Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Smilo

(2,038 posts)
26. It seems U.S. fighter pilots have lost that loving feeling for their new F-35 stealth jets.
Tue Mar 12, 2013, 03:42 PM
Mar 2013

At least that’s the impression given in a scathing Pentagon report leaked this week that identifies a huge number of problems facing the U.S. military’s F-35 fleet — including fears that it can easily be shot down.

From radars that don’t work, to blurry vision from the aircraft’s sophisticated helmet, to an inability to fly through clouds, the report, which includes pilot comments, paints a picture of a jet nowhere near ready for real-life operations.

F-35 manufacturer Lockheed Martin is refusing to comment, but the report’s revelations will likely give Canadian military planners pause as they continue assessing options for replacing Canada’s aging CF-18s.

The February report from the Pentagon’s chief testing office is based on trial run at the U.S. military’s Eglin Air Force Base in Florida from September to November of last year.

The testing, which was supposed to determine whether aircraft the U.S. had already bought from Lockheed Martin were good enough to start training U.S. fighter pilots with, was actually supposed to take place in August 2011.

But it had to be postponed because a number of critical issues were identified in the aircraft — the majority of which remained unresolved more than a year later.

Because those problems — including issues with the ejector seat — hadn’t been resolved, only experienced U.S. Air Force pilots were allowed to participate in the two-month test.

In addition, a second aircraft had to follow the first at all times, and engine starts had to be monitored with a special equipment to reduce the likelihood of a fire.

Even then, the testing was extremely basic and “did not cover . . . in essence, everything that makes the F-35A a modern, advanced fighter,” reads the report, obtained by the Washington-based watchdog group Project on Government Oversight.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/03/06/f-35-design-problems-make-night-flying-impossible-increase-risk-of-being-shot-down-u-s-pilots-warn/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If we can't afford to educate our children, to heal our sick or care for our elderly ... Scuba Mar 2013 #1
For all those aerial dogfights we'll be getting in with the Taliban's airforce. JaneyVee Mar 2013 #4
Well, Newest Reality Mar 2013 #6
A dim, but plausible, view of reality. Scuba Mar 2013 #7
War is peace Thav Mar 2013 #13
It can easily be argued go west young man Mar 2013 #24
Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner. Scuba Mar 2013 #25
Thread win libodem Mar 2013 #38
All of the concentrated wealth? MyshkinCommaPrince Mar 2013 #31
"The Pentagon needs to budget..." Earth_First Mar 2013 #2
What about the Pentagon-audit that is 20 years in the making now? DetlefK Mar 2013 #3
have to read this later--no caffeine yet. 13 billion a year for the next 25 years--just for ONE niyad Mar 2013 #5
One of their toys Mnpaul Mar 2013 #12
I don't normally defend the Pentagon, but they don't want the second engine. A Simple Game Mar 2013 #15
Yes, that is correct Mnpaul Mar 2013 #16
Plant that makes the engine is in Ohio. Boner is a big supporter. Kennah Mar 2013 #33
Wasteful government spending people!!!! Initech Mar 2013 #8
Thanks Texas! FreeBC Mar 2013 #9
2037 ???? Oh for pete sakes. As a tech, this sounds totally ridiculous. We're making tremendous... BlueJazz Mar 2013 #10
For comparison, the F-14 was in service for 32 years... JHB Mar 2013 #11
Oh..I agree with what you say. My main point (which I should have posted) ..is that it's... BlueJazz Mar 2013 #17
The jet might not be obsolete, but the pilot will be. Paul E Ester Mar 2013 #35
The problem is bec Mar 2013 #14
On another note, John2 Mar 2013 #18
c'mon lets be real here..... BrainDrain Mar 2013 #19
A Lot Of It Is For Show grilled onions Mar 2013 #28
Thank you! Bookmarking. nt City Lights Mar 2013 #20
Here is something I posted a while back timdog44 Mar 2013 #21
Yeah, yeah, but F-35s are COOL. Poor people--not so cool. tclambert Mar 2013 #22
MIC=Idiots. go west young man Mar 2013 #23
It seems U.S. fighter pilots have lost that loving feeling for their new F-35 stealth jets. Smilo Mar 2013 #26
Broken? Yes...........Broke? Hell No! Dryvinwhileblind Mar 2013 #27
America is not broke... lib2DaBone Mar 2013 #29
I predict the F-35 will the the most expensive military aircraft.... paleotn Mar 2013 #30
I'll put the B-2 up for the most expensive military aircraft on an acquisition basis unhappycamper Mar 2013 #39
The US is flush with cash. blkmusclmachine Mar 2013 #32
We need the F-35 to fight the aliens Kennah Mar 2013 #34
Yikes. Quantess Mar 2013 #36
Yep...lets cancel the program OnlinePoker Mar 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Next time someone says "A...»Reply #26