Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you're unsure why benevolent sexism is worth discussing,Google 'benevolent sexism victim blaming' [View all]niyad
(132,464 posts)20. as are mine, so thanks.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
181 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you're unsure why benevolent sexism is worth discussing,Google 'benevolent sexism victim blaming' [View all]
redqueen
Mar 2013
OP
Sorry. I saw a lot of "benevolent sexism" mentioned in the "door opening" threads.
Buzz Clik
Mar 2013
#6
"a subconscious urge to subjugate women" does not qualify as serious?? pleae tell me you forgot
niyad
Mar 2013
#153
You know, there's a difference between fighting for a cause, and fighting just because. n/t
Ian David
Mar 2013
#156
no, you saw a lot of "door opening" remarks in the benevolent sexism threads, but, hey,
niyad
Mar 2013
#10
yes. because you men created a manufactured argument to become the victims, being picked on by
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#28
This is why I like to stand with my hands on my hips in front of glass doors at the mall....
Ian David
Mar 2013
#157
And then are you supposed to look confused, like you can't understand why the door won't open? n/t
Ian David
Mar 2013
#177
nobody is forcing you to read threads you find redundant, or useless, or uninteresting.
niyad
Mar 2013
#17
You can never have enough threads on the same subject submitted by the same person. Never.
Buzz Clik
Mar 2013
#26
why, isnt it a bummer us women having to continually address these stupid lies the men are putting
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#30
There is only one other OP about this topic. All the rest are about opening doors...
Luminous Animal
Mar 2013
#42
Could you point me to the actual discussion? I am being sincere here...
Luminous Animal
Mar 2013
#69
The "drama" is people side-tracking and trivializing the topic of the OP.
Luminous Animal
Mar 2013
#92
no. it started downhill when a number of men refused to read a definition of benevolent sexism and
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#72
By the same token, if some women don't appreciate having doors held for them simply because
Squinch
Mar 2013
#137
yes, a gang of men presenting misogyny is a walk in the park. women know this well. nt
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#66
when men purposely tell lies repeatedly saying feminists are outraged and picking on them, making
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#76
You are obviously intentionally twisting words in order to dismiss feminist issues. nt
redqueen
Mar 2013
#23
again. manufacturing a lie to dismiss real issues. ya, i get it. you think it is funny and would
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#33
"barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen" are not examples of benevolent sexism.
Luminous Animal
Mar 2013
#54
Benevolent sexism allows for women in the workplace. Hostile sexism, such as
Luminous Animal
Mar 2013
#115
Since people are mocking the idea of benevolent sexism, by throwing feces in threads about doors,
redqueen
Mar 2013
#49
yes, being uninformed and uneducated, refusing facts is so.... oh what, fox like? and being proud
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#35
no. all you men are doing is contaminating the subject enough to make it about doors. OP after OP
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#57
Well it's certainly true that anyone who disagrees with a self-described feminist is a misogynist
Major Nikon
Mar 2013
#86
Question to you, are you offended when a man holds a door open for you? yes/no?
Logical
Mar 2013
#79
It's not about fucking doors. The people here who are trying to discuss benevolent sexism
Luminous Animal
Mar 2013
#94
people are being assholes, it has reached the level i thought was only possible with wingnuts
JI7
Mar 2013
#162
There are only TWO threads about benevolent sexism. The rest are about opening doors.
Luminous Animal
Mar 2013
#56
since men are once again contaminating the subject with doors to shut women up and become victims...
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#63
If two threads about a topic is burdensome for you, there is a little x next to the title.
Luminous Animal
Mar 2013
#67
There are two original posts about benevolent sexism. ALL the rest are about straw...
Luminous Animal
Mar 2013
#105
and still not the issue. but then, consistently you do not have an issue with any sexism, so
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#68
and what about the upward 10 Ops making this about a damn door when we have repeatedly said it is
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#71
Do you realize that you're the one who keeps bringing up the door in this thread?
NaturalHigh
Mar 2013
#122
having never heard of either "cartoon feminism" or "troll feminism", do, please, elucidate.
niyad
Mar 2013
#151
you keep telling yourself that, sweetie. most of us know that simply is not the case.
niyad
Mar 2013
#130
oh my, such a little word to cause such reactions. . apparently a case of "you can dish it out. .
niyad
Mar 2013
#141
Would you consider "men will kill each other and everyone" to be a bigoted statement?
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#136
This is why I ALWAYS leave the toilet seat up. So I'm not benevolently sexist.
Ian David
Mar 2013
#155
Yeah, you'd think someone on DU was linking to a blogger who advocates gender-based baby starving.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#168
here comes one what? A blogger who advocates starving babies on the basis of gender?
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#171