This message was self-deleted by its author

[Ruby the Liberal]

57. Jury is back

You had to know that was coming.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Feb 1, 2012, 12:23 PM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I'm not sure that the plural is "uteruses" instead of "uteri", but I see no reason to hide the post on something as trivial as a possible spelling error. Everything else seems fine.

Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: Just because someone doesn't have a uterus doesn't mean they can't have an opinion.

Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: A little harsh, but does promote discussion. Not all discussions are positive. That would make for an echo chamber.

Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Although I thought the poster was a little over the top, I will vote to leave it alone only because it seems like a round and round circle of agreeing to disagree.

Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: The comment is harsh, but on topic. The foundation of this comment is who gets to decide about abortions, not about the number of abortions or what might be considered abortive (like birth control). The question isn't about how to calculate birth control numbers or numbers of abortions performed, but who gets to decide. Clearly the poster believes that these decisions are up to those directly involved in either aborting, or controlling reproduction.

Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given