Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

CosmicDustBunny

(80 posts)
31. Oh. Well that makes sense. I was wondering about the power drain.
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 01:10 PM
Mar 2013

I remember when the Amiga came out (first true multi-tasking desktop) and the CEO of IBM said there was absolutely no use for multi-tasking on a home computer. I suspect he said that because IBM was so far behind in hardware at the time. Bill Gates dismissed a multi-tasking operating system as "useless". Oh, my, things change. The Amiga had multiple processors on the same bus from the very start. It took a while for other companies to adopt multiple processors and even longer for the CPU manufacturers to embed them in the same chip. Sometimes all you need is a 6502 to do the job at time and other times you need a mainframe.

Your explanation makes a lot of sense. Use the low-drain cores first and pump up to the higher drain cores when necessary. I just haven't kept up on the specific models of chips and their capabilities and speeds. This almost 5-year old laptop has a sticker on it that says "AMD Turion64". I know AMD is a company and I know 64 indicates the bits, but I'll be damned if I know what the significance of the name Turion is.

"Pentium" basically was a cool name for 586. After that, I sort of lost track of what the names meant, if anything. I'm old school. I prefer model numbers the same way I prefer displacement numbers on car engines. I don't care what you call it, what's the damn lineage and current capacity? But hey, that's marketing for you. Give it a cool name and people think "shiney!"



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Apple Announces New Phone [View all] theKed Mar 2013 OP
What did Apple announce? brucefan Mar 2013 #1
The headline is a joke theKed Mar 2013 #2
That they are ready to wave HappyMe Mar 2013 #3
Ooo, my soul sucking, exploitive corporation is better than yours! MadHound Mar 2013 #4
Who Designs These Things RobinA Mar 2013 #5
It's just a background picture RudynJack Mar 2013 #9
Apple's okay, but I prefer Samsung. At least Samsung makes flip phones (the only thing I use). CosmicDustBunny Mar 2013 #6
Love my flip phone. Tikki Mar 2013 #7
Agreed. theKed Mar 2013 #10
The only things I use the screen for are caller ID, checking battery level, and the time. CosmicDustBunny Mar 2013 #12
I prefer analog, too theKed Mar 2013 #13
Chefs? CosmicDustBunny Mar 2013 #15
Yeah theKed Mar 2013 #17
You're a chef? If so, we need to talk privately. I've got a kid looking that direction. CosmicDustBunny Mar 2013 #19
Sure theKed Mar 2013 #23
Apparently I don't have enough posts to start a PM or something. Can you PM me? CosmicDustBunny Mar 2013 #24
Apple iPhones don't even have quad-core phones. Apophis Mar 2013 #8
If they hold true to form theKed Mar 2013 #11
The iPhone 5S just may be a dual-core, 1.9 GHz phone! Apophis Mar 2013 #14
It's cutting edge! theKed Mar 2013 #18
Octo-core? Geeze. My server's only got 6 cores. CosmicDustBunny Mar 2013 #16
Tell me about it. Apophis Mar 2013 #20
Well, then again, the process meter on my server rarely crosses the 25% line and it has 24GB of RAM. CosmicDustBunny Mar 2013 #22
By the clockspeed x number of cores metric, maybe sir pball Mar 2013 #27
Well to be fair, four of them aren't much to look at. sir pball Mar 2013 #25
Any idea what these "small core" versions are based on (with respect to the processor)? CosmicDustBunny Mar 2013 #26
Not quite clear what you mean by "small core".. sir pball Mar 2013 #28
You've got a leg up on me with the geek speak. I mean like my i7 6-core is an... CosmicDustBunny Mar 2013 #29
Hmm...where to begin sir pball Mar 2013 #30
Oh. Well that makes sense. I was wondering about the power drain. CosmicDustBunny Mar 2013 #31
Either headline is wrong or wrong article posted. nt geek tragedy Mar 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Apple Announces New Phone»Reply #31