Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

REP

(21,691 posts)
96. Actually, abortion does not have negative emotional sequelae
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 08:35 PM
Feb 2012

Here are some peer-reviewed studies:


Long answer:

Abortion doesn't affect well-being, study says

New York Times (as printed in the San Jose Mercury 2/12/97)

Abortion does not trigger lasting emotional trauma in young women who
are psychologically healthy before they become pregnant, an eight-year
study of nearly 5,300 women has shown. Women who are in poor shape
emotionally after an abortion are likely to have been feeling bad about
their lives before terminating their pregnancies, the researchers said.

The findings, the researchers say, challenge the validity of laws
that have been proposed in many states, and passed in several, mandating
that women seeking abortions be informed of mental health risks.

The researchers, Dr. Nancy Felipe Russo, a psychologist at Arizona
State University in Tempe, and Dr. Amy Dabul Marin, a psychologist at
Phoenix College, examined the effects of race and religion on the
well-being of 773 women who reported on sealed questionnaires that
they had undergone abortions, and they compared the results with the
emotional status of women who did not report abortions.

The women, initially 14 to 24 years old, completed questionnaires and
were interviewed each year for eight years, starting in 1979. In 1980
and in 1987, the interview also included a standardized test that
measures overall well-being, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.

"Given the persistent assertion that abortion is associated with
negative outcomes, the lack of any results in the context of such a
large sample is noteworthy," the researchers wrote. The study took
into account many factors that can influence a woman's emotional
well-being, including education, employment, income, the presence of
a spouse and the number of children.

Higher self-esteem was associated with being employed, having a
higher income, having more years of education and bearing fewer children,
but having had an abortion "did not make a difference," the researchers
reported. And the women's religious affiliations and degree of involvement
with religion did not have an independent effect on their long-term
reaction to abortion. Rather, the women's psychological well-being before
having abortions accounted for their mental state in the years after the
abortion, the researchers said..

In considering the influence of race, the researchers again found
that the women's level of self-esteem before having abortions was the
strongest predictor of their well-being after an abortion.

"Although highly religious Catholic women were slightly more likely
to exhibit post-abortion psychological distress than other women, this
fact is explained by lower pre-existing self-esteem," the researchers
wrote in the current issue of Professional Psychology: Research and
Practice, a journal of the American Psychological Association.

Overall, Catholic women who attended church one or more times a week,
even those who had not had abortions, had generally lower self-esteem
than other women, although within the normal range, so it was hardly
surprising that they also had lower self-esteem after abortions, the
researchers said in interviews.

Gail Quinn, executive director of anti-abortion activities for the
United States Catholic Conference, said the findings belied the
experience of post-abortion counselors. She said, "While many women
express `relief' following an abortion, the relief is transitory."
In the long term, the experience prompts "hurting people to seek the
help of post-abortion healing services," she said.

The president of the National Right to Life Committee, Dr. Wanda
Franz, who earned her doctorate in developmental psychology, challenged
the researchers' conclusions. She said their assessment of self-esteem
"does not measure if a woman is mentally healthy," adding, "This requires
a specialist who performs certain tests, not a self-assessment of how
the woman feels about herself."

The Relationship of Abortion to Well-being: Do Race and Religion Make a Difference?
Nancy Felipe Russo and Amy J. Dabul
Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 1997, Vol. 28, No , 23-31

Relationships of abortion and childbearing to well-being were examined for 1,189 Black and 3,147 White women. Education, income, and having a work role were positively and independently related to well-being for all women. Abortion did not have an independent relationship to well-being, regardless of race or religion, when well-being before becoming pregnant was controlled. These findings suggest professional psychologists should explore the origins of women's mental health problems in experiences predating their experience of abortion, and they can assist psychologists in working to ensure that mandated scripts from 'informed consent' legislation do not misrepresent scientific findings.


RUSSO, NANCY FELIPE
ZIERK, K.
Abortion, Childbearing, and Women's Well-Being
Professional Psychology, Research and Practice 23 (1992): 269-280. Also, http://www.prochoiceforum.org.uk/psy_resea...
Cohort(s): NLSY79
ID Number: 4029
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)

This study is based on a secondary analysis of NLSY interview data from 5,295 women who were interviewed annually from 1979 to 1987. Among this group 773 women were identified in 1987 as having at least one abortion, with 233 of them reporting repeat abortions. Well-being was assessed in 1980 and 1987 by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. The researchers used analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple regression to examine the combined and separate contributions of preabortion self-esteem, contextual variables (education, employment, income, and marital status), childbearing (being a parent, numbers of wanted and unwanted children) and abortion (having one abortion, having repeat abortions, number of abortions, time since last abortion) to women's post abortion self-esteem.




Most Women Do Not Feel Distress, Regret After Undergoing Abortion, Study Says



   The majority of women who choose to have legal abortions do not experience regret or long-term negative emotional effects from their decision to undergo the procedure, according to a study published in the June issue of the journal Social Science & Medicine, NewsRx.com/Mental Health Weekly Digest reports. Dr. A. Kero and colleagues in the Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology at University Hospital in Umea, Sweden, interviewed 58 women at periods of four months and 12 months after the women's abortions. The women also answered a questionnaire prior to their abortions that asked about their living conditions, decision-making processes and general attitudes toward the pregnancy and the abortion. According to the study, most women "did not experience any emotional distress post-abortion"; however, 12 of the women said they experienced severe distress immediately after the procedure. Almost all of the women said they felt little distress at the one-year follow-up interview. The women who said they experienced no post-abortion distress had indicated prior to the procedure that they opted not to give birth because they "prioritized work, studies, and/or existing children," according to the study. According to the researchers, "almost all" of the women said the abortion was a "relief or a form of taking responsibility," and more than half of the women said they experienced positive emotional experiences after the abortion such as "mental growth and maturity of the abortion process" (NewsRx.com/Mental Health Weekly Digest, 7/12).

http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports...

The psychological sequelae of therapeutic abortion--denied and completed

PK Dagg
Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ont., Canada.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to review the available literature on the psychological sequelae of therapeutic abortion, addressing both the issue of the effects of the abortion on the woman involved and the effects on the woman and on the child born when abortion is denied. METHOD: Papers reviewed were initially selected by using a Medline search. This procedure resulted in 225 papers being reviewed, which were further selected by limiting the papers to those reporting original research. Finally, studies were assessed as to whether or not they used control groups or objective, validated symptom measures. RESULTS: Adverse sequelae occur in a minority of women, and when such symptoms occur, they usually seem to be the continuation of symptoms that appeared before the abortion and are on the wane immediately after the abortion. Many women denied abortion show ongoing resentment that may last for years, while children born when the abortion is denied have numerous, broadly based difficulties in social, interpersonal, and occupational functions that last at least into early adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: With increasing pressure on access to abortion services in North America, nonpsychiatrist physicians and mental health professionals need to keep in mind the effects of both performing and denying therapeutic abortion. Increased research into these areas, focusing in particular on why some women are adversely affected by the procedure and clarifying the relationship issues involved, continues to be important.
Am J Psychiatry 1991; 148:578-585
http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/conten...


Psychological sequelae of medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation.

Ashok PW, Hamoda H, Flett GM, Kidd A, Fitzmaurice A, Templeton A.

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.

Background. Although not much research comparing the emotional distress following medical and surgical abortion is available, few studies have compared psychological sequelae following both methods of abortion early in the first trimester of pregnancy. The aim of this review was to assess the psychological sequelae and emotional distress following medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation. Methods. Partially randomized patient preference trial in a Scottish Teaching Hospital was conducted. The hospital anxiety and depression scales were used to assess emotional distress. Anxiety levels were also assessed using visual analog scales while semantic differential rating scales were used to measure self-esteem. A total of 368 women were randomized, while 77 entered the preference cohort. Results. There were no significant differences in hospital anxiety and depression scales scores for anxiety or depression between the groups. Visual analog scales showed higher anxiety levels in women randomized to surgery prior to abortion (P < 0.0001), while women randomized to surgical treatment were less anxious after abortion (P < 0.0001). Semantic differential rating scores showed a fall in self-esteem in the randomized medical group compared to those undergoing surgery (P = 0.02). Conclusions. Medical abortion at 10-13 weeks is effective and does not increase psychological morbidity compared to surgical vacuum aspiration and hence should be made available to all women undergoing abortion at these gestations.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Aug;84(8) 61-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...


Post abortion syndrome: myth or reality?

Koop CE.

What are the health effects upon a woman who has had an abortion? In his letter to President Reagan, dated January 9, 1989, Surgeon General C. Everett Koop wrote that in order to find an answer to this question the Public Health Service would need from 10 to 100 million dollars for a comprehensive study.

PIP: At a 1987 briefing for Right to Life leaders, the author--US Surgeon General C Everett Koop--was requested to prepare a comprehensive report on the health effects (mental and physical) of induced abortion. To prepare for this task, the author met with 27 groups with philosophical, social, medical, or other professional interests in the abortion issue; interviewed women who had undergone this procedure; and conducted a review of the more than 250 studies in the literature pertaining to the psychological impact of abortion. Every effort was made to eliminate the bias that surrounds this controversial issue. It was not possible, however, to reach any conclusions about the health effects of abortion. In general, the studies on the psychological sequelae of abortion indicate a low incidence of adverse mental health effects. On the other hand, the evidence tends to consist of case studies and the few nonanecdotal reports that exist contain serious methodological flaws. In terms of the physical effects, abortion has been associated with subsequent infertility, a damaged cervix, miscarriage, premature birth, and low birthweight. Again, there are methodological problems. 1st, these events are difficult to quantify since most abortions are performed in free-standing clinics where longterm outcome is not recorded. 2nd, it is impossible to casually link these adverse outcomes to the abortion per se. Resolution of this question requires a prospective study of a cohort of women of childbearing age in reference to the variable outcomes of mating--failure to conceive, miscarriage, abortion, and delivery. Ideally, such a study would be conducted over a 5-year period and would cost approximately US$100 million
Health Matrix. 1989 Summer;7(2):42-4.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...

Psychological sequelae of induced abortion.

Romans-Clarkson SE.

Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand.

This article reviews the scientific literature on the psychological sequelae of induced abortion. The methodology and results of studies carried out over the last twenty-two years are examined critically. The unanimous consensus is that abortion does not cause deleterious psychological effects. Women most likely to show subsequent problems are those who were pressured into the operation against their own wishes, either by relatives or because their pregnancy had medical or foetal contraindications. Legislation which restricts abortion causes problems for women with unwanted pregnancies and their doctors. It is also unjust, as it adversely most affects lower socio-economic class women.

PIP: A review of empirical studies on the psychological sequelae of induced abortion published since 1965 revealed no evidence of adverse effects. On the other hand, this review identified widespread methodological problems--improper sampling, lack of data on women's previous psychiatric history, a scarcity of prospective study designs, a lack of specified follow-up times or evaluation procedures, and a failure to distinguish between legal, illegal, and spontaneous abortions--that need to be addressed by psychiatric epidemiologists. Despite these methodological weaknesses, all 34 studies found significant improvement rather than deterioration in mental status after induced abortion. There was also a high degree of congruity in terms of predictors of adverse reactions after abortion--ambivalence about the procedure, a history of psychosocial instability, poor or absent family ties, psychiatric illness at the time of the pregnancy termination, and negative attitudes toward abortion in the broader society. As expected, criminal abortion is more likely than legal abortion to be associated with guilt, and women who have been denied therapeutic abortions report significantly greater psychosocial difficulties than those who have been granted abortion on the grounds of their precarious mental health. Overall, the research clearly attests that abortion carried out at a woman's request has no deleterious psychiatric consequences. Problems arise only when the woman undergoes pregnancy termination as a result of pressure from others. Legislation that undermines the ability of the pregnant woman to assess herself the impact of an unwanted pregnancy on her future impedes mental health and should be opposed by the psychiatric profession.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1989 Dec;23(4):555-65
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...

Psychological and social aspects of induced abortion.

Handy JA.

The literature concerning psychosocial aspects of induced abortion is reviewed. Key areas discussed are: the legal context of abortion in Britain, psychological characteristics of abortion-seekers, pre- and post-abortion contraceptive use, pre- and post-abortion counselling, the actual abortion and the effects of termination versus refused abortion. Women seeking termination are found to demonstrate more psychological disturbance than other women, however this is probably temporary and related to the short-term stresses of abortion. Inadequate contraception is frequent prior to abortion but improves afterwards. Few women find the decision to terminate easy and most welcome opportunities for non-judgemental counselling. Although some women experience adverse psychological sequelae after abortion the great majority do not. In contrast, refused abortion often results in psychological distress for the mother and an impoverished environment for the ensuing offspring.
Br J Clin Psychol. 1982 Feb;21 (Pt 1):29-41.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...

As for ending the life of a zygote/embryo/fetus - rest your mind. Over 90% of sexually active women have had an early spontaneous abortion without realizing it - thinking it was a heavy period. It's natures design. (deCherney Obstetrics)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Are_grits_groceries Feb 2012 OP
any money i may have donated to susan g komen barbtries Feb 2012 #1
+1 Scuba Feb 2012 #144
I like Juanita Jean's response hobbit709 Feb 2012 #2
Brilliant JustAnotherGen Feb 2012 #3
Yep! Delphinus Feb 2012 #4
Might this make a good OP? JNelson6563 Feb 2012 #5
She's a Right Winger - anti LGBT as well. ehrnst Feb 2012 #9
K&R-ing this thread so this idea gets seen renate Feb 2012 #10
I just went to the PP website and donated.. ananda Feb 2012 #82
Just sent a donation in her name. Hope she enjoys all the cards! likesmountains 52 Feb 2012 #111
I'll do that ... and send some wire coat-hangers to Komen. TahitiNut Feb 2012 #156
I'm saving my pittance of donatable $$ for the DU heart drive for PP Kali Feb 2012 #165
Karen Handel is an outspoken anti-choicer obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #6
I have to correct the factual inaccuracies in your post Zebedeo Feb 2012 #11
My post was correct, you can use your stats however you wish obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #12
OK. In what other contexts would you consider 332,278 Zebedeo Feb 2012 #19
You're not reading before you post...she said abortions is one of the joeybee12 Feb 2012 #20
No. Zebedeo Feb 2012 #22
And? That's great. lapislzi Feb 2012 #24
Then at least YOU are intellectually honest Zebedeo Feb 2012 #30
Who is saying abortion is a 'wonderful' thing? Access to health care services, including abortion Fuzz Feb 2012 #40
Posters in this thread Zebedeo Feb 2012 #44
Who is being "intellectually dishonest" now? obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #48
Who said that they want the number to increase? And, your quotes from your own post mislead. yardwork Feb 2012 #69
Post #39, for example Zebedeo Feb 2012 #84
Too chicken to address me directly. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #108
"They want the number to increase" trumad Feb 2012 #79
What's that got to do with saying people find abortions are a 'wonderful' thing? Fuzz Feb 2012 #101
It's because we don't care about the number obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #46
I can think of one reason. laundry_queen Feb 2012 #77
I'll take the bullet for you. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #83
Nothing that I have posted in this thread, or any thread on DU Zebedeo Feb 2012 #88
Ain't plausible deniability worderful? 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #95
You really can't stand the reality of that 3% of services obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #102
Or 15% of income, which is still a minor fraction. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #114
What I would celebrate... ananda Feb 2012 #80
In every context obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #26
SMH Mr Dixon Feb 2012 #62
In 2008, there were 1,211,500 abortions performed in all of the US REP Feb 2012 #70
Thank God they didn't have to resort to back alley butchers! annabanana Feb 2012 #119
Thank you, annabanana! Carolina Feb 2012 #158
Okay, so there are roughly 115,000 kids awaiting adoption in foster care right now justiceischeap Feb 2012 #150
From the same Wikipedia article... JHB Feb 2012 #13
Yup, I edited mine to add in the percentages obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #14
Pffft. Facts don't matter when there's an agenda to be pushed REP Feb 2012 #16
I'm not flush, but if it's going to PP? obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #28
They are counting each refill of a birth control prescription as Zebedeo Feb 2012 #21
I'm not defensive at all obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #23
332,000 per year - "that isn't alot of abortions." Zebedeo Feb 2012 #27
I don't consider any number alot obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #29
If you don't consider any number a lot, Zebedeo Feb 2012 #33
What would you consider "a lot", "a lot" being a totally subjective number? uppityperson Feb 2012 #35
332,278 per year n/t Zebedeo Feb 2012 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author Bunny Feb 2012 #37
Well, I guess you should push for more abortions so that they are not so few and far between Zebedeo Feb 2012 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author Bunny Feb 2012 #50
I like your answer. :) Spock_is_Skeptical Feb 2012 #134
Best answer ever Irishonly Feb 2012 #161
I'd think the relevant and honest way of stating it would be LanternWaste Feb 2012 #63
And what number would be acceptable to you? Gold Metal Flake Feb 2012 #38
Too few, actually. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #39
Wow -- that's alot of unborn possible babies obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #43
They must do them all to cover their abortion stats. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #45
I bet each testicle counts as one instance obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #47
How about 1,211,500 - the number of ALL abortions performed in the US in 2008? REP Feb 2012 #72
I think that's tragic Zebedeo Feb 2012 #85
Why? REP Feb 2012 #89
Because abortion Zebedeo Feb 2012 #93
Actually, abortion does not have negative emotional sequelae REP Feb 2012 #96
Thank you for posting all that. uppityperson Feb 2012 #121
I imagine that a back alley abortion causes emotional and physical trauma. In fact, sometimes death. yardwork Feb 2012 #127
You are correct. That is addressed in this study: REP Feb 2012 #138
and the adverse effects would be a lot less if they weren't constantly hounded by it. grantcart Feb 2012 #147
Except peer-reviewed studies show that isn't true obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #106
Where'd you get that information about the experience of the "baby's" mother and father? yardwork Feb 2012 #126
it depends on how you intend to decrease the number of abortions magical thyme Feb 2012 #157
Why is it tragic and heartbreaking? obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #104
Are you going to support all Carolina Feb 2012 #160
Not all abortions involve a live fetus or "healthy birth" - but all abortions involve a live mother. haele Feb 2012 #76
Thoughtful post, but you conflate two different issues Zebedeo Feb 2012 #86
Two tenths of one percent of women got abortions last year a simple pattern Feb 2012 #103
nonsequitur Zebedeo Feb 2012 #109
They don't exist for you people after they're born, do they? a simple pattern Feb 2012 #117
No. You said 332,278 per year was "a lot", not 'not "very few"'. If you are going to claim you said uppityperson Feb 2012 #122
Actually, they aren't different issues. haele Feb 2012 #135
How many uteruses do you have? I'm betting the number is zero, or maybe one. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #53
YOU GO, WARREN!!! obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #54
Thank you. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #56
Jury is back Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #57
hey juror #2: MY opinion is that it's the woman's decision, period. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #60
Also, without getting too much into meta territory, this highlights one of the problems with Juries Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #66
Exactly n/t obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #67
That experience was educational; up to now, I thought you were notified if a post was alerted on. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #78
I did not "advocate an anti-choice agenda." I merely corrected an erroneous claim Zebedeo Feb 2012 #87
Out of 1,211,500 total abortions in the US (2008) - Planned Parenthood doesn't perform even half REP Feb 2012 #91
Well, it's not "very few." That was a whopper of a statement. Zebedeo Feb 2012 #94
Quibble over your notion if a quarter is a very few or not. REP Feb 2012 #97
What do you think of Skinner's initiative here? 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #99
irrelevant Zebedeo Feb 2012 #110
I also just contributed $25 to Planned Parenthood. Because of you and you alone. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #112
No shit. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #118
Yeah! Let's contribute, man! For Zebedeo! Hallelujah! Praise the FSM and Dawkins who is His prophet! 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #120
What do you think of it? Not in relation to this thread. uppityperson Feb 2012 #123
Nope, my claim was true -- 3% keeps staring you in the face obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #107
Right. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #116
In old DU, your post would probably have been deleted. This is a much better outcome. yardwork Feb 2012 #129
BTW, I am not the one Zebedeo Feb 2012 #140
Well, that's rather rude. But I have a thick skin and am willing to forgive and forget. Zebedeo Feb 2012 #90
If someone finds a gun has become dependent upon their body to survive... REP Feb 2012 #92
Rudeness 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #113
I don't care if you think it's "rude". I'm sick as fuck of fucking anti-choicers. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #115
You didn't answer the question about women who have had hysterectomies. Zebedeo Feb 2012 #128
The MAJOR thing you are forgetting is that making abortion illegal will NOT prevent abortions. FarLeftFist Feb 2012 #132
Okay. To start, "Opinion" can mean several different things. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #142
You answered two questions Zebedeo Feb 2012 #143
Here's a question for you.... Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #145
You're not listening to me. But OK; I'll let you define the terms of the debate and ..wait, what? Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #166
Oh my obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #130
...DINGDINGDINGDINGDING!!! We have a winner Spock_is_Skeptical Feb 2012 #137
We have a winner, folks! proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 #100
Oh damn a simple pattern Feb 2012 #105
I gotta agree with you there, Warren. MADem Feb 2012 #146
Way to go! Irishonly Feb 2012 #162
Are you going to lecture us about the "holocaust of the unborn" now, too? PVnRT Feb 2012 #58
IMO Mr Dixon Feb 2012 #64
You are 100% right obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #68
Document or retract. REP Feb 2012 #71
No documentation of this spurious claim. Not surprised at all. REP Feb 2012 #98
Where did you get that information from? Link please. Thank you for showing it's not just made up uppityperson Feb 2012 #124
I Googled and found out where that info came from obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #131
Probably wouldn't. "tragic and heartbreaking" indeed. uppityperson Feb 2012 #133
Each refill of a birth control prescription prevents an unwanted pregnancy. yardwork Feb 2012 #125
Of course I do. Zebedeo Feb 2012 #139
This is 100% not true, and you haven't documented it as asked obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #151
"This is done for PR purposes in order to make the organization less controversial." Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #153
You don't seem to care about preventing pregnancies. Maybe you're against birth control? yardwork Feb 2012 #154
+1000 librechik Feb 2012 #31
That's about 15% of its 2009-2010 budget. Sgent Feb 2012 #15
A very small % of what they do, but shows how important they are to women. MH1 Feb 2012 #17
Of course Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #52
Thank you, Gormy, I was obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #55
Do you think abortion should be legal? 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #81
Three percent (3%) of all Planned Parenthood services are abortions ellie Feb 2012 #136
I have been informed this poster is no longer with us obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #164
It isn't even all about abortion. It's that notion of PLANNED parenthood MH1 Feb 2012 #18
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #7
More information on Karen Handel, Komen's new VP of Public Policy ehrnst Feb 2012 #8
So apparently lesbian women don't get breast cancer KamaAina Feb 2012 #49
And no post menopausal women get breast cancer either sarge43 Feb 2012 #149
This news saddens me Harmony Blue Feb 2012 #25
K & R Scurrilous Feb 2012 #32
Hey Erick Erickson, you are a fucking idiot. NOTE: Erik is the RW quoted in OP, NOT the OP. uppityperson Feb 2012 #34
+1... SidDithers Feb 2012 #42
Since that post was hidden due to reading comprehension issues on the part of the jurors kath Feb 2012 #141
+1 for this and for blogslut's hidden post. Bolo Boffin Feb 2012 #73
Good information! Thank you for letting us know WHERE the pressure came from csziggy Feb 2012 #51
I PLEDGE I will NEVER visit a Susan G. Komen care center or donate to them. librechik Feb 2012 #59
This story is hitting the media and of course the various feminist groups... CBHagman Feb 2012 #61
A facebook friend said PP has had a spike of 26% donations today obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #65
I saw that PP got $400K donated yesterday Bolo Boffin Feb 2012 #74
Wow -- a 250K donantion! obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #75
They started pissing me off when they started suing small charities, to be honest. MADem Feb 2012 #148
I know! obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #152
We need a "Planned Parenthood" walk for charity! ThatsMyBarack Feb 2012 #155
There is also another connection here: James O'keefe Raine1967 Feb 2012 #159
Planned Parenthood should go after the SGK foundation's core business. Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #163
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #96