Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are Mormons Christian? [View all]grantcart
(53,061 posts)156. Just because they don't repeat the Nicene Creed doesn't mean that they don't accept the
the Nicene's Creed Christology and the theology of the Trinity.
Are the Baptists and AnaBaptists saying that the Christ wasn't fully human? Are they saying that he wasn't resurrected.
No.
So even those that accept only scripture and will say no creeds accept the theological conclusions that are embodied in the Nicene Creed.
Here is how one Baptist minister explains the conundrum to his flock
http://www.fbcgh.net/archives/16
Among these watershed events, though, one must mention the development of the Nicene Creedboth its conception at the First Council of Nicea in AD 325 and its subsequent expansion at the First Council of Constantinople in AD 381. The Nicene Creed would come to be the most widely used statement of faith in all the Christian Church throughout time. And its popularity can still be seen today as it is recited or otherwise affirmed in the midst of worship by Roman Catholics, Eastern and Oriental Orthodox, Lutherans, Anglicans, Methodists, Presbyterians, and on and on.
But while the Nicene Creed is embraced by millions of Christians of virtually every denominational tradition, some feel a bit uncomfortable with its wording. Some Christians, particularly of a Baptist or otherwise Evangelical stripe, while wholeheartedly supporting the creeds declaration of the Trinity, flinch at one of the final lines of the text which reads: We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins. To some these words just seem well off. Isnt it our faith that justifies us? Doesnt the heart-felt repentance and commitment we make to the Lord in prayer get the job done? Isnt baptism supposed to be merely an outward expression of an inward and preexistent reality?
Those who feel this way often point to passages in the Bible that support what may be called a direct and immediate view of salvation, that is, a view which implies that justification can be had independent of any outward ritual. As the Apostle Paul declares, with the heart a person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the mouth he confesses, resulting in salvation. (Romans 10:10) And as the Apostle Peter proclaims, we are now living in an age in which, everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved! (Acts 2:21) With these passages in mind Evangelicals generally and Baptists specifically sometimes just cant bring themselves to embrace the creedafter all, the Bible is the prime authority in our lives and creeds (whether they be ancient or modern) are merely human documents liable to error.
But this kind of unease is simply unnecessary. While the Bible does indeed affirm that salvation comes through faith and repentance, it also affirms that baptism is the normal and God-ordained arena in which these sentiments find their appropriate expression. In the book of Acts whenever a man comes to faith in the Lord he is baptized immediately. One might say that his conversion and his baptism are thus so closely linked that they form a single, indistinguishable event. Therefore, while faith and repentance can be expressed simply through prayer, in the New Testament at least, they are always expressed through baptism as an acted prayer.
So whether or not the recite the Nicene Creed or not they accept the Holy Trilogy and so on.
Mormons do not.
Jesus was independent of God.
God was a man who became sanctified and got his own world to play with. And so on.
To sum up;
For about four hundred years followers of Christ devolved into various schools of thought. Eventually the understanding of the Christ and the Resurrection came to be understood by two different schools, the traditional and the Gnostics. The Church came together and codified these into the Nicene Creed. Follow the Creed and the basic ideas of the Creed then you are a Christian, if you don't then you may be a follower of Jesus but you are not what the rest of the Church calls 'Christian'.
I try to follow the teachings of the Rabbi Jesus who some think was the Christ. I cannot ascribe to the Nicene Creed. So even though I was made a ruling elder of the Presbyterian Church on my 18th birthday and the youngest elder in the history of the Church I do not consider myself a 'Christian'.
This is really basic Christianity 101.
If you accept the Holy Triology, the Virgin Birth (even as a theological analogy and not an actual event) and the Resurrection then you are following the basic tenets of the Nicene Creed whether or not your group acknowledges it or not. Doing so puts you in the Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Protestant, Baptist, Anabaptist, Reformed, Restoration, Anglican, Oriental Orthodox, Assyrian.
Some people might not follow that and call themselves 'Christians'.
Marshall Applewhite believed that he was a descendent of Jesus and took his little sect off our earth to the Comet Hale-Bopp. Marshall thought that he was a Christian because he read the Book of Revelation. He was not.
Individuals may call themselves 'Christian' but if it is to have any meaning there must be boundaries or will include Saint Paul and Marshall Applewhite as the same thing. That definition occurred in 325 AD and whether or not they recite the creed from that council people who follow that understanding all share in that tradition.
Joseph Smith did not follow that. He used the teachings of Jesus to write his own Bible and start his own tradition. Brigham Young followed him. When Young was worried about the flagging faith of the Mormons after they settled around Utah he had a young protege Jedidiah Morgan Grant go around the state and preach fire and damnation. JMG was a big success and when he came back Young made him the first Mayor of Salt Lake City. He picked up some virus (maybe pnumonia) and died within a year. Young raised his son Heber J Grant. Heber J Grant became the second longest serving President of the Mormon Church. When the stock market crashed and the entire church and all of its holdings were about to be foreclosed on HJG started enforcing the 'no polygamy' rule in fact. He went to NYC renegotiated the mortgages held by the Church and saved the Mormon Church.
One hundred thirty years later I told Rick Romney (Mitt Romney's first cousin) in the third grade that I was the direct descendent of JMG and HJG but that after getting a little education every single living member of our family had left the Mormon Church (not true because Senator Bennett is a distant cousin) and he cried.
I googled Rick Romney the other day.
He went into investments and worked for Spieker Properties Inc.
His main project was working on the Bay Meadows Development which included the Bay Meadows Racetrack. Making money from the track that Seabiscuit used to run at. I am sure he tithed his 10% and got and even though the Church is 100% against all forms of gambling I am sure he got some kind of exemption. You can do that when you start your own religion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
281 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This belongs in the religous forum. No Jesus wasn't a Christian, he was the son of God. So what
lonestarnot
Jan 2012
#12
To each his own and I say that one day your knees will bow, like it or not. So you have fun now.
lonestarnot
Jan 2012
#22
I love how Christians resort to threats of eternal damnation when their beliefs are challenged.
white_wolf
Jan 2012
#26
Did I say eternal damnation? No I did not. Now when you get back to politics and save the
lonestarnot
Jan 2012
#33
I'm stealing your last quote if you don't mind, as a sig line. Brilliant. nt
riderinthestorm
Jan 2012
#68
Threats of eternal damnation are the most effective tool organized religion has
undeterred
Jan 2012
#37
Oh God, you too? I went to a fundie Christian school in the 70's and saw these types for what
Ecumenist
Jan 2012
#57
The other poster is referencing a specific Scripture, in Romans 14. The full passage
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2012
#133
I suppose it's all perception. I honestly don't think it was meant as a declaration
Ecumenist
Feb 2012
#216
Anyone that tells me "Someday your knees will bow" has a very specific idea in mind.
A HERETIC I AM
Feb 2012
#219
Wow. You wasted a bunch of effort there. Did you have fun? Your opinion of my God is not valuable
lonestarnot
Jan 2012
#66
If your god actually existed, I'd tell him to fuck himself for demanding people "bow down".
Zhade
Feb 2012
#120
I don't reject mythology because of others' interpretations, but because of the lack of evidence.
Zhade
Feb 2012
#170
"Biblical Scholars" all think "he" existed- big surprise, there. Most objective non-Bible historians
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2012
#128
I think you misunderstood. Actually, for all I know there may be Biblical Scholars who dispute the
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2012
#233
I learned long ago - like back in 2003 - that discretion was the better part of valor.
A HERETIC I AM
Jan 2012
#52
he could have been real. doesn't mean he's a diety. at any rate, he was the first documented hippie
dionysus
Jan 2012
#63
I'm more on your side than not, but the reason the gospels were written decades after Jesus lived
deutsey
Jan 2012
#105
You say that with confidence, as if you had hard evidence to back that up.
cleanhippie
Feb 2012
#196
One can decisively reject any notion of Jesus' divinity, but the historical
coalition_unwilling
Feb 2012
#270
That makes as much sense as saying that everyone who claims to be a Democrat, IS a Democrat
SaintPete
Jan 2012
#84
Ah, then you'd need to demonstrate that self indentified Christians follow the teachings
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2012
#135
Just because they don't repeat the Nicene Creed doesn't mean that they don't accept the
grantcart
Feb 2012
#156
They do. Their interpertation of him is different than other sects, of course.
white_wolf
Jan 2012
#13
Lol. You might have had a point, IF I had actually made the argument you say I made
SaintPete
Feb 2012
#255
They talk out of both sides. They follow that Joseph Smith dude, book of mormon and they
lonestarnot
Jan 2012
#14
The full name of the church is "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints".
Nye Bevan
Jan 2012
#15
FYI, Andrew Sullivan posted three blogs with differing opinions on this last October. Links:
highplainsdem
Jan 2012
#21
The fundamentalists I know do not consider either Catholics or Mormons to be Christian...
undeterred
Jan 2012
#23
Thank you, Nye Bevan. I always get upset when people say things like "I was Catholic,
Ecumenist
Jan 2012
#48
I'll never understand how the original form of Christianity became regarded as false
white_wolf
Jan 2012
#61
You're absolutely right. My husband is Catholic, well he's Catholic AND Lutheran...long story
Ecumenist
Jan 2012
#65
Some would say the 'original form' is found in the Acts of the Apostles long prior to
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2012
#139
There's Fundamentalist Catholics that don't believe that non Catholics are Christian
Nikia
Jan 2012
#106
One billion Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant Christians all agree that 'Christian' is defined
grantcart
Feb 2012
#125
Except for those who do not. Quakers, Jehovah's Witnesses, Unitarians, the Church of
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2012
#140
Digit, this Christian loves you just the way you are.. I'm not God and cannot judge you
Ecumenist
Jan 2012
#62
Most accept that Creed, others do not and some reject all Creeds as idols of a sort.
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2012
#142
Look the issue is about the definition of God. Jesus plays a minor role in Mormonism just like Islam
jwirr
Jan 2012
#83
That is what I said it is the definition. I did not say the Mormons defined Jesus as a prophet I
jwirr
Jan 2012
#88
You just said that "Jesus plays a minor role in Mormonism just like Islam".
PassingFair
Jan 2012
#94
Not sure what you are talking about but they have every right to say that since their religion does
jwirr
Feb 2012
#253
Maybe a few are. Of the roughly one billion humans who claim to be Christians, about 2 hundred
Skwid
Jan 2012
#92
Mormons do not fit the orthodox definition of Christianity and cannot be considered 'Christians', so
grantcart
Jan 2012
#96
Those intolerant Church Fathers don't own Christianity any more than Roman Catholics do
Nikia
Jan 2012
#104
You are incorrect that the Nicene Creed is the accepted Standard. Many Protestant
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2012
#146
I've known alot of Mormons, always thought they were Christians. Never asked and don't give a shit.
limpyhobbler
Jan 2012
#101
I agree. I dated a Mormon in college. Learned a lot. Jesus plays almost no role in Mormonism.
Critters2
Feb 2012
#110
To the best of my ability and from reading the Bible, Mormons are Christians
akbacchus_BC
Feb 2012
#118
No, because they believe in a non-canonical 'revealed' Prophet and non-canonical texts
JCMach1
Feb 2012
#131
In practice probably a lot more Christian then the people that say they aren't.
Ganja Ninja
Feb 2012
#134
The "original" covenant was with Adam. Mormons believe the covenant made by Jesus
Romulox
Feb 2012
#164
They are self-proclaimed Christians and view Jesus as the primary figure, HOWEVER,...
HopeHoops
Feb 2012
#145
Not in the traditional sense, since they'd have to accept concepts like the Trinity.
closeupready
Feb 2012
#163
I'm not Mormon, but I do live in Utah. Mormons do consider themselves to be Christians. n/t
helderheid
Feb 2012
#182
Did you ever go though the Book of Morman? Pretty wierd stuff in there. Thats what they believe,
demosincebirth
Feb 2012
#194
They define themselves as much. The entirety of the rest of the discussion is about Scotsmen. (nt)
Posteritatis
Feb 2012
#279