining that you're a victim when you aren't and do something constructive to make this a better society towards those who don't deserve their lot of poverty and lack of sustenance.