Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is coming directly from the holding doors open discussion? Right? Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #1
No, from the benevolent sexism discussion. redqueen Mar 2013 #2
Sorry. I saw a lot of "benevolent sexism" mentioned in the "door opening" threads. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #6
So if it's throwing feces, you're all in.. but if it's something serious redqueen Mar 2013 #9
So feisty! Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #12
Why would anyone alert on your post? redqueen Mar 2013 #15
You seem so outraged by all this! Squinch Mar 2013 #135
Different definitions of seriousness apply I think... Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #32
"a subconscious urge to subjugate women" does not qualify as serious?? pleae tell me you forgot niyad Mar 2013 #153
i love it when you talk dirty datasuspect Mar 2013 #125
You know, there's a difference between fighting for a cause, and fighting just because. n/t Ian David Mar 2013 #156
no, you saw a lot of "door opening" remarks in the benevolent sexism threads, but, hey, niyad Mar 2013 #10
meh. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #14
You asked redqueen no questions based in reality. NCTraveler Mar 2013 #18
still smarting, are you? Whisp Mar 2013 #19
as are mine, so thanks. niyad Mar 2013 #20
yes. because you men created a manufactured argument to become the victims, being picked on by seabeyond Mar 2013 #28
It's not just the door treestar Mar 2013 #147
This is why I like to stand with my hands on my hips in front of glass doors at the mall.... Ian David Mar 2013 #157
Kick it up a notch. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #158
And then are you supposed to look confused, like you can't understand why the door won't open? n/t Ian David Mar 2013 #177
You've done this before! Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #178
How do you..... NCTraveler Mar 2013 #3
Ok. Noted. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #8
believe me, it is for some posters. niyad Mar 2013 #13
go easy on the straw, man fishwax Mar 2013 #4
You shouldn't open doors. NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #47
Novel idea. I'll give it some thought. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #150
... babylonsister Mar 2013 #152
k and r and thank you for shedding light on a very serious issue. niyad Mar 2013 #5
It has to be intentional. redqueen Mar 2013 #11
Wow, another thread on this? Apophis Mar 2013 #7
nobody is forcing you to read threads you find redundant, or useless, or uninteresting. niyad Mar 2013 #17
A least it's all of those things you listed. That makes is interesting. Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #164
You can never have enough threads on the same subject submitted by the same person. Never. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #26
ah, cause 10 Ops about doors. but, wtf, right? nt seabeyond Mar 2013 #39
Even when the subject is doors? NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #62
Maybe it's a door fetish thing. Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #165
why, isnt it a bummer us women having to continually address these stupid lies the men are putting seabeyond Mar 2013 #30
Um kick any 100 of the other treads on this topic. Apophis Mar 2013 #40
There is only one other OP about this topic. All the rest are about opening doors... Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #42
Exactly. redqueen Mar 2013 #43
"Some," as in you? Apophis Mar 2013 #61
Could you point me to the actual discussion? I am being sincere here... Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #69
Post 31 in this very thread, for example. Apophis Mar 2013 #81
The "drama" is people side-tracking and trivializing the topic of the OP. Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #92
I never claimed the OP was another "stupid door opening thread". Apophis Mar 2013 #95
Okay. So where are the 100 of other OPs on THIS topic that we should Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #98
... Apophis Mar 2013 #99
No. Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #102
This entire thread is theKed Mar 2013 #116
Seriously, Redqueen, this issue started downhill... NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #70
no. it started downhill when a number of men refused to read a definition of benevolent sexism and seabeyond Mar 2013 #72
That never happened. redqueen Mar 2013 #75
Post that same blurb all you like... NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #77
Someone told you what? redqueen Mar 2013 #93
Link NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #96
You misread or mischaracterized his statement. Which is it? redqueen Mar 2013 #97
Actually, you are right about one thing... NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #106
By the same token, if some women don't appreciate having doors held for them simply because Squinch Mar 2013 #137
Nothing about door there treestar Mar 2013 #149
Nope, it started with this.. Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #82
Please re-read from post to which you replied. NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #89
bumper crop of straw this year MattBaggins Mar 2013 #74
It's the flavor of the day. NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #55
yes, a gang of men presenting misogyny is a walk in the park. women know this well. nt seabeyond Mar 2013 #66
Wow...I don't even know what to make of that one. NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #73
when men purposely tell lies repeatedly saying feminists are outraged and picking on them, making seabeyond Mar 2013 #76
Okie dokie, then. NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #85
It is continually and on many threads treestar Mar 2013 #146
I'll put it on the list quinnox Mar 2013 #16
You care that little about the ideas which fuel rape culture. redqueen Mar 2013 #21
Holding doors open for women = Steubenville rapes Major Nikon Mar 2013 #22
You are obviously intentionally twisting words in order to dismiss feminist issues. nt redqueen Mar 2013 #23
Maybe not. Maybe he just saw the same bullshit I saw and is calling it. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #27
See post 25. It's telling that you're all in to mock and trivialize, redqueen Mar 2013 #29
Naturally you would never twist anyone's words around Major Nikon Mar 2013 #38
exactly, lol quinnox Mar 2013 #83
again. manufacturing a lie to dismiss real issues. ya, i get it. you think it is funny and would seabeyond Mar 2013 #33
The irony is getting pretty thick here Major Nikon Mar 2013 #34
That one rejects "no means no" so not a person with credibility on the geek tragedy Mar 2013 #118
It's a slippery Niceguy1 Mar 2013 #160
oh boy quinnox Mar 2013 #24
People who score high in benevolent sexism place less blame on rapists redqueen Mar 2013 #25
Why should that surprise anyone? Major Nikon Mar 2013 #36
Who's surprised? Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #44
Good question Major Nikon Mar 2013 #52
"barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen" are not examples of benevolent sexism. Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #54
That's exactly what benevolent sexism is Major Nikon Mar 2013 #114
Benevolent sexism allows for women in the workplace. Hostile sexism, such as Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #115
Both happen inside and outside the workplace Major Nikon Mar 2013 #117
Since people are mocking the idea of benevolent sexism, by throwing feces in threads about doors, redqueen Mar 2013 #49
"ties into" can be a very misleading statement Major Nikon Mar 2013 #80
Did you read any of the studies which indicate that that is exactly the case? redqueen Mar 2013 #84
No, and I suspect none such studies exist Major Nikon Mar 2013 #104
yes, being uninformed and uneducated, refusing facts is so.... oh what, fox like? and being proud seabeyond Mar 2013 #35
Seems to be plenty of educators around here to set us all straight Major Nikon Mar 2013 #41
no. all you men are doing is contaminating the subject enough to make it about doors. OP after OP seabeyond Mar 2013 #57
Well it's certainly true that anyone who disagrees with a self-described feminist is a misogynist Major Nikon Mar 2013 #86
"All you men are doing..." NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #121
please then, continue with the "edumacation" quinnox Mar 2013 #88
Question to you, are you offended when a man holds a door open for you? yes/no? Logical Mar 2013 #79
Really? Doors? Still? nt redqueen Mar 2013 #87
Yes, simple question. Even for you. Does it offend you? n-t Logical Mar 2013 #90
It's not about fucking doors. The people here who are trying to discuss benevolent sexism Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #94
You keep posting that same piece... NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #123
That it. I refuse to hold doors open for women anymore. Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #167
some interesting stuff at those links, redqueen. Thanks Whisp Mar 2013 #31
Thanks... redqueen Mar 2013 #65
I don't think that a lot of people get that this isn't about opening doors cali Mar 2013 #37
that's why they refuse to go further into the debate with any seriousness. Whisp Mar 2013 #45
people are being assholes, it has reached the level i thought was only possible with wingnuts JI7 Mar 2013 #162
Down with Chivalry!! Who would have survived the Titanic in such an age? MjolnirTime Mar 2013 #46
Probably the people who jumped in lifeboats and rowed like hell. NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #50
another post of dishonesty to contaminate a subject and make men victims. nt seabeyond Mar 2013 #60
Do we really theKed Mar 2013 #48
There are only TWO threads about benevolent sexism. The rest are about opening doors. Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #56
Like I said... theKed Mar 2013 #58
since men are once again contaminating the subject with doors to shut women up and become victims... seabeyond Mar 2013 #63
Those darn men! theKed Mar 2013 #103
If two threads about a topic is burdensome for you, there is a little x next to the title. Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #67
There are (last time I looked anyways) theKed Mar 2013 #101
There are two original posts about benevolent sexism. ALL the rest are about straw... Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #105
None of what I said was false theKed Mar 2013 #108
Clicked on your links, still don't think it's a big deal LittleBlue Mar 2013 #51
Kind of what I thought. NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #59
and still not the issue. but then, consistently you do not have an issue with any sexism, so seabeyond Mar 2013 #68
I don't have an issue with the outrage du jour. LittleBlue Mar 2013 #91
I think it's entirely plausible to believe DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2013 #53
Thumbs up. NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #64
and what about the upward 10 Ops making this about a damn door when we have repeatedly said it is seabeyond Mar 2013 #71
I'm not going to swim in all this, no DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2013 #78
Do you realize that you're the one who keeps bringing up the door in this thread? NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #122
these kinds of posts are an affront to true feminism. datasuspect Mar 2013 #127
and what, exactly, is "true feminism"? niyad Mar 2013 #143
the opposite of carciature feminism datasuspect Mar 2013 #148
having never heard of either "cartoon feminism" or "troll feminism", do, please, elucidate. niyad Mar 2013 #151
lol Sheldon Cooper Mar 2013 #107
Neither you nor the other poster DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2013 #109
Oh, I caught that alright. Sheldon Cooper Mar 2013 #111
+ a million Apophis Mar 2013 #113
You're bucking a coalition here RQ lumberjack_jeff Mar 2013 #100
I for one have taken sharp_stick Mar 2013 #110
Good for you! NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #120
"Benevolent sexism ..." chervilant Mar 2013 #112
Hatred of men is misandry - eom dreamnightwind Mar 2013 #128
I never knew. chervilant Mar 2013 #139
Yawn RetroLounge Mar 2013 #119
Ambivalent Sexism survey klook Mar 2013 #124
Thanks for the links! Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #129
Interesting Orrex Mar 2013 #140
do you hear that? datasuspect Mar 2013 #126
you keep telling yourself that, sweetie. most of us know that simply is not the case. niyad Mar 2013 #130
Would you be offended if someone called you "sweetie"? NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #131
depends on who, and why. but seriously, that is the best you can come up with? niyad Mar 2013 #132
No, it just sort of jumped out at me. NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #133
right-o jiggles, datasuspect Mar 2013 #134
oh my, such a little word to cause such reactions. . apparently a case of "you can dish it out. . niyad Mar 2013 #141
cool post bro datasuspect Mar 2013 #142
remdi95 niyad Mar 2013 #145
ooooh, what's that? A little google nugget, perhaps? Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #166
Would you consider "men will kill each other and everyone" to be a bigoted statement? Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #136
"The beatings will continue until morale improves" ProudToBeBlueInRhody Mar 2013 #138
It is certainly worth discussing... dogknob Mar 2013 #144
What the fuck ismnotwasm Mar 2013 #154
Rawr! dogknob Mar 2013 #159
Well, if it's in a book... NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #179
This is why I ALWAYS leave the toilet seat up. So I'm not benevolently sexist. Ian David Mar 2013 #155
Ew, dude ismnotwasm Mar 2013 #163
I go a step further and leave the seat down and just piss on it. Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #170
you too, eh? d_b Mar 2013 #180
Exactly! Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #181
It's obvious who doesn't care. JTFrog Mar 2013 #161
Yeah, you'd think someone on DU was linking to a blogger who advocates gender-based baby starving. Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #168
Oh, look, here comes one now. n/t JTFrog Mar 2013 #169
here comes one what? A blogger who advocates starving babies on the basis of gender? Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #171
GFY. JTFrog Mar 2013 #172
Grand Forks Yountville? Grievously Ferocious Yodeling? Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #173
Good For You. JTFrog Mar 2013 #174
Okay, Okay. "My Hovercraft Is Full Of Eels" Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #175
GFY? Official music video Kenelis 'GFY' (Radio Edit) Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #176
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you're unsure why bene...»Reply #20