General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]kdmorris
(5,649 posts)I think it started here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022512182 and continued here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022517432
The definitions included carrying heavy boxes for women, opening doors just for women and other forms of benevolent sexism that "many women appreciate".
That being said - this has turned GD into meta and made DU suck. It would have been better for her to leave benevolent sexism as just what you did - a definition of what it was. Two more threads were not needed to discuss it, right?
And I stand by what I said on the other two threads - I do not give a rat's ass about benevolent sexism right now when there is so much malevolent sexism out there. When we get to the point as a society that all we have left to worry about in gender equality is benevolent sexism, then we've truly made great strides... to me, it comes after sexual abuse and reproductive rights and equal pay for equal jobs.
This whole discussion about benevolent sexism and opening doors is a derailed train wreck and takes away from discussing serious issues (did you know that the judge is handing down his verdict in the Stuebenville case today? That thread sank like a ROCK while everyone was discussing holding doors and how men are hostile to women on DU). It's just another Meta subject now...