General Discussion

99Forever

(14,524 posts)

66. That's right Steve, make it about me personally.

Reply to stevenleser (Reply #64)

Tue Mar 12, 2013, 01:17 PM

Mar 2013

Don't answer the questions. Bob and weave, and dance.

Very impressive.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

101 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

*It's not about Rand Paul!* [View all] whatchamacallit Mar 2013 OP

Well, when Rand gets droned on... RobertEarl Mar 2013 #1

Heh, I won't hold my breath... whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #2

Yes, it is about Ron & Rand Paul and his BFF David Duke & his John Birch Society backing. graham4anything Mar 2013 #3

Tell that ProSense Mar 2013 #4

You won't be able to ride this latest wave of Greenwald/Paul derangement much longer whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #5

Have you ProSense Mar 2013 #7

I haven't read it, but I will now n/t whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #8

Any Democratic Senator who wants to undermine Rand Paul can step us and oppose Obama's drone policy. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #32

O.k. Get rid of drones Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2013 #46

So the best that you have is a straw-man argument while relying upon ad hominem fallacy? AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #47

Hey, while you're at it... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #26

Message auto-removed BO 08 Mar 2013 #27

I think you may have missed my point... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #28

Is there ProSense Mar 2013 #29

"There are people validating Rand Paul" ljm2002 Mar 2013 #30

No ProSense Mar 2013 #68

So your worry is... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #69

No ProSense Mar 2013 #70

No ljm2002 Mar 2013 #71

Wait, ProSense Mar 2013 #74

"Didn't I already respond"... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #75

OK, ProSense Mar 2013 #76

I must say... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #78

This ProSense Mar 2013 #79

Here's a quick logic lesson... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #81

That's not ProSense Mar 2013 #82

Well thanks for demonstrating... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #83

LOL! ProSense Mar 2013 #84

Maybe what you need is an English lesson... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #85

Maybe ProSense Mar 2013 #86

"what you need is a hobby" ljm2002 Mar 2013 #87

Oh, ProSense Mar 2013 #88

"I have a hobby"... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #89

LOL! ProSense Mar 2013 #91

You say "No means No"... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #90

Here: ProSense Mar 2013 #92

Avoiding the question again, I see... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #93

Yes, ProSense Mar 2013 #94

So the "No, to the first"... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #95

So ProSense Mar 2013 #96

Here: ljm2002 Mar 2013 #97

. ProSense Mar 2013 #99

. ljm2002 Mar 2013 #100

Captain Double Standard strikes again! /nt Marr Mar 2013 #34

Thanks for posting this... I had not seen this:"If you happen to be the son of a bad person, is that midnight Mar 2013 #51

They were supporting Bolton's position in this thread: NOVA_Dem Mar 2013 #54

I never once had concerns that Obama would drone us. Or shoot us, or bayonet us, etc. TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #6

I agree re: Obama, but fear potential others, both now since it doesn't say it must be Obama Lionessa Mar 2013 #10

That's reassuring. 99Forever Mar 2013 #11

Why is this an issue now? I was never in a panic that any President would do this. TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #13

Is English not your first language? 99Forever Mar 2013 #25

Right, because before drones, there was no way an evil President could kill people stevenleser Mar 2013 #31

Minimizing and condescending garbage. 99Forever Mar 2013 #44

You realize your only response was in the form of a logical fallacy, right? stevenleser Mar 2013 #63

Here is some help, read about the guilt by association fallacy in this link stevenleser Mar 2013 #64

That's right Steve, make it about me personally. 99Forever Mar 2013 #66

Your assertions were fallacious. I'm sorry you are having problems accepting that. stevenleser Mar 2013 #67

No one needs to be concerned about the use of physical force against those who wish to speak up? AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #35

Police brutality and oppression of peaceful protest are a concern, but not quite in the same league TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #39

You have to be patient. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #40

Stories of Police overseeing OWS were doing just that... Plotting Assinations.... midnight Mar 2013 #55

Your argument is no more than: "We should trust our government!". Romulox Mar 2013 #73

Heh. zappaman Mar 2013 #9

You know nothing of Zappa do you? whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #12

Pretty sure he would have said zappaman Mar 2013 #14

As he may have been a libertarian, probably not whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #15

He didn't like ANY politicians zappaman Mar 2013 #16

Brilliant! whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #17

You're welcome! zappaman Mar 2013 #18

Guess you didn't bother to read or couldn't comprehend the OP whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #20

I'm sure he appreciates your support! zappaman Mar 2013 #21

Intellectual dishonesty whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #22

That would slow things down. n/t AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #36

Simpleton Underground bobduca Mar 2013 #77

It just shows the moral bankruptcy of the drone thing quinnox Mar 2013 #19

Wait ProSense Mar 2013 #23

Here is the key text of the bill... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #38

My take is different whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #24

That's more accurate, yep. /nt Marr Mar 2013 #37

The executive branch doesn't have enough power. Comrade_McKenzie Mar 2013 #33

It is always about who and not what with some, it is their entire measure. TheKentuckian Mar 2013 #41

the fact that many do not see this.... dtom67 Mar 2013 #42

Not a Rand Paul fan at all Demo_Chris Mar 2013 #43

Good question whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #45

Where was Sen Warren? She was spending her time trying to actually do something about the banksters AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #49

I'm glad to hear that. What was she doing about the bankers? n/t Demo_Chris Mar 2013 #52

You're not keeping informed about that? AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #53

Actually, I just looked it up for myself n/t Demo_Chris Mar 2013 #58

I agree we need others besides Rand Paul.. But Paul Wellstone warned us that their are those in midnight Mar 2013 #48

They seem to be in ascendancy right now whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #50

When you use his arguments, it is. baldguy Mar 2013 #56

Oh brother... whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #59

You're saying "It's not about Rand Paul", but you don't even know what he's saying???? baldguy Mar 2013 #60

I know he asked questions many of us have been asking for some time whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #61

and it is about those who didn't ask many, many questions G_j Mar 2013 #57

You're correct. It's NOT about Rand Paul. And he's only a gift of shovels truth2power Mar 2013 #62

Of course it isn't about Rand Paul, MadHound Mar 2013 #65

Paul was pandering to the black helicopters/militia/Ruby Ridge/McVeigh geek tragedy Mar 2013 #72

That's his constituency mwrguy Mar 2013 #80

fuck rand paul. he cares about rand paul. spanone Mar 2013 #98

Ok whatchamacallit Mar 2013 #101