Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
8. It's rare for such cases to go to trial because (1) the judges don't want such cases to go to trial,
Tue Mar 19, 2013, 12:55 AM
Mar 2013

and (2) finding an attorney who will overcome all obstacles and take a case to trial is rare and difficult.

Trials take up court resources. Judges are marked by their peers according to how many cases they can process in comparison to the other judges. They want the cases to move along. They have a lot of discretion as to how they handle their courtrooms. Attorneys who want to come back in their courtrooms again in the future know this. When a judge starts putting pressure on the attorneys in a particular case to settle, there are a lot of things that a judge can do.

Even experienced trial attorneys prefer to settle. Some may remember Melvin Belli, a top-notch trial attorney. Even he had a reputation for taking cases to verdicts only about twice a year.

When victims find attorneys and start the litigation process, they've already shown their courage. They don't have exclusive control over whether a case will go to a jury. Even if they manage to find an attorney who will sue the police, there are lots of tricks that attorneys use to ensure that they will be the ones controlling whether a proposed offer will be agreed to by a client.

Whether any victims are placed in situations where they may be able to get some justice through settlements, their acts of settling their cases should not be viewed as a mere lack of courage on their part.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

read on... DollarBillHines Mar 2013 #1
I know it's hard for victims to go through a trial, but I hope someone has the courage liberal_at_heart Mar 2013 #5
It's rare for such cases to go to trial because (1) the judges don't want such cases to go to trial, AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #8
I don't see how he's faced any official consequences so far. I think King is onto something. n/t hughee99 Mar 2013 #6
Anyone care to explain the "Few bad apples." theory again? A fucking COMMANDER? TheMadMonk Mar 2013 #2
+1 RedCappedBandit Mar 2013 #7
Oh Goody... He's Part Of The "Community" Policing Effort... WillyT Mar 2013 #3
Police are cowardly bullies! And their unions make it worse! n-t Logical Mar 2013 #4
Don't blame unions for their c student idiocy. lonestarnot Mar 2013 #11
The police unions protect crooked cops! Disagree? N-t? Logical Mar 2013 #12
That is the conservative argument against ALL Unions. bvar22 Mar 2013 #14
LOL, Bullshit, I am not talking about a disagreement over overtime pay or wages.... Logical Mar 2013 #16
I would like to disagree, but I'm sure that it happens. lonestarnot Mar 2013 #17
What do you expect when the Fed Gov sends the message that a little torture is okay? nt Bonobo Mar 2013 #9
Tell me again why in the fuck is a fucker like that on our payroll? lonestarnot Mar 2013 #10
Morning Kick !!! WillyT Mar 2013 #13
Just a "bad apple" I'm sure! Bake Mar 2013 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cop Fractures Woman’s Fac...»Reply #8